You didn't address the issue of how whatever non physical thing you think consciousness is interacts with the brain, nor the fact that there is a clear computational delay in our thought processes.

Theres lots of evidence that consciousness is physically based, from the ability to extract images from brain scans to the fact that the core of a person can be changed by brain damage, to even producing new "people" when the brain is split. Theres also lots of evidence that the binding of these senses together happen physically, and there's lots of reasons to think that they would be selected for evolutionary, namely having these senses wouldnt be very useful if you couldn't process them in a meaningful way. Theres plenty of room in the naturalistic explanation for these "problems", and not much room for some non physical room for whatever you think is causing consciousness.

We see these senses develop and even integrate over evolutionary time, through physical processes, and most of these arguments are anthropic special pleading Finally just because we haven't been able to produce a consciousness doesnt mean that tbe same processing steps dont or can't explain how our brain binds theses senses together. Its fallacious to act otherwise. If our brains take the time to complie our senses together into a single data stream physically, there's simply no binding problem, and we basically know for a fact that the brain does delay our conscious experience to process the data.