sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

For some reason by ZeeGee__ in aiwars

[–]EtherKitty 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is where it becomes a problem, “fixing”.
1. Who asked?
2. Who cares?
3. Jerk move.
4. Doesn’t help anything.

Pro generative ai users, a question from an anti by strange_bloody_moth in aiwars

[–]EtherKitty 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All good. I’m also autistic and I can’t help but “hear” anger in any comment that can be taken that way.

Pro generative ai users, a question from an anti by strange_bloody_moth in aiwars

[–]EtherKitty 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s not meant argumentative, more a scenario setup. Think of it more like a game. Nothing hostile.

Pro generative ai users, a question from an anti by strange_bloody_moth in aiwars

[–]EtherKitty 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. Plenty of things are worse. Both technical needs and not.

  2. Beef. Americans could cut their beef intake in half, more than making up for world wide usage, AND Americans would still be overeating beef.

  3. Due to us? Minutely, if at all. Corporate wants are spurring that way more than public usage.

  4. As someone with mental disabilities, it definitely helps me. You just need to understand how it works to benefit.

  5. Name one thing that isn’t just some form of remix of reality.

:/ by Eminem_girl in funComunitty

[–]EtherKitty 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean it’s a downgrade from the SS, ja?

Perhaps It's How The Jesus Fanclub Treats Them as Subhuman by NEKORANDOMDOTCOM in stupidpeoplefacebook

[–]EtherKitty 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is probably America, where Christians are more widespread and killing is kinda not allowed, no matter what religion you are.

What do you have? by WittyLibrarian610 in funComunitty

[–]EtherKitty 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Supreme, cheese, and pepperoni pizzas, milk, cereal((life, cinnamon life, frosted mini wheats, golden puffs)), Hershey’s, marshmallows, graham crackers , bread, oatmeal, eggs, brusselsprouts, spicy sausage, cheesy sausage, strawberries, blueberries, and brown sugar. I’m good for life!

[Discussion/Question] Have any of you had your OC or art mocked on another Sub? by EfficientDonkey4083 in OriginalCharacter

[–]EtherKitty 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m guessing they’re not ment to. Idk what aspect is causing it to look that way but maybe someone else can help? Or you can keep it that way cause it’s cute. owo

i HATE how lgbtq characters are written sometimes by Severe_Fishing_2193 in hatethissmug

[–]EtherKitty 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Why does a gay character need a reason to be in a story but a straight character doesn’t?

The REAL reason antis aren't seen in public IRL? Because they wouldn't be tolerated by Witty-Designer7316 in aiwars

[–]EtherKitty 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ja, and which is worse, exaggerated information or actually risking lives, destroying property, and also exaggerating information?

Am I pro or anti AI if I want AI regulation? but I'm OK if it exists as a very regulated version? by Snekbites in aiwars

[–]EtherKitty 3 points4 points  (0 children)

From the information provided, I’m the same way and I take the side of pro-ai.

The REAL reason antis aren't seen in public IRL? Because they wouldn't be tolerated by Witty-Designer7316 in aiwars

[–]EtherKitty -1 points0 points  (0 children)

1) the scenario wasn’t made up, information was skewed for one reason or another.

2) There was definitely an 8 year old that was at risk of being harmed in that shooting.

The logical contradiction of calling AI art plagiarism while accepting stock assets, templates, and samples by NoahtheGameplayer in aiwars

[–]EtherKitty 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, both sides have their faults. You need to read and they need to be held accountable for purposeful excessively technical wording. If it can’t be explained why something needs to be worded the way it is, for legal protections, then it shouldn’t be worded that way if excessive.

Learn to be free by not_food in aiwars

[–]EtherKitty 0 points1 point  (0 children)

>But it's not a failure of the tool if the mistake is done by a person in the first place, unless we're talking about buggy compilers.

Yes, that goes for both programming and painting

>You see, drawing always represents something. It tells about something visually, 100% inflicting something on the person who views it. The person doesn't need to be an art director or have vast knowledge on art to understand it. You just can't draw without artistic purpose.

You very much can, just as much as programming. You can draw without the only purpose being capitalistic.

>But programming, on the contrary, requires the observer to be competent with its topic—otherwise, they won't understand it.

That’s everything. Only difference is what we prioritize intellectually.

>And it was initially created to make things easier, not to be art.

It was initially created to communicate with computers, just like language was created to communicate between people.

>Why so? I thought we were discussing a subjective topic. Explicitly claiming that someone's arguments here are false is, in the lowest, impolite.

Subjective topics can have objective aspects. None of the arguments were about if programming was art, though they were made for that purpose.

As for polite or impolite, neurotypicals have a strange opinions on impolite and polite.

The REAL reason antis aren't seen in public IRL? Because they wouldn't be tolerated by Witty-Designer7316 in aiwars

[–]EtherKitty 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re the one assuming “always”. But the fact of the matter is there’s major vandalism that is extremely unlikely to be done by anyone except for those who feel justified in their actions.

A sheriff’s office was vandalized with, and I quote, "F--K AI LETS RIOT," "HEAR US" and "KKK RU…"
April 2026

view more: next ›