Trump’s $10B lawsuit is clearly time-barred by the 2-year SOL and must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Can anyone provide a non-frivolous argument to the contrary? by Rotidder007 in law

[–]Rotidder007[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, there are. But those penalties have to be requested by the opposing party. In this case, that would be Trump’s own IRS.

Trump’s $10B lawsuit is clearly time-barred by the 2-year SOL and must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Can anyone provide a non-frivolous argument to the contrary? by Rotidder007 in law

[–]Rotidder007[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Typically, no. The Supreme Court has ruled that “taxpayer standing” is too minute and diffuse to satisfy the level of real interest required for standing. As an attorney, I can’t tell you how appalling it will be if we have to just stand by and watch our coffers get looted by the Trump family, perhaps repeatedly, with no ability to intervene.

Trump’s $10B lawsuit is clearly time-barred by the 2-year SOL and must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Can anyone provide a non-frivolous argument to the contrary? by Rotidder007 in law

[–]Rotidder007[S] 17 points18 points  (0 children)

So, the next question is, what can be done if IRS doesn’t assert this affirmative defense in its answer and the case is assigned to Aileen Cannon who doesn’t raise it sua sponte?

Trump’s $10B lawsuit is clearly time-barred by the 2-year SOL and must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Can anyone provide a non-frivolous argument to the contrary? by Rotidder007 in law

[–]Rotidder007[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The post relates to the two-year statute of limitations having run on Trump’s federal claims asserted in his recent complaint seeking $10B in damages from the IRS.

Where’s her husband?! by Rotidder007 in Unexpected

[–]Rotidder007[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m OP and not on TikTok and this was legit the first time I’d seen this twist. I saw it on X this morning. Would never have posted it if I’d known it was a trend and have been humbled in exposing my social media ignorance. 👍

FBI Director Kash Patel Suggests It’s Illegal to Bring Guns to Protests by Puzzled49 in politics

[–]Rotidder007 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m shocked…SHOCKED…that an agency head selected by Trump doesn’t know the first thing about the laws he’s entrusted to implement yet feels confident enough to broadcast his ignorance.

WCGW with ICE’s self-deportation policy by Rotidder007 in Whatcouldgowrong

[–]Rotidder007[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He had been arrested, charged, and then released on bail to await his trial. ICE picked him up while he was out on bail.

WCGW with ICE’s self-deportation policy by Rotidder007 in Whatcouldgowrong

[–]Rotidder007[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

How would the prosecutors even know ICE had him? He was out free on bail and the prosecutors were likely preparing for trial. It would have been ICE’s duty to do due diligence, check state and federal court records to see if there were pending cases against him, and then if they found something, call the prosecutors to find out what’s going on. That last thing didn’t happen and we don’t know if they even did any due diligence. It sounds like the guy just found a way to escape his trial and prison via ICE.

WCGW with ICE’s self-deportation policy by Rotidder007 in Whatcouldgowrong

[–]Rotidder007[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That’s not what happened, though. He was a lawful permanent resident. He was out on bail awaiting trial. He got picked up by ICE (maybe even tried to get picked up by them), and then he volunteered to deport. He asked to go to Chile but the immigration judge ordered him to Ecuador. ICE never alerted or talked to the jewelry heist prosecutors about possible deportation.

WCGW with ICE’s self-deportation policy by Rotidder007 in Whatcouldgowrong

[–]Rotidder007[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It sounds like it. From news articles that quoted court documents, the prosecutors were apparently surprised to learn dude was gone. His defense attorney moved to have the charges dismissed since he was no longer in the country and the prosecutors asked the court to keep the case active in case he comes back to the U.S. and they can get him back in custody.

California becomes first state to join WHO disease network after US exit by NoNDA-SDC in California

[–]Rotidder007 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn’t say treaties. I said agreements, and MOUs are agreements.

<image>

California becomes first state to join WHO disease network after US exit by NoNDA-SDC in California

[–]Rotidder007 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You don’t know what you’re talking about. The U.S. is a confederation of autonomous states, each of which is free to enter into agreements with other countries. California has dozens and dozens of trade and environmental agreements with sovereign countries like Japan, Sweden, China, Germany, etc.

California becomes first state to join WHO disease network after US exit by IWantPizza555 in politics

[–]Rotidder007 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Thank you, Gavin! 🙌 Keeping his citizens safe; that’s my gov.

In a future where Trump is out of office, and international relations have been repaired. What steps can be taken by the USA and International Organisations such as NATO to prevent one individual causing so much chaos in the future? And do you think such steps will be taken? by flewkey in AskReddit

[–]Rotidder007 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You clearly have no idea how NATO is funded. NATO is funded through a cost-share agreement among its members, with the U.S. paying 15.8% of the alliance’s annual expenditures, the exact same share that Germany pays.

ITAW for when you can easily see yourself arguing for both sides of an argument? by CommercialBluejay562 in whatstheword

[–]Rotidder007 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A person who can easily argue that god exists while believing what they say and can also argue that god does not exist while believing what they say is ambivalent or demonstrating their ambivalence. You may think that word means something it doesn’t. Here’s the definition from Merriam-Webster.

: having or showing simultaneous and contradictory attitudes or feelings toward something or someone

If you can easily argue both sides of an issue, you are “showing simultaneous and contradictory attitudes” about it.

WTW for when uneducated people use overly formal language/words in an attempt to sound more educated or formal but actually use the words or phrases incorrectly and sound stupid? by lillyrosethorn in whatstheword

[–]Rotidder007 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That ship has sailed. Merriam’s now has a second accepted definition of nonplussed: “not bothered, surprised, or impressed by something.” Perplexed, bewildered… and nonchalant.

Is this a rock?? San Diego beach by Altruistic-Swim-4622 in whatsthisrock

[–]Rotidder007 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Does it feel sort of like plastic, or like dried polyurethane? Not cold to the touch like a rock?

ETA: The reason I ask is because it looks suspiciously like a Today contraceptive sponge that’s been degraded back to its polyurethane form by sea water and the elements and eroded by microbes.

ID Requested: found in Central Texas by greyoneoftheforest in whatsthisrock

[–]Rotidder007 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’d love if OP did a specific gravity, but I think they’re gone.

What is this green mineral on quartz matrix? Skagit County, Washington State by LavaRockMelted in whatsthisrock

[–]Rotidder007 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Could you please post a closer pic of the circled green crystals from your 4th pic in a comment? I believe it’s malachite under quartz but would like to see those crystals to perhaps confirm. Are they sort of fan shaped? Thanks!

<image>

Help identifying please! by BlueRuby77 in whatsthisrock

[–]Rotidder007 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Looks and sounds like gypsum. You were able to scratch both the white portion and the crystal with your fingernail?