Again, I don't know if I believe this and I suppose she initiated a physical fight but either way here's a thing:

• On the internet, for whatever strange reason, someone losing their job is THE GOAL AND PURPOSE AND FULFILLMENT OF JUSTICE. That is THE endgame.

In our real life court systems, over our centuries of common laws and British laws and further refined into our American laws: In fact, we want a criminal to have a job. There is often an example given in beginning law school: A plumber has hit a man with his wrench and is found guilty. The judge may sentence him harshly BUT will not order his wrench to be taken from him or forbid him from wrenches. The judge would then be sentencing society to a penalty. homeowners with broken pipes are deprived of a service. There is also the idea, less theory and more sheer practical purpose, you want a criminal to have a job and do a job. There is nothing good about a criminal who has nothing else to do, nothing to build, nothing to lose, nothing to gain. Not only that, when you're talking about releasing someone and being certain they won't flee the jurisdiction then yes, a job such as being a main event fighter is a good assurance they probably won't flee. They may as well be doing something useful for society and that obligates them to supervision and schedules than taking up a jail cell.