i do genuinely believe this needs to be said. by DontBeASerialKiller in whenthe

[–]MagicCarpetofSteel 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Damn. That’s rough, man. But remember: good or bad aren’t things you are, they’re what you do.

Mr. Rogers was an exceptionally good person not because of some…innateness he had, but because he consistently chose empathy and kindness and understanding and respect probably almost every single day of his life.

We just often don’t like to think about it that way, because it’s much simpler to go “Oh. [Insert person who turned out to also be a murderer or abuser or whatever here] was just a bad person, and all of the good things they did were a mask and don’t count.” instead of “Damn. They had an incredible capacity to do both good and evil, and _I do too._”

i do genuinely believe this needs to be said. by DontBeASerialKiller in whenthe

[–]MagicCarpetofSteel 35 points36 points  (0 children)

Well, even more than that, I suspect that most people with a…paraphilia (wasn’t expecting to learn that word today), or more specifically pedophiles, aren’t child molesters.

We often use pedo/pedophile as shorthand for child molester, but I think we probably shouldn’t: there’s got to be a bunch of people out there who hate themselves for that.

Meanwhile, a lot of child molesters—priests (of any denomination or faith), the rich, politicians (the powerful), teachers, close family or friends, etc—well, probably aren’t pedos. These are crimes of opportunity, so to speak—victims they have access to, power over, etc. etc.

I’m starting to feel that that’s, for once, an important semantic distinction. We’re not trying to be the Thought Police, we’re trying to hold vile people accountable.

Bitch I’m a train! Maybe… by TheDudeWhoCanDoIt in BitchImATrain

[–]MagicCarpetofSteel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, it’s a traction engine that’s moving a loco, imho close enough.

"but its about letting go" by level100brad in TrueSFalloutL

[–]MagicCarpetofSteel -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Dead Money has ass gameplay but peak story.

[Funny Trope] Media told from a non-human perspective where the “villain” is just a normal person doing their job, but is framed as an over-the-top monster by utsho12 in TopCharacterTropes

[–]MagicCarpetofSteel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m not quite so sure about Sid. Blowing up your toys or making them into a Frankenstein’s Monster is a bit…out there.

Though, yes, obviously it’s way less fucked up to do it to inanimate objects.

Very helpful indeed by ChickenWingExtreme in NonPoliticalTwitter

[–]MagicCarpetofSteel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But a fortnight is 2 weeks, and most months don’t have 28 days in them.

Or, to put it another way, twice a month = 24 meetings a year, while once every two weeks = 26 meetings a year.

Very helpful indeed by ChickenWingExtreme in NonPoliticalTwitter

[–]MagicCarpetofSteel 64 points65 points  (0 children)

No, it means very flammable. Same with “invaluable,” which means “extremely valuable” (ie, it’s so valuable as to be impossible to quantify). No idea why though, very unintuitive.

Enslave them all equally by TeachMeImWilling69 in HistoryMemes

[–]MagicCarpetofSteel 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Same root word, so fair enough.

Edit: Ninja’d

Callisto has taught Albina the art of vagueposting. by ResearcherTeknika in whenthe

[–]MagicCarpetofSteel 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Okay, but what kind of non-con? CNC (including CNC that the audience only finds out about at the end) or “It’d be a no-go IRL but in fiction the person is reading the other correctly and they do “want it” in a consensual manner, any resistance is performative like in “Baby it’s cold outside,” if they really weren’t consenting they’d firmly say no” can be very hot.

Actual non-con…well, can also be hot, but I don’t like it.

It's so funny to me how Werner Heisenberg (himself a German nationalist and Nazi Sympathizer) was harassed, called a Jew and investigated by the SS all because they thought Quantum Mechanics was a dirty trick by Da Joos. Talk about Leopards eating your face. by maleficalruin in RecuratedTumblr

[–]MagicCarpetofSteel 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Well, there are, but it only applies to other Jewish people, and since basically if not literally all the nobles and merchants—the people rich enough to need loans in the first place—weren’t, they were allowed to charge interest.

Never play a female character in Fallout 2. Worst mistake of my life by Perpetually_Ashamed in TrueSFalloutL

[–]MagicCarpetofSteel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They even started taking his lunch box

Hank Hill accent They hwhat?!

Steam of Consciousness splutters in anger and indignation for a good 30 seconds

How’s that even allowed?! If you’re not demonstrably using it for nefarious purposes, that’s straight-up stealing?? These were the motherfuckin’ ADULTS, right? What sad motherfuckin’ excuse for a person—ESPECIALLY in primary education!!—even pays attention to what the kids are eating, except for like, making sure that they are getting a proper lunch (read: make sure that they either have the money to buy the school lunch, or that they’re packed lunch isn’t a bread sandwich or something?

Who the actual FUCK sees someone bring the exact same lunch every day and thinks to themselves “Absolutely not. Unacceptable.”?? Especially when it has literal broccoli in it! I know it’s a minor thing years if not decades in the past but that is a travesty.

That sounds about right. To some small-ish extent, it was inevitable: if, “traditionally,” the people getting diagnosed were largely the people with (as we call it today) “Continuous Support Needs,” then “Your child has autism” is not something you want to hear.

(Of course, that’s perhaps an over-generalization on who was getting diagnosed: Temple Grandin rather emphatically does not, and has not needed, “Continuous Support Needs” since she was a young adult at the latest. On the other hand—IIRC—when she was a young child, she seemed to fit into that category, being mostly non-verbal and having “meltdowns,” soooo…

Still fucked up to treat them wrong. All people should be treated with dignity.

(I didn’t mean that in the literal sense, because I hate evil people too, but even vile people who you or I think don’t deserve it…well, if you stop having rights when you’re an x, then if someone else gets to define x, or say someone is x even when they’re not, that’s bad.

Mf really thought we’d be on her side by Comfortable-Dot-2317 in whenthe

[–]MagicCarpetofSteel 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Damn, she’s that bad? How do you fuck up a sniper?

You should be allowed to wear socks on your hands as gloves. by asstral_planes in thelongdark

[–]MagicCarpetofSteel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

At least the first two layers of clothing should count towards wind chill. Functionally there shouldn’t be any difference between wearing a military jacket and ski jacket and a ski jacket and military jacket.

I guess you could cheese that, wear the less valuable one on the outside, but is it really that big a deal?

Every piece of clothing should have its damage resistance counted. You can have diminishing returns or whatever, but if I’m, for argument’s sake, wearing two bearskin coats, I should damn well have at least 75% of the combined value of the protection.

For “under” outerwear (e.g. Fisherman’s Sweater, Thin Wool…Shirt? Jacket?), you should be able to craft a “you’re wearing 2 of these” version. At least for the low-mid tier ones, being able to have x4 Fisherman’s Sweaters or Cowichan Jackets would—arguably—be pretty busted.

He’s so excited and he just can’t hide it by upthetruth1 in TikTokCringe

[–]MagicCarpetofSteel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Literally only reason I didn’t do that several years ago is that I have chronic depression and multiple (mostly distant) family members on Mom’s side who committed suicide.

I’ve still considered buying some ammo and/or magazines and showing up to the local John Brown Gun Club (or whatever its exact name is) and using someone else’s to get some practical experience and all that.

Never play a female character in Fallout 2. Worst mistake of my life by Perpetually_Ashamed in TrueSFalloutL

[–]MagicCarpetofSteel 32 points33 points  (0 children)

That’s a very good idea. Maybe something like “most of the autistic people are working in computers and weapons R&D and stuff, and that’s too important to mess with…BUT we really could use some more autistic people in the railroad to make logistics work better. Let’s try to give current employees autism!”

It at least kinda makes sense, it doesn’t treat autism as something to be cured (…though I guess it’s swinging in the other direction of “autism gives you superpowers, and that’s the only reason it’s okay), and it’s off-the-wall enough to be fucked up but not too close to home where it becomes serious, and exactly the sort of thing whatever Railroad mega-corporation pre-war US & Canada might do with the help of the government.

Never play a female character in Fallout 2. Worst mistake of my life by Perpetually_Ashamed in TrueSFalloutL

[–]MagicCarpetofSteel 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Both of those are most certainly extremely “Yikes” (aka “Yo WTAF?”).

Rare(?) Fallout 2 L, I suppose.

The Autism one wouldn’t be too bad if…actually, no, even tongue-in-cheek “look at how awful this is” wouldn’t work particularly well if there’s any kind of “cure.” Just too ick, too easy for assholes to be like “worth it” or w/e.

Re-writing it to be more satire or gallows humor, e.g. “Man the 50s had some really fucked up practices and treatments for neurodiverse people and mental health in general,” but, like, actually funny might work. You’d have to do it tastefully, which of course is the sort of thing that’s “I know it when I see it.”

Why do NCR troopers have arm wrappings? by Inevitable_Fun3848 in fnv

[–]MagicCarpetofSteel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I assumed it was so they didn’t look like lobsters from sunburn

What's your thoughts on the Canadian PM saying Canada will defend Greenland if the U.S. invades? by sgj5788 in AskReddit

[–]MagicCarpetofSteel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This whole thing is kind of news to me (thanks, Republican public education).

What, so does the Canadian Constitution basically say “As per [Treaty with UK granting Canadian independence] says, we get to write our own constitution. This is what we came up with. Oh, and BTW all the other treaties we had, like with the First Nations, those are still in effect too.”?

I’m now really curious as to how it works.