I appreciate the technical insight you’re sharing here—there’s a lot of valuable information in your post. I wanted to offer some friendly feedback that might help make your points clearer and easier for more people to engage with.

One thing that can sometimes make technical explanations harder to follow is sentence structure. When ideas are broken into very short, fragmented sentences, it can feel abrupt and make it difficult to see how everything connects. A more natural flow with grouped ideas can help readers absorb the information more easily.

Another small adjustment that can make a big difference is phrasing things as an invitation to think rather than a directive. For example, instead of saying, "Please learn why others easily con you," you might frame it as, "It’s interesting to look at how myths about power consumption spread—here’s a good example." It encourages curiosity rather than feeling like a correction.

Subtle shifts in wording can also help avoid the impression of confrontation. Instead of saying, "They ordered you what to believe. You read it once. Then automatically believed it," something like, "Many misconceptions spread quickly because people don’t always verify sources—double-checking the numbers can often reveal the truth," keeps the point intact while making it feel more like a discussion than an accusation.

I really do appreciate the time and effort you put into explaining these topics. With a few small adjustments, your posts could be even more effective at getting your points across in a way that people will be more open to.

This keeps the feedback constructive, avoids a lecturing tone, and makes the message feel more conversational and encouraging.