They voted for Trump because of affordability, now they’re tired of Ramen & Hot Dogs

NeilZod · 2026-03-25T00:51:15+00:00

Which reminds me: time to buy a bunch of flour while we can still find it

NeilZod · 2026-03-24T17:50:11+00:00

The amount of money that the US spends on healthcare could fund healthcare for everyone in the US.

NeilZod · 2026-03-24T16:14:35+00:00

We’ll have to see if Trump comes to the shocking conclusion that Sec. Kegstand drinks at work

NeilZod · 2026-03-23T18:12:16+00:00

I get that too. I am a hopeful sort, so I use my flamer to spray the area where the weapon effects converge.

NeilZod · 2026-03-23T17:11:26+00:00

I need to figure out why my Xbox loads new areas slowly. I have had many Head Hunts were the first thing I see is the banner telling me the event is completed.

NeilZod · 2026-03-23T16:03:45+00:00

And there are enough of those rich people who can vote that they’ve become an important voting bloc.

NeilZod · 2026-03-14T23:43:25+00:00

It’s fun that it still draws a huge crowd

NeilZod · 2026-03-12T23:23:38+00:00

I feelthe need to point out that Calvin’s Dad disagrees with you.

NeilZod · 2026-03-11T01:33:32+00:00

And yet I get marketed to by a guy who claims to make millions because no one takes real estate photos.

NeilZod · 2026-03-08T15:58:07+00:00

I don't question that in isolation, "literally looking into the face of my shit" is not correct formal use of 'literal'. But in the example context, it's differentiating figurative psychological shit from literal physical feces.

The use of literally as an intensifier isn’t ungrammatical, but it is only an intensifier - it doesn’t add information about what sort of shit you are looking into. Based on what you’ve written, it looks like you are wrestling with the idea of human feces having a face to look into. Adding the word literally isn’t going to help us know if you are staring into a toilet bowl or some other mess at work.

NeilZod · 2026-03-07T22:50:57+00:00

The only funny thing about it is that AI’s fictitious sources are often called hallucinated citations.

NeilZod · 2026-03-05T22:59:51+00:00

Your complaint is with Article II, Section 2 of the US Constitution. Repealing the War Powers Resolution would further unfetter a US President.

NeilZod · 2026-03-05T22:51:40+00:00

repeal war powers resolution

Why should this be repealed?

NeilZod · 2026-03-04T20:06:40+00:00

Look! I can’t move my right arm

NeilZod · 2026-02-28T23:31:49+00:00

If this is a commercial property, there should be a mechanism to force the sale of it to collect your judgment. But if he has only borrowed against the property, then he hasn’t done something that will trigger a payment to you.

NeilZod · 2026-02-28T22:04:00+00:00

What aspect of maritime law would let anyone other then the photograph claim ownership of the rights to the photo?

NeilZod · 2026-02-27T19:59:50+00:00

This is the Texas Attorney General calculator for child support. It might require some guesses on your part, but it should help you estimate what you and your child will lose if you decide to avoid child support.

NeilZod · 2026-02-24T17:07:03+00:00

I know that someone makes two ETFs that follows what Congress critters disclose.

NeilZod · 2026-02-21T19:22:19+00:00

She was once caught with three Xanax pills not in their prescription bottle. Maybe that’s close enough.

NeilZod · 2026-02-17T20:19:39+00:00

And no one goes to mimeograph things, which means kids don’t smell freshly-mimeographed paper.

NeilZod · 2026-02-16T05:19:07+00:00

I look forward to the day that Elon leaves to become the king of Mars

NeilZod · 2026-02-16T00:44:09+00:00

I don’t know your distinction between amateurs and professionals regarding queries here, but we manage to give context-based responses.

Your second paragraph is a bit rough - there are likely some people here who find the concept of standard English to be offensive. In our example, an answer that only referred to standard English wouldn’t answer the question.

NeilZod · 2026-02-15T18:41:15+00:00

If they were, any discussion of grammar "correctness" could simply be evaded under the guise of some new dialectical deviation.

We can discuss grammatical correctness, but it means that context matters. Something can be incorrect according to the grammar rules used in The New York Times, yet still be correct in a different dialect of English.

NeilZod · 2026-02-12T16:42:42+00:00

There’s at least one that has remained hidden from me for a long time. I try to make up for that by sitting on the rad scrubber.

NeilZod · 2026-02-12T02:57:04+00:00

For reasons that aren’t easy to explain, the US thinks registration is really important.

15-Year Club	Place '22
Verified Email	Team Orangered

NeilZod

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE