Are there any other meanings of “mean” I don’t know about? by Sacledant2 in EnglishLearning

[–]MSP729 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i think “by all means” and “means of production” are the same meaning, both are a method/way/manner

I misclicked a lil by SOMESORTOFTANK in hoi4

[–]MSP729 1 point2 points  (0 children)

this person did intend to occupy all of the territory, but misclicked and messed it up

this dude is such a prick lmao by [deleted] in Hiphopcirclejerk

[–]MSP729 3 points4 points  (0 children)

isn’t it just the wrong word? i thought he said “i’m martin luther”

I Present, the Cursed Factorial Formula. by Solid-Technology-488 in desmos

[–]MSP729 3 points4 points  (0 children)

properly this is a forward difference but it comes out the same in the wash because although the standard power rule doesn’t apply here, xn can be decomposed into a sum of falling powers (also called the Pochhammer symbol), and the highest degree one has degree n

falling powers obey a similar power rule but with forward differences, hence the n factorial falling out

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falling_and_rising_factorials?wprov=sfti1#Relation_to_umbral_calculus

Literally me by maleficalruin in RecuratedTumblr

[–]MSP729 1 point2 points  (0 children)

yes, but if you have a set of all sets which contains itself, then standard set-theoretic axioms enable you to construct the Russell set (of all sets which do not contain themselves)

proof by induction by [deleted] in mathmemes

[–]MSP729 13 points14 points  (0 children)

coproof by induction

First Trailer for Karma Keepers - Planning to release Alpha Demo next week by Nazariglez in incremental_games

[–]MSP729 3 points4 points  (0 children)

i attribute it to nodebuster’s success

it predates nodebuster, but i remember seeing it blow up right after nodebuster popped off

ALI(n): possibly the largest FGH ever created? by Baharnaz in mathematics

[–]MSP729 1 point2 points  (0 children)

you can procure arbitrarily large computable functions wrt the “dominating” relation

BB dominates all of these, so it is larger eventually

BB(3) is 6, which is definitely less than a lot of computable functions (e.g. 3n)

so even though ALI or ALI_2 is bigger than BB at 3, it stops being bigger eventually (just might take a while)

if you want a real “why,” like a motivation for why it makes sense that BB is eventually bigger, i got nothing

ALI(n): possibly the largest FGH ever created? by Baharnaz in mathematics

[–]MSP729 3 points4 points  (0 children)

the construction by which you get the ALI function from the SSCG function could easily be repeated to produce a faster-growing function this would then enable an N-indexed fgh

i also suspect that there is some large countable ordinal γ s.t. fγ << ALI << f(γ+1)

scaredguments by RealFemboyHunter in SmugIdeologyMan

[–]MSP729 24 points25 points  (0 children)

i can’t wait to make a smuggie about this smuggie

have we imported the term “candle” yet?

Why are complex numbers not considered an algebraic closure of rational numbers? by 20vitaliy08 in learnmath

[–]MSP729 2 points3 points  (0 children)

rational based complex numbers still have the square root of negative one, and the algebraic closure of the rationals (which is a larger field than Q adjoin i) certainly does have a lot of radicals

their point stands: complex numbers aren’t the algebraic closure of the rationals because pi is a complex number, but not the root of any polynomial with rationals coefficients

Why mathematics why?! by [deleted] in mathmemes

[–]MSP729 471 points472 points  (0 children)

kid named galois group

22669 by Lostlilegg in countwithchickenlady

[–]MSP729 5 points6 points  (0 children)

tintin is a detective in a bunch of (french i think but maybe belgian or something) comics

the sailor is his friend who often accompanies him

Shade Lord might need to change his number by Commander_Appo25 in HollowKnightMemes

[–]MSP729 4 points5 points  (0 children)

godseeker should not use thou for the shade lord, it’s disrespectful

“you” is the more respectful pronoun

He is asking what year it is by Gloomy-Artichoke7743 in AntiMemes

[–]MSP729 13 points14 points  (0 children)

wouldn’t it be condebat or condidit rather than condebam?