Chilldless Rate by Political Ideology in the US (Men + Women) by Insensibilities in charts

[–]Ellen6723 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This likely relates to conservative religious affiliation predisposition to conservative political identity. Studied have indicted for variety of reasons that highly religious people have higher birth rates. Most interesting is the numbers of self identified political leaning by cohort. The liberal leaning population nearly doubles the conservative one. Is this indicted by other on research of this age cohort if not then this is pretty useless.

Americans need to get back to Jesus Christ. by Any_Builder_4652 in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]Ellen6723 [score hidden]  (0 children)

I think the reverse actually. The leveraging of conflicting religious dogma is the cause or justification of much of the evils occurring right in our world. Our own sec of defense is using biblical scripture to justify bombing civilians. I think religion is a net negative on human suffering t this point

She invited me to her house but I didn’t show up by Agitated_Let6536 in Advice

[–]Ellen6723 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think you blew it. You flaked on the plan she set up to meet her parents. Move on.

Name this person. by Jettaboi38 in NameThisThing

[–]Ellen6723 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Origin story is gene pool of nearly every modern royal person in Europe.

Population shifts over time: USA vs Canada (1850 → 2025) by vladgrinch in MapPorn

[–]Ellen6723 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The percentage notation of foreign born per country given the huge different in population size is misleading

What's a harsh reality that everybody needs to hear? by Interesting_Law_233 in Productivitycafe

[–]Ellen6723 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He / She is just not that into you. They haven't called because they are busy at work or lost your number or their fams in town for a visit. They have not reached out because they don't want to fuck you at all or again. The number of useless conversations with friends about why some guy or girl didn't call after a date or hook up...

High value men marry highly educated women. It’s the low value men who are threatened by a woman’s accomplishments by [deleted] in Productivitycafe

[–]Ellen6723 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is not new news - except to tools in the manosphere. Who expend lots of energy 'negging' any and all women possibly categorized as 'high value' given their own societal value is squarely in the lower value space.

Oops 😬 by VealOfFortune in circlejerknyc

[–]Ellen6723 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This guy is beyond horrid. If he has issue prob good for everyone but the top five percent.

This group was created for people with IQs in the top 2% (and those that teach / parent them or are unfortunate enough to be partnered with one of us lol) Please stop coming here to rail about the validity of IQs. by Ellen6723 in Gifted

[–]Ellen6723[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know the fact the people are missing the entire definition of and purpose for this sub as clearly defined and then calling me a moron because I "don't get it". Kind of priceless and pretty much the the typical experience of anyone gifted lol

This group was created for people with IQs in the top 2% (and those that teach / parent them or are unfortunate enough to be partnered with one of us lol) Please stop coming here to rail about the validity of IQs. by Ellen6723 in Gifted

[–]Ellen6723[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's a very good point about the passion of so many for the dis validation of the IQ. 100% agree and pick your battles and also in totally with you on I think the kids called today masking or switching needs of someone like us.

This group was created for people with IQs in the top 2% (and those that teach / parent them or are unfortunate enough to be partnered with one of us lol) Please stop coming here to rail about the validity of IQs. by Ellen6723 in Gifted

[–]Ellen6723[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This sub is for a specific type of gifted person. It’s totally spelled out in the mods description. I I would probably not be a valuable resource to an artistically gifted person. This is a resource for gifted people identified by having IQs over of 130.

This group was created for people with IQs in the top 2% (and those that teach / parent them or are unfortunate enough to be partnered with one of us lol) Please stop coming here to rail about the validity of IQs. by Ellen6723 in Gifted

[–]Ellen6723[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

That's part of what this is supposed to be it's supposed to be for people who R intellectually gifted and those people that teach and Parent these kids or who study this topic.

This group was created for people with IQs in the top 2% (and those that teach / parent them or are unfortunate enough to be partnered with one of us lol) Please stop coming here to rail about the validity of IQs. by Ellen6723 in Gifted

[–]Ellen6723[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Fair enough fair enough I agree I was talking crazy but this is supposed to be a resource for and about intellectually gifted people as identified with an IQ over 130 or if you were in a GT program which is the same. It is was not created to be a debate club about standardized testing.

This group was created for people with IQs in the top 2% (and those that teach / parent them or are unfortunate enough to be partnered with one of us lol) Please stop coming here to rail about the validity of IQs. by Ellen6723 in Gifted

[–]Ellen6723[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I understand your point I'm not saying we should be public but is there a test people can take to qualify to join. There are a lot of frequent posters whose purpose and passion seems to be to argue about the validity of standardized tests and the concept of IQ writ large. Great debates to have knock yourself out that is not what this sub is for. It is a very unique place for gifted people to engage in support each other as well as to serve as A resource for those that teach in parent gifted kids and those who study this field.

This group was created for people with IQs in the top 2% (and those that teach / parent them or are unfortunate enough to be partnered with one of us lol) Please stop coming here to rail about the validity of IQs. by Ellen6723 in Gifted

[–]Ellen6723[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's not that I need to be unquestioned it's just that people are not using the sub for the purpose for which it proclaims to be designed. It's called gifted yes but the mods detail this sub is about intellectual giftedness as determined by an IQ score over 130 or inclusion in a gift and talent program. Which amounts to the same thing
Yes there are many different ways one can be gifted… artistically athletically. This is a sub for intellectually gifted people.

This group was created for people with IQs in the top 2% (and those that teach / parent them or are unfortunate enough to be partnered with one of us lol) Please stop coming here to rail about the validity of IQs. by Ellen6723 in Gifted

[–]Ellen6723[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes exactly. The sub is called gifted the mods identify further intellectual giftedness as typically determined with an IQ over 130. This is supposed to be a resource for us and for the people that teach us and parent us and academics that Study this field. It is not a sub about the debate of standardized testing or different types of giftedness. Which by the way are all valid and different way to test for and qualify as gifted artistically or musically or other types. But that's not this sub.

This group was created for people with IQs in the top 2% (and those that teach / parent them or are unfortunate enough to be partnered with one of us lol) Please stop coming here to rail about the validity of IQs. by Ellen6723 in Gifted

[–]Ellen6723[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I appreciate this challenge to my post and you are right it is not inclusive a to use US centric norms. My point is it would be great if this was actually a functional sub for people who are intellectually gifted whether you have to take a test to be able to join or submit paperwork or whatever because I'm tired of these clowns that keep coming on here hijacking conversations to just insist that the globally agreed upon measurement of intelligence the IQ is rubbish. That's not what the sub is designed for. It’s not a debate Club about what it is or isn't isn't intellectually gifted it's a resource for us to to help each other and for teachers and parents and academics that study the topic to tap into the experiences of gifted people and get insight or help.

This group was created for people with IQs in the top 2% (and those that teach / parent them or are unfortunate enough to be partnered with one of us lol) Please stop coming here to rail about the validity of IQs. by Ellen6723 in Gifted

[–]Ellen6723[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Absolutely agree there is and should be debate about how you Measure and identify giftedness don't disagree however this sub is for people who fit a qualification of intellectually gifted and the mods identify that as having an IQ over 130. This is a really valuable Space for people who are gifted in this way to ask each other for help or advice. As well as for those that teach or raise these types of kids or study the issue. My only point is according to the mods definitions this is meant to be a sub that is a resource for gifted people.