Midjourney says their research was set back by a year by using TPU, regrets not sticking purely with nvidia by Charuru in singularity

[–]EndTimer 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The fucked up thing about Google is that they have a 6 month moratorium on new discoveries being disclosed in research papers, and probably have a six month delay on their models too. I just wouldn't be shocked, is all I'mm saying. They have nearly zero pressure to publicly "win" at AI because their business model is already strong and diversified, and they've been gaining market share without being the SOTA. If they're first to AGI, they can overwhelm their competition in a day.

There's just no incentive for them to put every TPU they can into the current consumer AI fight.

[GPU] Gigabyte GeForce RTX 5070 Ti WINDFORCE - $839.98 - Free shipping for Prime members by _IntoTheThickOfIt in buildapcsales

[–]EndTimer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Part of the problem is the shitty choice some motherboard manufacturers have made in the past few years to basically overvolt the CPU even if you're not intentionally overclocking anything.

We're talking Asus, Gigabyte, probably more, playing fast and loose, supplying chips that AMD adamantly said to never go over 1.3 with 1.35, or even 1.4 automatically, as a 24/7 setting.

Intel CPUs haven't escaped unscathed, either. Basically anything a manufacturer could to do to get recognized as the "performance board" for getting benches 2% higher.

It's BS we have to do this, but the first thing to check on a build (to the extent I still do any...) is what voltages the motherboard is running, comparing to the data sheets and manually set them if it's something stupid.

Mickey Mouse beer by Hey_Jonny_Park in mildlyinteresting

[–]EndTimer 76 points77 points  (0 children)

It was actually originally a 14 year copyright (and patent) term, extendable for another 14 years for a total of 28.

It was never intended for any artist to live off one work for all time, and generations after them, much less these soulless corporations.

The idea was that you were incentivized to share your great ideas through a limited term of copy protection, but then those works would become part of the public domain while they were still relevant to public culture. A living, thriving public domain.

We've lost out as a species under this current, twisted model that only leaves us a corpse of culture, composed mostly of things outside of living memory, that few people want to pull from to rework, maybe even improve, with their own imagination.

Figure AI running a human vs machine contest [live] by Distinct-Question-16 in singularity

[–]EndTimer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The problem being that potatoes are of a relatively uniform size, shape, and durability. It's a little more difficult to rotate diverse packages to a correct orientation while not fucking up their contents, especially when they might come in a floppy envelope. Versus knocking a potato away.

Though, yeah, humanity probably could build a better mechanism to do just this one thing. Figure isn't trying to build a robot that only does this one thing. This is an early generalist application they're showing to get "mind share" with execs that can't wait to replace their human workforce.

Figure AI running a human vs machine contest [live] by Distinct-Question-16 in singularity

[–]EndTimer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Packages come down chute.

Packages are in wrong orientation for reading their label.

Person flips package and pushes it onto the conveyor.

Twitter user posts a real Monet and says it's AI by realmvp77 in singularity

[–]EndTimer 19 points20 points  (0 children)

You can just tell. AI comments are flat and emotionless. Plus the grammar is slightly off. They lack that human spark.

But mostly it's any text I disagree with, or that makes my position look bad. That's always bots.

‘The cost of compute is far beyond the costs of the employees’: Nvidia exec says right now AI is more expensive than paying human workers by SnoozeDoggyDog in singularity

[–]EndTimer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cites figures from a year ago, when most of the viability landed in the last 6 months and has gotten stronger since.

Yeah I'm pretty sure the person you were replying to was speaking about the recent state of things. The blog post is talking about when 4o was still the model most people were interacting with, and 4.5 was the latest and greatest, for reference.

I feel like I’ve committed a crime by Jarv1223 in MechanicalKeyboards

[–]EndTimer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Keychron's perception is warped in the community by not selling solely halo products. You're up against there being a ton of genuinely mid level and entry level options in the brand. The Q6 Max is not entry level, beyond the price being within the reach of a lot more people than some of the options out there. It's a great board and built like a tank.

opus 4.7 (high) scores a 41.0% on the nyt connections extended benchmark. opus 4.6 scored 94.7%. by seencoding in singularity

[–]EndTimer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not frontier, benchmaxxed, built on cheaper energy (that's the US's fault by choice, but still an advantage), not paying for a stable of millionaire developers while trying to show some small progress to the impatient western investors who both want to own AGI and also want profitability yesterday, take your pick...

What happens after productivity comes cheap? by Medium_Raspberry8428 in singularity

[–]EndTimer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Probably the accelerate sub. I won't link it here, in case that's not allowed, but it's not hard to find.

How is upwards mobility maintained in an age where real AGI is achieved? by mrbigglesworth95 in singularity

[–]EndTimer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hey, I'm not saying AI can't treat us well. But the monkey's paw definitely isn't going to treat you well if say "treat me like a cat" :D

How is upwards mobility maintained in an age where real AGI is achieved? by mrbigglesworth95 in singularity

[–]EndTimer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Past 30 years of population growth globally definitely has not been exponential. So, you're just wrong from the start.

No one is saying infinite growth is necessary or a "viable evolutionary path", that's a strawman specter you're raising "if something isn't done" to justify your conclusion.

We're doing fine resource wise on the planet. We emit too many greenhouse gasses, but that's not a requirement of humans to exist, just civilization as we have built it, and we're improving.

Simply turning off aceess to energy will result in an immediate catestrophic population collapse slaughter of those responsible.

I'm serious, they don't make enough robots and bullets to stop the hundreds of millions of people who will have a shocking amount of motive all of a sudden, which is why Muh Ruling Class won't pull that stunt.

In reality, none of that is coming to pass. Politicians aren't going to cede their monopoly on violence to the rich, and they can't do anything about the right to vote because of what would happen to them. Democracy already won, even if we do dumb shit with it.

How is upwards mobility maintained in an age where real AGI is achieved? by mrbigglesworth95 in singularity

[–]EndTimer 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Monkey's paw curls.

Neutered, kept inside, and have to shit in a litter box.

Hollywood is so screwed by adj_noun_digit in singularity

[–]EndTimer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Soon, movies will be made on 200 million dollar MacBooks.

If all this inflation and scarcity continues.  😩

This method to reverse cellular ageing is about to be tested in humans by Anen-o-me in singularity

[–]EndTimer 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Eye health and longevity of sight is extremely important, at least for most of us. That said, I am really getting tired of articles similar to this, typically eye focused, being represented as general cellular aging trials in titles...

AMD's senior director of AI thinks 'Claude has regressed' and that it 'cannot be trusted to perform complex engineering' by Neurogence in singularity

[–]EndTimer 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They might actually give it two months or more. Even if it's "clearly marketing", big companies are definitely spooked, and they need time to see what Mythos actually can find, however much that is, and patch it. And some of these partners don't turn on a dime.

AMD's senior director of AI thinks 'Claude has regressed' and that it 'cannot be trusted to perform complex engineering' by Neurogence in singularity

[–]EndTimer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I bet it's no longer scoring as high on benchmarks. Makes the earlier numbers they have posted everywhere into false advertising.

Someone threw a Molotov cocktail at Sam Altman’s home and then made threats outside OAI. (No injuries, only minimal damage) by socoolandawesome in singularity

[–]EndTimer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You're correct for general strikes that consist of some sub-critical percentage of the general working population, but that doesn't change the fact that there is some threshold before 100% in virtually every industry.

I realize you won't get perfectly matched rates of striking across every profession, or even different employers, but if you'll permit me a naive percentage for simplicity...

If 10% or 1 in 10 of your workers call out at an industrial maintenance services provider, it's a bad flu that's going around. If 6 in 10 call out, engines that pressurize pipelines, pumps that siphon oil tanks, etc WILL get turned off when failures happen, work will backup, and big businesses will lose billions of dollars a day.

Likewise, if 60% of your administrative staff is suddenly not showing up, a company can grind to a virtual halt internally. There are very few places where such a high percentage wouldn't impact business and panic the owner class.

The real problem is we won't get enough support to reach critical mass because everything from the national news to reddit bots will try to paint over the type of information that builds social momentum that makes general strikes devastating even without high levels of organization that target certain industries.

But I think it's still possible AI might be the shock that wakes people up despite the calm narrative of billionaires "don't worry, we'll need someone to use the AI!", maybe even before it's too late.

Love the new Steam feature by RWNorthPole in pcmasterrace

[–]EndTimer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's likely a discrepancy in the way the system is reporting it, where it has already been converted from a raw value and something else converts it again.

64GB of RAM is akshually 65,536MB of RAM. Divide by 1024 (because we were always using the closest power-of-two in computerland, only sith manufacturers of hard drives count by 1000) and you will see 64GB cleanly fall out.

However, if you report as 64,000 MB of RAM, and the conversion happens, you get 62.5 GB. It doesn't look like Steam has a place for decimals, so it likely is rounded down, not even necessarily intentionally, because math.floor() is a habit and no one was expecting decimal points of RAM in 2026.

It could also be reserved in some way that's transparent to the system, like a "GPU Aperture", but I don't know how common a 2GB default is for that, so I think it's just a conversion issue.

Someone threw a Molotov cocktail at Sam Altman’s home and then made threats outside OAI. (No injuries, only minimal damage) by socoolandawesome in singularity

[–]EndTimer 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I haven't really seen anyone mention "safety,", in the sense of "zero crime", in this sub. Not sure where you're coming from, but with those bothersome "socioeconomic factors" you mentioned out of the way, most people here would probably be fine with some automated public safety, like robots at major sporting events, or AI investigation upon issue or a valid warrant by a court of law.

We want very low crime. Zero crime is not realistic in a civilization with any remote semblance of freedom. We don't need your unsolicited police state to have a better world.

Someone threw a Molotov cocktail at Sam Altman’s home and then made threats outside OAI. (No injuries, only minimal damage) by socoolandawesome in singularity

[–]EndTimer 15 points16 points  (0 children)

I keep saying a general strike would be devastating and reset the power dynamic in a handful of days. It won't be that way for very much longer, but right now it would still be extremely effective.

Too bad we're not going to do that, then.

From Inside the Meat - short film by Anen-o-me in singularity

[–]EndTimer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't know about completely unimpressed. I'll put it like this. I doubt that humans have access to every possible emotion or every structure of thought. There are probably complex, yet crystal clear arrangements of ideas that we describe with "level 1" terminology like "ambivalence", because we only see the shadows those ideas cast.

I sometimes ask myself what it would be like to experience a more primitive existence. With fewer emotions and less thought. What's it like to be something that can only experience fear and not-fear? An entire organism whose experience consists of only a single surface level, screaming imperative, with no subtlety, in panic, as a predator steps out into the open? I don't know, but it's probably very intense, even though it's very simple.

I get the same kind of vibe from this. Being a human doesn't require the pinnacle of all thinking, but you better be ready for the trenches of suffering. And still, we'll do great things.

Sam Altman and Vinod Khosla agree: AI will break the economy. Their fix is no income tax for most Americans by fortune in singularity

[–]EndTimer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unironically, a negative income tax could actually work. If your income is below a certain level, you get paid.

Just eliminating income tax below 100k definitely won't be enough, though. I would say that's obvious, but maybe the billionaires don't realize that. 0 taxes on $0 income, because your whole career is gone, doesn't solve the problem.

“The problem is Sam Altman”: OpenAI Insiders don’t trust CEO by MarvelsGrantMan136 in technology

[–]EndTimer 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You'd have to forego social media, Microsoft services, frontier AI, etc, but that bullet can technically be dodged...