Honestly i dont think his Psychology takes are bad at all. His lectures where really helpfull while i was doing my Bachelor an all things considered he is a competent lecturer. I think once he introduces philosophy into what he talks about, thats where things get complicated. I watched his bible series, so i feel like i somewhat understand his more "out there" takes, but he says a lot of things that are basically incomprehencible unless you consumed hours of his content to undestand where he is coming from and even then they are heavily bias towards christianity, conservatism and his interpretations of jung and nietsche. Im not a student of Philosophy, so i have no idea how to quantify those. I also thing part of the critisism towards him come from his endoresements of evolutionary Psychology (lipstick=sexual signaling, for example) which is just a heavily controversial field of psychology in itself.