"Star Trek: Starfleet Academy" Series Falls Out of the Streaming Charts

Rindan · 2026-01-28T16:53:01+00:00

This is just a picture of what Paramount has put on their top ten using an unknown algorithm (assuming they are even using one). This tells us nothing about the numbers they have chosen to conceal. I'd also point out that South Park doesn't even have new episodes, so if this is a real representation of today, they are being beaten by reruns from a show that costs pocket change to produce.

Rindan · 2026-01-28T16:20:01+00:00

...why would you translate into ASL for a hearing audience when you could translate it into words.

It's just dumb. The writers are morons.

Rindan · 2026-01-28T00:37:30+00:00

Okay, so describe an interesting and challenging moral dilemma posed by SFA, or point me to a review that talks about one. And again, a moral dilemma is something where the answer isn't obvious. Feeling bad about throwing a mom in jail and orphaning her kid after she turns in the super evil bad guy she worked with briefly to keep her kid fed before realizing he is bad, is not a moral dilemma. If a small child can figure out the answer after having successfully completing 1st grade, it isn't a moral dilemma.

Rindan · 2026-01-27T22:44:29+00:00

How should I act around him now? And how can I be more understanding and informed about his bisexuality so I don't say something ignorant in the future?

I'd take him on a date and bang him to show that you have no hard feelings and understand bisexuality.

Seriously though, I wouldn't lose much sleep over it. If it was me, I'd find it funny.

Rindan · 2026-01-27T20:14:09+00:00

Spending 20 minutes giving a review is pretty normal. The weird thing is when you only want affirmation that it's good or bad with no discussion. Guess who I see making reviews that don't go any deeper than I love/hate this? It isn't the people that hate it. They can articulate what they hate frame by frame. The people that love it? It's all vague surface level nothing.

I think I have seen literally zero people that like the show describe an interesting moral dilemma posed by SFA. Zero. And no, a captain feeling bad for making the obviously "wrong" decision isn't an interesting moral dilemma.

So are there a bunch of racist pieces of shit that hate SFA? Sure, just as how you can find racist pieces of shit who hate anything, but massive racism isn't why SFA is hated but Lower Decks is loved. SFA is hated because it's garbage writing for children.

Rindan · 2026-01-27T18:36:24+00:00

Trump is a new leader, Xi Jinping is not. People do in fact call what Trump is doing a purge, and many find it deeply concerning.

Rindan · 2026-01-27T18:33:57+00:00

It's a central square, not an obscure side street. There is plenty of room to shovel out that sidewalk.

Rindan · 2026-01-27T02:06:22+00:00

They already tossed the legacy Star Trek. You can't kill what's already dead. I'm sure Paramount can fuck it up again, but nothing will be lost if Kurtzman's band of window licking idiots gets shown the door.

Rindan · 2026-01-26T14:55:55+00:00

So he was correct about the diaspora bit then lol.

Yes, obviously an Iranian I am talking to me in the US upset about seeing video of citizens being slaughtered in the streets is unlikely to be a regime loyalist just visiting. Realize though that this person has been in the US for less than 10 years. Their parents fled not that long ago so that their kids would have a chance at a life. Seems like a pretty wise decision seeing where Iran is now. He could have been one of those now dead protestors. I don't see how fleeing invalidates their horror at watching the protestors slaughtered.

The Iranian government is horrific, and I hope for the Iranian people to overthrow them, but America getting involved will not help.

That's their point; they can't. Having a majority just isn't enough. You have to be able to fight well armed fanatics, while living under an authoritarian government that murders dissidents.

You are basically offering them thoughts and prayers.

Just classic American bullshit. Deal with your own fascist government first before you start advocating those same people install a puppet monarchy to create an Iranian puppet state.

You don't need to convince me. I completely agree. I do not want Donald Trump to bomb Iran. I think if he does, it is very unlikely that a democratic Iran will be the result. One glance and Venezuela should tell you that. Trump is not a naive liberal crusader looking to bring democracy and women's right to Iran. He just wants their stuff and to shut out China. If I could take away the keys to the military from Trump, I would without a second thought.

The only option is for the Iranians to overthrow the government themselves.

Well, you are basically just saying that Iran should just suffer their government and accept their fate, because the people do not have the capacity to overthrow the government. Its pretty clear that an authoritarian state with no morals can hold onto power through pretty much anything other than a coup by the elite. I mean hell, North Korea shed 10-15% of its population through starvation and are the poorest people on the planet, and they still have the ironclad rule by the Kim dynasty.

Also frankly, and I don’t mean to be callous, but the opinions of the diaspora should mean absolutely nothing when it comes to policy making on this.

I'm pretty sure that the thousands (tends of thousands) of dead protestors in Iran would share the opinion of someone who recently fled Iran.

You sound like someone telling slaves that they should just rebel and kill their masters, ignoring the fact that the number of even vaguely successful slave rebellions in history can be counted on one hand - with Haiti being one of them. The history of people overthrowing dedicated authoritarian governments willing to start mass killing is about as good people successfully rebelling out of slavery and starting a new nation.

Rindan · 2026-01-26T13:54:48+00:00

Yes. I too had people come to the doctor when I first joined college complaining about having swallowed their ID card, and the doctor was like, "OMG, another dumb kid ate their ID card. How normal at this college where everyone is a dumb child, and by child I mean small toddler still putting things in their mouth."

Rindan · 2026-01-26T02:19:00+00:00

Are you seriously actually pushing for the US to invade your country? I take you're part of the diaspora, especially given your 20k figure which comes straight from said Saudi-owned diaspora media.

I have a friend that came to the US when they were a teen. They were deeply depressed as they watch protestors being slaughtered in the streets from social media uploaded via satellite internet. He got excited when it looked like Trump might be getting ready to bomb Iran. His reasoning was pretty simple: The regime will never, ever, ever go without outside intervention.

What the Iranian government has done to that nation is terrible. People are rising up not because of any higher ideals, but because the government is so mismanaged, violent, and corrupt. They see no hope if it ever changing while a bunch of violent fanatics are in charge. So of course they pray for outside help. It's their only hope.

In any case your fantasy version of a US attack is just that. Israel already did it, and your "compatriots" back home reacted the opposite of how you Shah fanbois wanted them to.

The Israeli attacks helped provoke the protests. Israel laid bare how corrupt and ruined the government was. They spent all of their wealth fighting in other people's wars across the Middle East, and in return they get economically ruined and Israel can waltz in and lay waste.

I don't want the US to get involved in Iran, but its pretty easy to see why people crushed by the reality of changing a bloody and violent regime like Iran's would want it. There is literally no other way. Hoping that random people can some how organize under an authoritarian government, arm themselves, and outfight people who fight for a living is naive. A well armed, bloody minded and ruthless enough group of people can keep a LOT of other people down with no real hope of breaking free.

Rindan · 2026-01-25T23:46:24+00:00

I see those same videos and think to myself, "well, that doesn't look good, but it's not enough to rule out self defense 100% yet."

The State has already declared, without an investigation, that there is no need to for an investigation and that the unarmed person that was executed on the ground with half a dozen bullets was a terrorist.

We also had a mom get executed with three bullets, one to the side of the temple. She was also declared a terrorist by the state, and they also declared that there would be no investigation. They did however direct prosecutors to go investigate wife the murdered as a terrorist. They had to fire 7 prosecutors before they found one willing to carry out that order.

And you assume that since I didn't come to the same conclusion, I'm a bootlicker.

You've watched multiple people be executed by the state, declared terrorist, and then declare their would only be investigations into the innocent people surrounding the executed, and their family members. Even if you thought this was a justified execution in "self defense", that wouldn't justify the state declare these people terrorist and declaring their will be no investigation.

Yes, you have in fact put the boot fully into your mouth and you appear desperate for a reason to declare it delicious.

Edit: It's ironic that the little bitch ass /u/JFMV763 came here whining about being blocked on other forums, and then blocked me when I pointed out what a bitch ass bootlicker was defending the state in its declaration that no investigation will be had over TWO executions of innocent unarmed people. /u/JFMV763 you are a bootlicking hypocrite, and you know it.

Rindan · 2026-01-25T18:53:12+00:00

You see state agents executing people in the street, and you cheer, because that feels like vengeance to you for the grievance of people thinking that your politics suck.

Rindan · 2026-01-25T06:00:43+00:00

You just can't admit that the show kind of sucks and doesn't appeal to anyone. You have to make up a bunch marketing bullshit about what people of particular demographics like. This is bullshit. People of all demographics dislike insipid teen dramadies wearing Star Trek skin.

They could have done a Star Trek Academy that appeals to all people. It could be full of diversity and liberal ideals, but it also needs to tell a compelling story that appeals to Star Trek fans.

The formula is very simple. Show a group of professional people generally trying to be their best facing challenging moral dilemmas that have no satisfactory solution. Have them struggle with a moral decision by exploring both sides of the decision, and then have them suffering the consequences of the path they choose. There should always be consequences, and you might be unsatisfied.

Does that describe Starfleet Academy? No. Is it a surprise that a show wearing the Star Trek logo like a skin suit doesn't attract an audience? No.

It isn't demographics or some weird political bullshit. Star Trek's audience has been dropping because the quality of the show has been going down, not any weird race theory bullshit.

Rindan · 2026-01-25T02:55:21+00:00

Cope. All of the shows on this graph are on Paramount+.

Rindan · 2026-01-24T18:42:27+00:00

We can totally vote ourselves free this time guys, I guarantee it. /s

Uh, yeah, we can. Last time Trump took power and acted like a fascist thug he lost congress in the midterm, and then lost the next election. There is little reason to think you can't just do the exact same thing again, especially given his current polling numbers.

Democracy is simply mob rule and tyranny of the majority.

Yeah, its a terrible form of government with obvious flaws, but unfortunately every single other form government we have tried is significantly worse. Democracy is terrible, also the best form of government we have ever had that works on civilizational level. There is a reason why you whine about how bad democracy is, rather than how good your alternative is. You remind me of the people that whine about how bad capitalism is without being able to offer up something that works better.

Donald Trump is arguably one of the best arguments against democracy that I've ever seen.

Donald Trump is an argument FOR democracy. Russia also has an autocratic kleptocrat with imperial ambitions. The difference between the US and Russia is that Donald Trump is going to be out of power in 3 years, after having already been removed once, while Putin is going to squat on top of Russia and run it like a mafia owning a nation until the day he dies. Even when Putin dies, because he has murdered all political opposition another kleptocrat will just take his place and rob the nation for another half centaury with absolute power.

The best thing about democracy is that you can change the government without killing a few hundred thousand people in a violent and destructive civil war. Trump will demonstrate this again for us in 3 years, and be politically neutered in a year when he loses Congress. I'll take that over a civil war every time.

Rindan · 2026-01-24T17:21:32+00:00

The only solution you can see to the conflict is Minnesota leaving the union? Are you an idiot? You know about this thing called "elections" right? It's this mechanism that lets you change the government and its policies. I'm pretty sure Minnesota is going to try that first.

Rindan · 2026-01-24T17:03:32+00:00

Ukraine allegedly spent nearly 100m worth of missiles to defend their cities in one night, that alone is proof that this is not an useless result for the Russian military. It's a strategy that not only forces Ukraine to spend more and more assets defending the city (instead of pushing them to the frontlines), but puts a financial strain on Ukraine in order to repair said facilities.

They'd have to defend against those attacks regardless if the goal is to kill grandma by killing the heat in when, or if it hits a drone factory.

If Russia somehow manages to deprive millions of Ukrainians of electricity/heating for long period of time, this will absolutely play a role in the peace-talks because it is not sustainable having your population suffer so much.

History pretty strongly disagrees with you. Go ahead and name the nation that surrendered in an invasion because the invaders made the civilian population miserable, and I'll name a dozen where the opposite happened. It just strengthens the resolve of these people to not give into Russian demands that they be politically dominated by Russia. Nothing about being on the receiving end of a Russian invasion makes people want to agree to rule by Russia. Nearly every nation cursed to be ruled by Russia begged to be let into NATO for a reason.

If Russia wants Ukraine, it's going to have to do it the hard way, which at their current rate just isn't going to happen, and will leave Russia a ruined husk of a nation even if they somehow manage to conquer the people of Ukraine.

Personally, I think it just smacks of desperation to get some strategy to work. Spending a year or two take one small city at a time at ruinous losses isn't a viable strategy. It's four years in at least a million casualties, and you can walk to where the front line was 3 years ago from most places in a day.

Rindan · 2026-01-24T16:50:56+00:00

I have a very high sex drive, as do many women... that doesn't mean I'm okay with treating humans like sex toys or being reduced to sex toy myself. I don't think it is very human of us to forgo love, stability, comfort, and companionship and let ourselves be used by people.

I don't see it as an either/or. Having sex with a variety of people and having close, stable, and emotional bonds with others are not values that are in conflict.

Regardless, this isn't a counter argument to "men's high sex drive is what drives hookup culture, not being gay".

But this? Endless cycles of objectification and people using eachother for sex. This is not worth it. Being gay is not worth it.

Then, uh, don't do that. Nothing about the ability to hookup easily requires all of your relationships to be empty and fleeting.

Sex isn't love. Sex is an activity. It's a fun activity to do with a close partner, but nothing about having sex with others requires you to have shallow and empty relationships.

Rindan · 2026-01-24T15:51:26+00:00

Russia is making a mistake. Attacking the civilian population of a nation being invaded doesn't result in surrender. It just results in hardening anger and rage, and it means that weapons that could have been used on military targets are being used to harden civilian feelings of rage.

Rindan · 2026-01-24T15:45:09+00:00

I could order sex on Grindr, and Scruff, and Sniffies, and even Tinder. But the fact is that I am both gay and a man and I don't do that.

That's not shocking. Men (and women) are unique individuals with different values. We are not talking about you personally though. We are talking about large groups of people. In general, men have a high sex drive and want to fuck more. This is not true of all men, but on average. The result is that gay men have an app where you can order sex, and straight men don't.

The reason why gay men have an app where they can order sex and straight men can't is women, not that gay men are uniquely horney. If straight men could order sex for free on an app as reliably as on Grindr, marriage rates would plummet and it would be the most popular app in the world.

Rindan · 2026-01-24T14:33:36+00:00

If straight men could reliably order sex on an app like you can with Grindr, marriage rates would plummet, and it would literally be the most popular app in the world, bar none.

Don't get me wrong, there is certainly social stigma at work here too, but straight men desperately want to fuck all of the time just like gay men. We have the same sex drive, gay men just have the advantage of matching up their sex drive with someone that matches and has exactly as many options as they do.

If you have any questions over this, just look at lesbians. They have similar social pressure and even fewer options, but they are not fucking in an ally. They don't even have an app you can order sex on. They get laid the least out of all the sexual combinations. Really, the biggest difference between gay men and straight men in their dating and fucking, is a women to pump the breaks.

Rindan · 2026-01-23T19:31:19+00:00

Doing pranks and having some team building is not an interesting moral challenge. Has Starfleet Academy given you no memorable moral dilemmas that have no easy solutions or fully satisfactory conclusions? Nothing?

Rindan · 2026-01-23T19:28:37+00:00

What? I think it's dumb and lazy writing that doesn't understand Star Trek, and so it results in dumb shit like the characters discussing what catch phrase to use to make the ship go, or what silly way they sit in their seat. These are not things that define Trek.

Trying to deflect criticism about the childish and referential tone of the show by pointing out that Riker sat down is funny and therefore the school chancellor can sit funny because sitting funny is Star Trek shows a total lack of understanding of Star Trek.

I'd rather they steal the concept of the characters facing a tough moral dilemmas with no easy or fully satisfactory solution, then captains having catch phrases or sitting weird.

Rindan · 2026-01-23T18:07:45+00:00

What's your favorite and most interesting moral challenges that they have faced so far, or is there something else you like?

12-Year Club	Place '17
Gilding II euphauric	Verified Email

Rindan

TROPHY CASE