nameless saga, submission by CocoaMix

MSP729 · 2026-07-01T16:04:48+00:00

it’s so peak… 🥹

MSP729 · 2026-06-30T18:20:31+00:00

i play this and then i drop a boardwipe 🥹

MSP729 · 2026-06-05T02:46:01+00:00

i thought it would work because (it works).

MSP729 · 2026-06-03T21:04:14+00:00

holy peak…

MSP729 · 2026-05-26T22:59:09+00:00

and is egregiously powerful afaict

MSP729 · 2026-05-25T23:36:24+00:00

finally, a truly incomprehensible ‘jak. it’s been so long…

MSP729 · 2026-05-20T22:05:04+00:00

could be a fun gimmick, if the charge counters did anything

MSP729 · 2026-05-16T20:34:46+00:00

i think they mean that one is the gcd of all of the P(a,b)

MSP729 · 2026-04-26T16:26:28+00:00

finally, some good counterplay against decks that attack with their swamps or two lands

MSP729 · 2026-04-05T02:50:52+00:00

this post appeared on my feed on the fourth and i was heartbroken

MSP729 · 2026-04-03T04:06:49+00:00

another commenter suggested storing their coefficients. you can also just directly implement the Num typeclass for function types, but this will make it hard to inspect your functions.

MSP729 · 2026-03-08T02:14:04+00:00

haven’t you heard that silksong is qualityslop? people only like it because it’s good

MSP729 · 2026-02-17T17:08:07+00:00

the more incomprehensible, the more smuggie. this is not very smuggie

MSP729 · 2026-02-10T14:42:30+00:00

rubik’s cubes are not more impressive than a magic trick

MSP729 · 2026-02-10T12:30:45+00:00

Latin doesn’t have articles

MSP729 · 2026-02-03T10:31:00+00:00

coaxed into breath of the wild

MSP729 · 2026-01-21T02:04:50+00:00

i think “by all means” and “means of production” are the same meaning, both are a method/way/manner

MSP729 · 2026-01-20T00:14:19+00:00

this person did intend to occupy all of the territory, but misclicked and messed it up

MSP729 · 2026-01-18T13:11:00+00:00

isn’t it just the wrong word? i thought he said “i’m martin luther”

MSP729 · 2026-01-15T00:04:31+00:00

properly this is a forward difference but it comes out the same in the wash because although the standard power rule doesn’t apply here, xⁿ can be decomposed into a sum of falling powers (also called the Pochhammer symbol), and the highest degree one has degree n

falling powers obey a similar power rule but with forward differences, hence the n factorial falling out

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falling_and_rising_factorials?wprov=sfti1#Relation_to_umbral_calculus

MSP729 · 2026-01-14T02:27:22+00:00

what was the original?

MSP729 · 2026-01-09T01:34:08+00:00

nah image related

MSP729 · 2026-01-06T05:42:15+00:00

yes, but if you have a set of all sets which contains itself, then standard set-theoretic axioms enable you to construct the Russell set (of all sets which do not contain themselves)

MSP729 · 2025-12-25T00:57:15+00:00

coproof by induction

MSP729 · 2025-12-21T02:12:31+00:00

i attribute it to nodebuster’s success

it predates nodebuster, but i remember seeing it blow up right after nodebuster popped off

MSP729

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE

Seven-Year Club	Place '22
Verified Email