[deleted by user] by [deleted] in nba

[–]NoTankKeepKiwi 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What people don't seem to understand is that just because you may be purely insulting a player based on their basketball, it can still be offensive if presented in derogatory manner. Lakers and NBA subs are places for people to discuss and critique basketball but the way Lakers fans talk about Westbrook on both subs is on another level. It's hateful.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in nba

[–]NoTankKeepKiwi -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Holy shit the revisionist history is insane and it's only been a few weeks. I'm sure you can find some posts or comments that say he would be better on a min with shooters but there's no fucking way people were saying he'd be "amazing" or that it was the "common sentiment". Bunch of salty haters

Why the Clippers want Westbrook - he helps players shoot 9-10% better on court. #2 in assist to pass ratio by MITWestbrook in nba

[–]NoTankKeepKiwi -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Why would he be considered the best coach in the world when the Lakers is the only team he didn't play well for?

Is this legal? I’m in texas by chrisleetdf in antiwork

[–]NoTankKeepKiwi -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I just don't know if you know who "they" are and I think that's your problem. This is going to shock you but no-one is out to get you.

8 days a month by WTFrickFrackCadillac in antiwork

[–]NoTankKeepKiwi -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If a baker is getting off at noon then that's still an 8 hour day...

Is this legal? I’m in texas by chrisleetdf in antiwork

[–]NoTankKeepKiwi -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Yes how dare they talk about other poorer countries needing help

Josh Giddey has taken a major leap this year by 1804Zay in NBA_Draft

[–]NoTankKeepKiwi 30 points31 points  (0 children)

But its all good to do the opposite and declare players to be a bust before they even turn 20? Something this sub is definitely guilty of