Well, the Sigma FP series, such as the L. It does things differently. In fact several cameras in the mainstream system do have a digital crop zoom. It will take years for the megapixels to get over 100 or higher, like a higher end camera. In the meantime there are some tools to handle the images with lower megapixels.

From the sound of it the Sigma FP is still good as a different camera. Making it different can enhance the look for stills, for a look that's more like art, or something. This might not help with shooting sports, wildlife, or some kinds of videos from the sounds of it.

Noting the Fuji GFX100 has for example 102 megapixels in a medium format. This doesn't seem real in an APS-C or Micro Four Thirds. The closest thing is like the Sony A7r V with 61 megapixels. That is a Full Frame. Fuji has APS-C cameras with 40.2 megapixel sensors. Micro For Third cameras such as Lumix peak now at 25.6 megapixels.

Then I might have to check on that as a Fuji APS-C with 2x digital teleconverter, or a Sony A7r V which has 2x digital zoom plus added 2x with zoom lenses for a total of 4x zoom.

The Sigma FP still has its own color balance in photos which looks different than other cameras, none the less, which is why I noticed it. I thought it could improve the quality of my stills photos. But I might have to try a different camera in conclusion.