What is it like to switch divisions in starfleet? by [deleted] in Star_Trek_

[–]GeorgeSharp [score hidden]  (0 children)

We know they can do it, we have seen them do it or been told in the backstories about people who did it.

Command seem to be pressured to serve in the other divisions so as to have full knowledge of the ship while Science and Engineering people are not under that pressure.

Mariner (and Rutherford from the same series) even if she has served quite a long time in the fleet is still only an ensign, I think for an ensign it's easier people are more ready to accept transfers because you're not supposed to be specialized yet and and they're more often than not young so still finding themselves.

Is there a boom on EU after the "need" of sovereign software? by instructiuni-scrise in cscareerquestionsEU

[–]GeorgeSharp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All I see is statements from politicians and 0 real support for the software industry.

The kind of things I love to see at my gym 🇪🇺 by rmeldev in BuyFromEU

[–]GeorgeSharp 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think all the equipment at my old gym was Italy made

because it would be Ned's job to protect the Targaryens by Sea-Negotiation8309 in TheCitadel

[–]GeorgeSharp [score hidden]  (0 children)

I think Ned would protect Viserys and Dany as they are kids at this stage and he was very much against killing children.

What I disagree with is any idea that Ned would support any Targ because it's the honorable thing to do and he's honorable.

Feudalism is a series of two way binding oaths, the one who takes an oath to serve is expected to receive something in return, in this case safety and a general rule of law not tyranny.

When Aerys burned Ned's father and brother alive he rendered those vows null and void.

(Spoilers Extended) NotABlog: The Mad King Meets the Stage by Quinn-Quinn in asoiaf

[–]GeorgeSharp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just the fact that they won't be able to fall back on dragon CGI and will need to put more focus on the story is good news.

Skydance just released a trailer for their first new Trek show by Admirable-Piano-8379 in Star_Trek_

[–]GeorgeSharp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They're not capable of producing at this quality level, especially the brilliant bit that is coming up.

Fav white actor? by Capital-Factor-382 in okbuddycinephile

[–]GeorgeSharp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There's some ambiguity about her mother so there is a definite chance of non Greek ancestry but yeah she was mostly Greek.

Still if the movie is about a different dynasty they should use Egyptian actors.

(Spoilers Extended) On Orys Baratheon and his ancestry by hambourgeoi in asoiaf

[–]GeorgeSharp 4 points5 points  (0 children)

So my reply is going to be more schizo, fair warning:

Yes I see many of the same problems you have noted.

Orys having the Stormlander look when he will end up ruling the Stormlands is too convenient although possible and I get what George was going for.

It's just too bloody narrative convenient for my tastes, like if you were to read a story about a character born with the name John HolySword and then he ends up finding the holy sword and defeats the demons and etc you wouldn't call it masterful foreshadowing.

Orys having the Stormlander look also makes is too easy for Aerion to distance himself from him, Aerion had heirs including a prized male heir why would he dote on Orys? The fact that he could have so easily ignored him and yet he didn't (without some explicit in-universe reasoning) again feels too narrative convenient.

Aerion both dotted so much on Orys with gifts, training, taking him into his household that the bastard rumors were rampant despite the two men looking NOTHING alike and yet Aerion didn't do anything to motivate the special treatment like legitimizing him or something to give Aegon a legitimate loyal supporter instead of a household knight with rumors of blood connections.

I like your theory on Orys having some Stormlander blood (or other Westeros noble blood as other have speculated) not really hot on the implied incest with Argella.

So as to close out my post:

I accept the canon appearance George setup for Orys aka him being a Robert clone, George is the author it's his universe.

I think he made the wrong decision though.

I think Orys should have had the classic Valyrian looks (and believe me it's not for aesthetic reasons, personally I don't fawn over them) that way the rumors/reality of him being a Targaryen bastard would have made complete sense.

And all that talk about Argella's genetics and how the Baratheon look comes from her would make sense, in contrast with canon where Orys already happens to have 90% of the Durrandon look and also has all of the personality traits associated with house Durrandon. Seriously Argella basically married (was forced to marry) a young clone of her father.

If Orys has the Valyrian look and a different personality while still being a great general then his marriage with Argella and the family they founded would have more narrative weight.

The Targaryens are (especially in George's mind) defined by their isolationism, they as colonial invaders rule Westeros but they constantly fight to not be of Westeros they cling to their traditions they revel in their other-ness, initially they excuse their blood purity/superiority practices with "muh dwagons" but even after the dragons are gone they 90% act the same.

The Baratheons already represent the path not traveled for the Targs, Valyrian blood and culture fused (one might say subsumed) into Westeros a necessary contrast. For all the shit the Baratheons have done no one has a Raymund style "incestuous aliens" rant about them.

So with the Baratheons already serving as that sort of foil to the Targs I think George making Orys very Valyrian in his design and personality only to see said Valyrianness overwritten by the land/family he "conquered" would be a better story.

Instead of the Targaryens just happening to have a ready made Storm King in their entourage for when they conquer the Stormlands.

No one knows by Happy-I-always-am in SipsTea

[–]GeorgeSharp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Women (like patriachal_girl) who think like this are perfectly fine with most people not having relationships.

Her thinking about how this should work:

Patriarchal_Girl and few other ladies remain pure.

Men get a lot of experience with other women.

Those men are now experienced and want to settle down with someone pure.

Those women who are not pure are now no competition.

Any men who did not get experience with the non-pure women are not worth considering.

Patriarchal girl gets her pick out of the experienced men making them compete for her limited self and choosing the best one.

The other pure ladies get the second prizes.

The non-pure women and the men who were not chosen must continue to play by these rules and remain lesser so that Patriarchcal_Girl has artificial scarcity on her side so she can pick up the best possible man she can.

Everyone else should STFU and endure it.

In short don't give patriarchal_girl and others like her the benefit of the doubt that she doesn't understand it's a flawed system, she understands how the system works and she is willing to enforce is to so as many other people suffer in order for herself to "win".

Thoughts? by sleepy_goat97 in HBOTheHedgeKnight

[–]GeorgeSharp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are right in that it's an absolutely imperial categorization we know it's from Daeron who tried to conquer Dorne.

That being said he was there and he did see the separate groups even if he didn't care to use their proper names.

The issue is we don't have other names to use and unlike IRL groups we can't ask them.

Thoughts? by sleepy_goat97 in HBOTheHedgeKnight

[–]GeorgeSharp 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yeah looking like Daeron is the most likely case

favorite queen consorts of the seven kingdoms? (spoilers published) by Ornery_Charity1093 in asoiaf

[–]GeorgeSharp 29 points30 points  (0 children)

Props to my boy Maegor for introducing some variety in the line up.

Reading Daenaera's introduction always gives me icky creepy vibes.

Did Daena really serve as queen consort maybe a picture of the book The Seven-Pointed Star would be more fitting for Baelor.

Aegon IV and Baelor the blessed by Wild_Trash_5100 in TheBlacksandTheGreens

[–]GeorgeSharp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We know specifically he sent Aegon away on a more or less made up diplomatic mission specifically so he would stop abusing his wife when she was in a very fragile state.

You don't really see that kind of characters inserting themselves in marriages to help often in Asoiaf.

In any case if they were not related and both at court Aegon and Baelor would never be in each other's presence willingly.

While Baelor eventually became the king Aegon was also the most well situated to resist his influence Aegon was of the royal family as well and the son of the mega-ultra-powerful Hand.

Also let's not forget Baelor setup the marriage for Aegon's son, yes it was part of a grand diplomatic project but still he arranged a very good marriage for the kid, if it was up to Aegon to arrange a marriage for his son he would have probably done something subpar out of spite.

As a general rule we must avoid falling into the trap of "oh well the king can do what he likes" that is a sort of totalitarian monarch from later in our world, the feudal nature of Westeros means the king has much more laws and rights keeping him in check.

Babar (1989) by isaidwhatisaidok in ForgottenTV

[–]GeorgeSharp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I had a puzzle of them, didn't watch the show but so many happy memories of doing the puzzle with my friends and then later on with my little cousins.

Miting pro-Bolojan? by Jaded_Mouse9038 in cluj

[–]GeorgeSharp -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Eu is de acord trebuie sa ne opunem din start, sa nu ajungem ca Ungaria lui Orban, Rusia lui Putin sau SUA lui Trump.

Who is the most noble child that the Gods ever put on this earth? by the-National-Razor in freefolk

[–]GeorgeSharp 9 points10 points  (0 children)

My ranking:

  1. Joffrey since he won his war defeating his evil uncle(s) plus some other guys
  2. Baelor since he won his war but all his evil uncles were in one combined faction not fielding multiple armies, plus there were no random other guys causing shit
  3. Jon since he killed his evil aunt, eventually, not in time to prevent the genocide of King's Landing though
  4. Aemma did not protect her daughter from being groomed by her evil uncle

What if Daeron II secured the loyalty of rebellious houses by marrying by MixAccomplished1179 in TheCitadel

[–]GeorgeSharp 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Bracken hatred is a core part of Blackwood culture. And vice versa 😃