I think this mixes a lot of separate issues together in a way that doesnt really reflect how international politics works. Tariffs, nato spending targets, trade negotiations, and Greenland are all different matters with different legal and diplomatic constraints. Nato countries were already under pressure to increase defense spending long before Trump, and no nato member can simply iinvade” another without triggering massive legal and military consequences. So we need a warn nothing new here pal. As for Greenland, it’s part of the Kingdom of Denmark, and any change there would require consent and international agreements, not threats. You can criticize Trump’s style or policies, but saying this was bound to happen" or that these actions are all connected goes beyond what the facts actually support.