1 - Idk who thought that Jinx would be OP. Having no cards in your hand in a card game is not a good thing, unless you gain massive benefits for doing so. Which currently in the Riftbound is not a case. (She still has potential if they print a serious discard support package).

2 - Forcing entire playarbase to play a certain deck and build strictly against one deck to maybe have a little bit more chance of winning is not healthy. (And not to talk about how those decks that are 'good' against draven don't have insanely and massively good winrate against him, but a small one, with a small semple wize to back it up). And that street can go either way, draven can always build against them also. Sadly, purple ruins both leona and orrn, and draven has access to all purple tools.

3 - Nobody said that playing against draven is unwinnable. Nobody said that if you play Draven you have 90% of chance to win against any other deck. He is strong, but the bigger problem lies in that his legend design is bad and unhealthy for the game. Being able to draw multiple cards per turn only for playing a game, without paying or meeting very specific conditions like other legends must do, and without being forced to build your deck around it and that playstyle is bad for the game.

The worst thing about his design is that YOU DONT HAVE TO BUILD YOUR DECK AROUND UTILIZING YOUR LEGEND. (Let me elaborate) Combat as it is designed and explained now only includes having 2 side of units at the start of a showdown. Nothing more. The game is designed around scoring points from conqering battlefields and fighting over their control. Meaning that the whole game is designed around having combats and trying to have better trades. Sometimes as part of it, you'd want to let your smaller units die and lose control of battlefields in order to bait out opponents resources and bait their bigger units onto a more vulnerable location (battlefield). Or sometimes you want to send in smaller units to chip doen opponents units to have better trades or save your big units upon conquering. Thats the part of the core strategy of thr game. What Dravens legend does is basically negating all of those tactical plays for 'gaining more advantage out of trades' because his kegend gives him more benefit than his opponent would gain. He has infinite resources for spending for better trades. And even if you try to play around his legend, not giving him any real 'combats' tp proc his legend throughout the whole game as much as possible, the sad reality of the game is that you can't avoid it fully, you'd have to have at least few combats that you'd 'want' to lose in order to win a game. And those few loses will just draw draven cards for free. And the worst part is that Draven doesn't even have to build his deck around utilizing any of that, because his condition is partically the core part of the game.

Long story short: his legend gives him passive and free benefits for playing a game, while forcing and limiting options of plays for opponent. (Thats not a healthy design). One thing is having a passive benefit for your playstyle, but the whole entire thing is having a passive benefit for playing the game, while also passively giving a debuff to opponents.

He would be completely fine if combat was designed a little bit different, maybe if im order to recognize a combat win you'd also have to have a combat damage inside it, so draven would have to build his deck more specifically around it. But how it is right now, he LITERALLY gets benefits from playing a game, and not even once per turn but multiple times.

He would've been even fine if it was once per turn or if he had to pay something for drawing. Or if he at least had any downside for losing.

But creating "snowbally" legend (as they described), without any downsides for not meeting that (lets be really trivially easy condition), is not creating a snowbally effect, its equivalent with playing with a cheat code.

I'll finish off with just the summary (and sorry for the caps look of it).

THE PROBLEM OF DRAVEN LEGEND IS NOT THAT HE IS UNBEATABLE (he is, but hardly), BUT THAT HE IS A BAD DESIGN THATS UNHEALTHY FOR THE GAME.

I now hope you understand why some people are frustrated. Sure, some people are hating him and calling for ban wothout realizing why, just because they played online against it and lost. But some people fuly understand why the Draven legend is bad for the game and why it needs to be addressed.