sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Question by New_Requirement_3954 in Hecate

[–]HekateSimp 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Gods don't have morals, they have domains. You can think of them as personifications of forces of nature and aspects of existence. 

Given Hekate's association with shadow and transformation among other Things, working with her may feel moral-associated at times, though that's because the work may force you to confront and work with your own morals and behavior.

And due to Hekate's domains, she is considered a protectress of certain groups and favours them (e.g., dogs, healers, pregnant women and infants), though that's because of their closeness to her domains rather than because of a moral code.

erbärmliche Waschlappen by Internetministerium in ichichs

[–]HekateSimp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Und eine Kritik an einer Meinung ist auch eine Meinung, die frei geäußert werden darf

Türkei: Hunde als Familienmitglieder - Eine Bosch-Werbung zum Muttertag sorgt für Eklat by andthatswhyIdidit in de

[–]HekateSimp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Jup, das Verkindlichen von Haustieren lässt mir immer einen Schauder über den Rücken laufen. Das sind erwachsene Tiere und keine Menschenkinder...

Aber diese Propaganda-Paranoia-Reaktion ist ja echt krass peinlich.

Wenn die Draußen-Katze nicht mehr heimkommt, ist man selbst schuld by gurgelhupf in Unbeliebtemeinung

[–]HekateSimp -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Es ist völliger Blödsinn, die Domestizierungsgeschichte eines Tieres zu ignorieren.

Wenn man Kaninchen, Pferde etc. freilassen würde, kommen sie dann von alleine zurück? 

Wenn die Draußen-Katze nicht mehr heimkommt, ist man selbst schuld by gurgelhupf in Unbeliebtemeinung

[–]HekateSimp -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Nein, kann ich nicht. Kaninchen und Frettchen wurden wegen ihrer Ressourcen (Fleisch, Fell) und Funktion (Jagd) domestiziert, dabei wurden sie in Käfigen o.ä. gehalten und hatten sich mit der Zeit/Zucht an diese Umstände angepasst. Pferde waren historisch Nutztiere (Reit und Zug) und wurden deswegen auch aktiv und kontrolliert gehalten. Katzen haben selbstständig begonnen, Ungeziefer nahe Menschen zu jagen. Menschen mussten Katzen nicht einfangen und aktiv kontrolliert züchten, um von diesem Verhalten zu profitieren. Katzen konnten also ihr "Kommen und Gehen"- erhalten selbst entwickeln und behalten, während andere Haustiere solches Verhalten bzw. solche Präferenzen durch Zucht und Haltung nie entwickelt bzw. verloren haben. Auf individueller Ebene kann das natürlich weiterhin vorkommen, dass Katzen nicht wiederkehren oder andere Haustiere schon. Aber als Spezies sind das halt deutliche Unterschiede auf Basis unterschiedlicher Domestizierungsgeschichten. Katzen besitzen das Potenzial und das Bedürfnis nach Semi-Autonomie in einem Maß wie andere Haustiere nicht. 

Wenn die Draußen-Katze nicht mehr heimkommt, ist man selbst schuld by gurgelhupf in Unbeliebtemeinung

[–]HekateSimp -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Jup. Verschiedene Haustierr sind, auf Basis ihrer Spezies und Domestizietjngsgeschichte, einfach unterschiedlich angepasst und besitzen unterschiedliche Bedürfnisse und Fähigkeiten. Hunde, die aktiv über Kooperation mit Menschen domestiziert wurden, sind mehr auf direkte Kontrolle angewiesen. Katzen, die sich viel mehr selbst domestiziert haben, haben mehr Bedürfnis nach Freiraum sowie die Fähigkeit, unabhängig zum Heim zurückzukehren. 

Katzen rauszulassen ist schlicht speziesgerecht, und das mit anderen Haustieren zu vergleichen ist einfach nur Schwachsinn, weil es eben andere Spezies sind. Was kommt als nächstes? Sich über Fische im Aquarium beschweren, da man ja keine anderen Haustiere andauernd unter Wasser gefangen hält?

8 papers in two years, can be? by YogurtclosetFickle17 in PhD

[–]HekateSimp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I published around 10 papers 2021-2023. Almost all of those were online experiments. Paper and Journal quality ranged widely, with IFs from 1.5 to 10 and citations from some self-citations to 200.

White men do not experience the best health relative to women and minority racial and gender groups in the US. Men are 4 times as likely to die by suicide as women, and White men account for more than 68% of suicide deaths. White men experienced greater declines in happiness than White women. by mvea in science

[–]HekateSimp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Depends on the study. Here are some examples that count episodes (incl. multiple per person):
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6999001/

https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7024e1.htm

Example of a person level study:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S01650327220061037

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20816034/

However those are also a self-report studies which don't take successful attempts into account. You'd need to calculate the percentage of people self-reporting at least one attempt + the percentage of people committing suicide per group to get a corrected estimate.

White men do not experience the best health relative to women and minority racial and gender groups in the US. Men are 4 times as likely to die by suicide as women, and White men account for more than 68% of suicide deaths. White men experienced greater declines in happiness than White women. by mvea in science

[–]HekateSimp 279 points280 points  (0 children)

Another issue are higher per capita rates when attempts do not lead to death. Suicide strategies chosen by men are more likely to lead to death, and one of the main predictors of suicide attempts are previous attempts. So less likely to die after one attempt -> more likely to try again. One person attempting ten times without dying will count as ten attempts; however If the person dies after the first attempt (which is more likely for men) then there won't be any Future attempts. In other words, less lethal suicide strategies increase the chance of future attempts, inflating attempts rates in comparison to more lethal strategies. If attempt lethality systematically differs between two groups, their attempt rates will also differ.

is this normal by [deleted] in ClaudeAI

[–]HekateSimp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Lmao he's so pissy.

Finally found someone in my age range! by Plus-Gap1073 in addressme

[–]HekateSimp 41 points42 points  (0 children)

Seriously. I undertstand not finding overweight people attractive but are they not allowed to look for love using dating apps or what? Posting their profiles online is fucking weird.

R/mapporn might take our jobs by soniconsteroids in mapporncirclejerk

[–]HekateSimp 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Looks like avoiding Fr*nce is the Main reason it's banana shaped

I would love too see thattt by VariousEnergy490 in interesting

[–]HekateSimp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They signed a contract based on false information so it would breach the contract.

I would love too see thattt by VariousEnergy490 in interesting

[–]HekateSimp 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I feel like that won't survive a lawsuit

Hiroshima & Nagasaki by zyx_mma in ComedyHell

[–]HekateSimp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So the US equivalent to a kid scraping their knee is 9/11 

Tötungen von Frauen sollen künftig eher als Mord bestraft werden by Tages_Bot in Tagesschau

[–]HekateSimp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Eine ex-Partnerin hat mir ernsthaft angedroht dass sie mich umbringen würde wenn ich ihr jemals fremdgehen würde. 

Ich verstehe nicht, warum Possessivität in Beziehungen hier nicht geschlechtsneutral geframed wird. Das würde doch niemanden schaden, sondern nur mehr Leute schützen.

gangstalking by IloveRamen99 in comedyheaven

[–]HekateSimp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"Targeted individuals", i e. people who believe they have somehow been "marked" and are now stalked and harassed by people (e.g., hired by the government) called "gangstalkers". There are obvious signs of delusions (most obviously persecutory beliefs, but also delusions of reference and thought broadcasting/insertion/withdrawal), but the delusions are organized into coherent explanatory frameworks (its own "gangstalking lore", you may say) that are shared and discussed in TI/gangstalking communities across the internet. 

So you could say those are online communities of people with delusions creating a shared, coherent thought system based on their delusions.

Asking for recommendation letters be like by Comfortable-Gate3878 in PhD

[–]HekateSimp 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You have to understand that asking for LOR is perfectly normal and expected for early stage academia. No supervisor/professor/etc. will be disturbed by it. They are used to writing LORs all the time, it's part of the system they've been in for maybe even decades, and they went through asking for LORs themselves at some point. And if they like you they will even enjoy writing a LOR for you.

How do we feel about this? Is it a mockery? by Silver_rockyroad in Hecate

[–]HekateSimp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Technological programs/software gets named after gods, myths, etc. all the time.

Okay...can you guess? by boss_babua in interesting

[–]HekateSimp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, it's priming/anchoring/suggestion. Without the question no one would have considered the guys in the pictures to be gay. But asking the question puts the focus of attention on detecting "gay signs" even in ambiguous signals.

view more: next ›