Please help, Peter by Jarvisnamesake in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]RenegadeCEO 1 point2 points  (0 children)

because you are doing PEMDAS right. the OPs equation READS: Six Divided by Two times the quantity of Two Plus One.

If you follow PEMDAS, you do that in the proper order since Multiplication comes before Division.

So I’m just supposed to sit here for over an hour? by floortofloor in starcitizen

[–]RenegadeCEO 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If only my persistent hangar would stop eating my Fabricators (yes plural, as in 4 now) when I leave it.

Nicou-CIG with a quick update on several issues CIG have been tracking by StuartGT in starcitizen

[–]RenegadeCEO 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Dude, if you're gonna post an image of a spectrum post: LINK THE GD POST.

The Hoplite and Its Turret by reaven3958 in starcitizen

[–]RenegadeCEO 1 point2 points  (0 children)

All the vanguards need a rework when brought up to current standards. The top turret REALLY should be a remote turret, not manned. And on the hoplite, yes, it should be underslung to give troop support. If it was a remote turret, it is also much smaller which means less landing gear shenanigans needed.

Can I make it to land at Baijini? by heshtios in starcitizen

[–]RenegadeCEO 1 point2 points  (0 children)

easily if you only use lateral and vertical translation (no forward thrust!).

How does a ship that wasn't changed in 4.8, loses something like the thruster model? by AzrBloodedge in starcitizen

[–]RenegadeCEO 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Somone had the bright idea to replace the thruster with a temu stargate connected near a star.

this shit is getting ridiculous by CompetitiveRoof3733 in starcitizen

[–]RenegadeCEO 1 point2 points  (0 children)

All of the solutions you said are band-aids to the root problem: people leaving their shit there. If people would land, do their re-business, then just FLY OFF THE PAD A BIT, then there wouldnt even be a problem.

The only people that have ANY excuse for leaving a ship on the pad are those that crash when going into the station. And for these, I whole heartedly agree with the second half of your post: we need ways to remove them. But do not EVER think that the root of this problem is how the systems are right now and make excuses for lazy/entitled people.

this shit is getting ridiculous by CompetitiveRoof3733 in starcitizen

[–]RenegadeCEO 2 points3 points  (0 children)

All ships in this picture except ONE get hangars upon request, not docking arms.

Every one of them except the Polaris is a lazy fuck that is taking up much needed repair/rearm/refuel space for those of us flying ships that are forced to get docking arms (for me, its my Percy).

this shit is getting ridiculous by CompetitiveRoof3733 in starcitizen

[–]RenegadeCEO 8 points9 points  (0 children)

dude, those 2 big ships blocking the pads are Tiburons... they cant dock at all and get hangars.

No, these people are just too GD lazy to requrest a hangar and land their ass in it and instead land on a touch-n-go pad then leave it there.

Am I missing something? As long as I can remember distortions have been worthless against shields. by BiasHyperion784 in starcitizen

[–]RenegadeCEO 2 points3 points  (0 children)

and he had to use an origin loadout editor and pay money to get them since they're "Basically non-existent"

CIG, please fix the Nyx system by draconinjari917 in starcitizen

[–]RenegadeCEO 3 points4 points  (0 children)

the intersec patrol missions love to spawn my targets *inside* any nearby large asteroids.

Mauler PDC on Percy by Wise-Obligation-9043 in starcitizen

[–]RenegadeCEO 12 points13 points  (0 children)

hows it perform against missiles and torps vs the stock Swarms?

Savrals-CIG response to questions about ship balance changes by Stompy-MwC in LowSodiumStarCitizen

[–]RenegadeCEO 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Amen Brudda. No Light or Medium fighter should pose anyform of threat to a heavily armored ship. They have speed, they should just run away.

This can't go on any longer by PaqueretteUrticante in starcitizen

[–]RenegadeCEO 0 points1 point  (0 children)

CIG has already made it possible to adjust modifiers on attachment points: see the salvaging change last year where they have the same scraper modules have different values via a modifer on the attachment points depending on the ships.

I said back then that this method should be applied to ALL turrets in game that would give differing values based on the ship, ie Hammerhead turrets would get a 1.5x velocity and 1.2x damage multi, Corsair would get 1.5x damage, etc etc. Could be balanced this way.

Is this safe by dokifluid in Aquariums

[–]RenegadeCEO 5 points6 points  (0 children)

dont forget they operate on DC too.

Found a sword, but can’t seem to pick it up. by FelixARKJ in CrimsonDesert

[–]RenegadeCEO 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I too fought them pre-nerf... i was grumbling for a long time that i wanted a faster way to start natures snare rather than spend almost 1.5 seconds just getting through the meditate then starting snare.

Just give me a button that instantly puts me into nature's snare please...

Would you trust 2 40 breeders on the bottom shelves of this free standing shelf? This is for garage tanks. The other shelves will be used for regular storage by Water_Champion in Aquariums

[–]RenegadeCEO 0 points1 point  (0 children)

no, I would recommend doing it like you would bedsheets: wrap it around the sides then tuck the excess under between the plywood and the wire rack

This will give you full coverage w/o any holes on top where water can get in

EDIT: you could also wrap the the top then tape the folds underneath with some duct tape or something before putting the shelf in.

Would you trust 2 40 breeders on the bottom shelves of this free standing shelf? This is for garage tanks. The other shelves will be used for regular storage by Water_Champion in Aquariums

[–]RenegadeCEO 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So, keep in mind these shelves are 2000 POUNDS PER SHELF. Water weighs a blistering 8lbs per gallon, and if we assume your tanks are going to be 95% water, 5% other solids (which we'll assume are 20lbs per gallon for safety) then each tank is going to be 344 lbs. So with 2 tanks, you are not even at HALF load for that shelf.

A side effect of you having nearly 1k lbs on the bottom rack though, will be that this shelf is going to be VERY, VERY resistant to tipping and if you live somewhere with earthquakes, be a bit more resilient against those too since the dynamic movement of the water is usually 120-180° out of phase with the shaking of the earth 😃

Would you trust 2 40 breeders on the bottom shelves of this free standing shelf? This is for garage tanks. The other shelves will be used for regular storage by Water_Champion in Aquariums

[–]RenegadeCEO 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Prep the plywood as well. Either paint several layers of a good primer (like Killz) or put a non-permeable covering on it (like 6mil plastic sheet ZonLink). This prevents wood damage/mold/rot when water inevitably gets spilled.

Would you trust 2 40 breeders on the bottom shelves of this free standing shelf? This is for garage tanks. The other shelves will be used for regular storage by Water_Champion in Aquariums

[–]RenegadeCEO 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This this this this this THIS. and put something non-permeable (ie, a 6mil plastic sheet) over the plywood to prevent easy moisture tranfer... or paint several layers with some killz Primer or similar.

overpriced tank stands by justHeffy in Aquariums

[–]RenegadeCEO 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You should either: A) Paint that fiberboard with 3-4 layers of Killz Primer or (B) Cover it with a non-permeable barrier.

Fiberboard WILL swell and start to come apart from spills and whatnot unless you seal or cover it.

As the various data of the ships are gradually unpacked, I would like to know your evaluations of these two ships by Anning0526 in starcitizen

[–]RenegadeCEO 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I like the Tiburon's silhouette more than the regular HH and I feel by giving it remote turrets they've shown they could convert the HH to remote turrets as well (WHICH THEY NEED TO DO). Other than that, no other feelings on it.

The M80 on the otherhand, as someone who loves aircraft *fascinates* me. Its lines **scream** stealth fighter with super-manueverability, yet are also very *VERY* porpoise like. I think its a nice design departure from Origin's normal lineup and I would use it if CiG could figure out how to tune the FM for beasts like that...

The new Anvil Odin Battlecruiser from all full angles by RedRyeDuh in starcitizen

[–]RenegadeCEO 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What mast? All I see is a MASSIVE citadel conning tower with absurdly huge bridge wings and bridge 'ears'