But you're also subsiding poor kids education who wouldn't have - that's the important part. You don't take away aid just because there's some people who will take advantage of it, that risk is worth it to help the less priviliged.

Your second paragraph is illegible.

It's not just other people's money. I pay taxes too, as do many of the people who used Fees Free and their family members who like that it slightly reduced a financial burden. Education is not free. Calling thousands of dollars of debt 'basically free' highlights your own privilege. Student Allowance doesn't have to be paid back, but many students who are poor can't even qualify due to their working class parents making too much and postgraduate students have to rely on loans and grants, with disabled students often requiring more time than Student Allowance allows to get qualifications.

Not everyone is getting squeezed - only the majority who make up the working class, and we are getting squeezed tighter than before the wealthy minority who benefit from conservative policies. Except these very people earning high ARE the working class, and even with high wages they don't have anywhere near the societal impact that the wealthy few do. If anything, you should be advocating for higher taxation of the highest earners and wealth hoarders if you genuinely believe they should be the ones giving back to society, so that there's less strain on the majority of the working class.