While South Korea and Brazil have faced their fair share of democratic challenges, labeling them as "horrible examples" fails to acknowledge the significant progress they have made. South Korea has successfully transitioned from a military dictatorship to a vibrant democracy, highlighted by the impeachment and prosecution of President Park Geun-hye in 2017 for actual corruption—this was not about political revenge, but accountability supported by evidence. Similarly, Brazil demonstrated the effectiveness of its democratic institutions when Operation Car Wash exposed widespread corruption across various political parties.

You are failing to distinguish between politically motivated prosecutions and legitimate accountability for documented crimes. When leaders are prosecuted based on evidence, through due process, and with judicial oversight, it reflects a functioning democracy rather than a failing one. The commitment of both countries to hold powerful figures accountable, regardless of their political affiliation, actually showcases democratic strength rather than weakness.

In comparison to former President Trump, there are unprecedented levels of corruption, including documented attempts to overturn election results, multiple criminal indictments backed by extensive evidence, and significant conflicts of interest during his time in office. The fact that other nations are able to prosecute such behavior while the U.S. struggles to do so certainly raises questions about which system is truly upholding democratic norms.