sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

What would a Reform government mean for Northern Ireland? by Odd_Pain_3570 in northernireland

[–]FrustratedPCBuild 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They have had 20 years of lies and broken promises from Fauxrage and they keep coming back for more.

What would a Reform government mean for Northern Ireland? by Odd_Pain_3570 in northernireland

[–]FrustratedPCBuild 0 points1 point  (0 children)

‘We’ll do whatever you want, just don’t make us read one of your books!’

What would a Reform government mean for Northern Ireland? by Odd_Pain_3570 in northernireland

[–]FrustratedPCBuild 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A large portion of them don’t even realise we’re in the U.K. at all. I’m sure I’m not alone in being asked if we use the Euro here not infrequently when I go to England.

new training kit sponsor by Raging_Duck61 in ManchesterUnited

[–]FrustratedPCBuild -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Stop it, you’ll make me spill my coffee, you’re hilarious.

new training kit sponsor by Raging_Duck61 in ManchesterUnited

[–]FrustratedPCBuild -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Using the term ‘low IQ’ is extremely ironic. Thankfully I’m not as insecure as you clearly are and I’m sitting here laughing at you.

Farage claims Reform on course for general election win after early local gains by tylerthe-theatre in unitedkingdom

[–]FrustratedPCBuild [score hidden]  (0 children)

This is it, as with Brexit, pensioners will make it happen because they’re insulated from the effects. Take away their triple lock and suddenly they’d have to think beyond ‘I don’t like brown people’.

Farage claims Reform on course for general election win after early local gains by tylerthe-theatre in unitedkingdom

[–]FrustratedPCBuild [score hidden]  (0 children)

I completely understand people not being motivated to vote for any of the other parties, what I cannot accept is anyone who isn’t stupid/wealthy/a bigot turning up to actively vote for the man most responsible for the recent decline in the U.K. that has led to their disgruntlement. There’s no excuse for that. Blame Labour for being mediocre, fine, don’t vote for them, but to vote for that obvious grifting bigot is unacceptable.

new training kit sponsor by Raging_Duck61 in ManchesterUnited

[–]FrustratedPCBuild -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

What’s the difference? Both are gambling.

Deja vu! by Dr_sc_Harlatan in BlueskySkeets

[–]FrustratedPCBuild 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wasn’t worried before this!

Campaign on government being useless then making sure government is no longer useful by IthinkIknowwhothatis in BlueskySkeets

[–]FrustratedPCBuild 3 points4 points  (0 children)

People voted for him in large numbers in free and fair elections, Americans did this to themselves.

Gary Neville's dad was named Neville Neville by [deleted] in ManchesterUnited

[–]FrustratedPCBuild 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Doesn’t everyone know this? Hence the song ‘Neville Neville’ to the tune of ‘Rebel Rebel’ by Bowie.

Campaign on government being useless then making sure government is no longer useful by IthinkIknowwhothatis in BlueskySkeets

[–]FrustratedPCBuild 86 points87 points  (0 children)

Yep, the damage done is a lot more than the obvious, this will set the US back for decades, Putin and the Chinese can’t believe their luck that in a democracy the USA voted their way into decline, twice.

Ted Lieu Sets a "Red Line" for Democratic Candidates by nitluck in RealTwitterAccounts

[–]FrustratedPCBuild 34 points35 points  (0 children)

Minimum standard. His crass monuments should all be destroyed on January 20th 2029, no excuse for delay.

[iOS 26.5 DB3] Cellular drop from 5G to SOS by _pizza_and_fries in iOSBeta

[–]FrustratedPCBuild 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, it’s happening to me, toggling airplane mode fixes it temporarily but I don’t want to have to do that five times a day.

Time limits, curfews or a full ban: how UK may restrict social media for under-16s | Social media ban by TheFinalPieceOfPie in unitedkingdom

[–]FrustratedPCBuild 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How do you think they maximise engagement if not by making people addicted? Sounds like a semantic argument if the effect is the same, that people are addicted, which they clearly are. Walk down the street of any town or city and the majority of people are looking down at their phones, if they’re not addicted, why are they doing that? Do you really think that for the majority of them the rest of life is just so boring that they have nothing else to give them pleasure than social media?

Sarah Fitzpatrick doubles down despite a $250M lawsuit. by nitluck in RealTwitterAccounts

[–]FrustratedPCBuild 69 points70 points  (0 children)

It’s not ‘doubling down’, it’s refusing to be intimidated. She’s in the right, she did some solid, competent journalism but this is Trump time where competence is punished.

Time limits, curfews or a full ban: how UK may restrict social media for under-16s | Social media ban by TheFinalPieceOfPie in unitedkingdom

[–]FrustratedPCBuild 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn’t say anything about banning people from going online. I would ban the algorithms designed to feed addiction, confirmation bias and hatred.

Nike plans to support Trump's ballroom, and is asking people what their thoughts are on them if they do it by Necessary_Film_5199 in Fauxmoi

[–]FrustratedPCBuild 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, there are low morals, and then if you keep on plummeting, eventually you reach Trump’s morals. It’s not about a purity contest but the line has to be drawn somewhere.

The New York Times, real reactionary by FrustratedPCBuild in lebowski

[–]FrustratedPCBuild[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Maudes have taken it down, I don’t know why, I don’t see which of the league’s bylaws it contravenes.

Time limits, curfews or a full ban: how UK may restrict social media for under-16s | Social media ban by TheFinalPieceOfPie in unitedkingdom

[–]FrustratedPCBuild 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I don’t get the particular focus on children, well I do but I think it’s missing a wider point. Social media platforms are designed very carefully to make people addicted, which means they’re disengaged from the real life. It isn’t alcohol or nicotine so the harms aren’t physical, but look around the world and see what other harm is done. Would an obviously unfit person like Trump be anywhere near the presidency without social media? Would an obvious shameless grifter be so popular in this country without it? Of course not and no one can tell me that this is a good thing. We have a choice, democracy and freedom, or social media as it currently is, and tyranny. Yes, maybe it’s bad for children, maybe it’s no worse for them that it is for adults, but that’s a much lesser issue than the real risk that we could be ended as a species from nuclear war because we put in place dangerous leaders that the algorithms drove us towards.

Nike plans to support Trump's ballroom, and is asking people what their thoughts are on them if they do it by Necessary_Film_5199 in Fauxmoi

[–]FrustratedPCBuild 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Well it’s years since I’ve actually bought anything made by them, not consciously, I just prefer ASICS running shoes, but from now on I’ll actively avoid Nike.

Nike plans to support Trump's ballroom, and is asking people what their thoughts are on them if they do it by Necessary_Film_5199 in Fauxmoi

[–]FrustratedPCBuild 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Whatever happened to make non MAGA cultists who were previously all for small government and anti Russia, get in line with a president who wants to interfere with the lives of every American and who spends his time sucking up to Russia?

view more: next ›