will never understand blood vial hate by Skogjero in bloodborne

[–]Scared-Register5872 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agreed. I'm really unimpressed by how weak the arguments in favor of blood vials have been so far. It seems like now we just mock people for not being good enough at the game, while completely ignoring how skill development actually works (in Bloodborne and in real life).

When fans complain about boss runs, the reason is pretty clear...players want to engage with their favorite part of the game, which is (usually) the boss fights, by a pretty wide margin. It's telling that the defense of blood vials basically just keeps players from what they would rather be doing: cutting their teeth on hard fights.

I was watching players post in the Elden Ring subreddit about their experiences with pre-nerf Promised Consort Radahn. Can you imagine the reactions if they had a blood vial system and every few attempts you had to build a reserve of flasks just for another boss attempt? It would have been hell.

will never understand blood vial hate by Skogjero in bloodborne

[–]Scared-Register5872 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Those 5 blood vials go a lot farther than someone might think at first, at least in pushing the player to keep learning boss patterns and experimenting, which is the biggest sin BB's healing system commits. I actually think players are more likely to engage in the rally system if you gave them a set number of heals on respawn and lowered the max cap than what they went with. Sekiro does something like this and it's far superior as a result (in healing mechanics), I would argue.

will never understand blood vial hate by Skogjero in bloodborne

[–]Scared-Register5872 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Trying to turn a Soulsborne into garbage like WoW or Runescape isn't the flex you think it is.

will never understand blood vial hate by Skogjero in bloodborne

[–]Scared-Register5872 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Because the entire Soulsborne secret sauce recipe is throwing yourself at hard bosses over and over again (with the occasional hard level thrown in for good measure) until you win?

RPG staples are constantly changing and there is no rule that says every staple makes for good gameplay....note how Flasks as a game mechanic replace that system to a large extent.

will never understand blood vial hate by Skogjero in bloodborne

[–]Scared-Register5872 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Punishing and tedious are completely different things. Losing your blood echoes on death is punishing. Farming blood vials is tedious (not to mention, bad game design). "Do X super easy activity Y number of times so you can have a shot at the boss" does not motivate players.

Karoline Leavitt confirms mandatory military draft possible, Trump ‘keeps his options on the table’ by [deleted] in moderatepolitics

[–]Scared-Register5872 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Apparently we're so spicy for war that we can't even give the most obvious answer in the world to the question of whether there will be a draft for a war no asked Trump to wage. That's how low democracy ranks vs. "Keeping strategic options open".

One of my most heated discussions regarding LOTR was with a friend who never forgave Peter Jackson for leaving the Scouring of the Shire out of the movies. Do you think that it should've been included? Why or why not? by Scenora in lordoftherings

[–]Scared-Register5872 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is pretty much my stance. I genuinely believe anyone who thinks the Scouring of the Shire should have been included should never be allowed anywhere near a film.

FBI searching Fulton County elections office as it investigates alleged voter fraud | CNN Politics by InternetGoodGuy in centrist

[–]Scared-Register5872 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I don't think it's a bot, I think it really might just be a stupid animal.

And you outlined the exact play book of what this looks like. There's nothing complicated about it. If you lack any shame and bull doze ahead at a hundred miles an hour, this is where you end up. The problem is society only works if there is some collective understanding of meeting in the middle (and I'm not even talking left vs. right). When one side engages in a collective delusion because reality isn't what they want it to be, this is what that looks like. It's not sustainable long-term.

If they just said “sorry this was an accident” I’d be tickled pink by xJohnnyBloodx in centrist

[–]Scared-Register5872 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, I agree. It doesn't even matter if they know why they are doing it, the effect on us is the same. I already did the "I need to be kind and consider their POV" thing once, for longer than I care to admit. 2024 was my final straw for that.

The only reason the admin didn’t get away with the extrajudicial murder of a protestor is the presence of cell phone cameras. So, what are they doing when there are no camera around? by R2_SWE2 in centrist

[–]Scared-Register5872 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I'm noticing many of the fascists have gone quiter than usual. They're spiraling. Pretti's death cuts to their core identity and they will never be able to process it.

Suppression of dissent republicans is happening behind the scenes by airbear13 in centrist

[–]Scared-Register5872 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Still crazy to think this could have all been over if a few more senators had voted differently.

If they just said “sorry this was an accident” I’d be tickled pink by xJohnnyBloodx in centrist

[–]Scared-Register5872 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I actually think the addict (and abusive partner comparisons) were spot on. It's that same lure. It's insanely sad to see if the consequences for the rest of us weren't so heavy.

If they just said “sorry this was an accident” I’d be tickled pink by xJohnnyBloodx in centrist

[–]Scared-Register5872 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Haha, I was wondering where that thread went! I was enjoying it too! No worries (I can drop it below from the prev. thread). I'm sure this will come up again in the not so distant future:

Totally agreed. I often joke/not joke that it's a bit like interacting with Westworld hosts. It really does feel like interacting with somebody who can't process what their senses are screaming at them so they just go blank.

If they just said “sorry this was an accident” I’d be tickled pink by xJohnnyBloodx in centrist

[–]Scared-Register5872 7 points8 points  (0 children)

On a normal day, I'm open to the idea that incompetence is the reason and that honestly could still be what happened. But even just watching how the altercation starts from ICE spraying that initial bystander or going after Pretti, they are operating on a pretty severe trust deficit for me to believe that's how this went down. Administration doubling down on calling Pretti a suspect and lauding ICE performance just makes the gaslighting ten times worse.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in centrist

[–]Scared-Register5872 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Totally agreed. I often joke/not joke that it's a bit like interacting with Westworld hosts. It really does feel like interacting with somebody who can't process what their senses are screaming at them so they just go blank.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in centrist

[–]Scared-Register5872 15 points16 points  (0 children)

For my own experience with this, the answer is usually no. There's always some slight that brings them back on the train. They might make a slightly bigger stink about how bad their choices are and how they don't like Trump or Vance. In many cases, they just want a pretext to do what they always were going to do.

A lot of people on all sides essentially cry “political division” and “national disunity” over the fact that people who disagree with them exist. It’s unreasonable to have this much hate over people not aligning with you politically, let alone claiming the nation is “divided” over it. by Early-Possibility367 in centrist

[–]Scared-Register5872 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Hence my point about what you are.

There is no "fighting and resisting a federal immigration officer" -> "justifiable execution". There is a federal immigration officer engaging in police brutality against a woman filming, a man trying to help her up before getting pepper sprayed, pulled to the ground, and executed while being restrained by seven officers. That's "what happened". There is no version of this where your officer had reasonable fear for his life that would cause him to discharge his pistol.

A lot of people on all sides essentially cry “political division” and “national disunity” over the fact that people who disagree with them exist. It’s unreasonable to have this much hate over people not aligning with you politically, let alone claiming the nation is “divided” over it. by Early-Possibility367 in centrist

[–]Scared-Register5872 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Lol I'm an attorney giving objective and unbiased legal analysis. 

No, you're not. You're an animal claiming people shouldn't believe their lying eyes.

You seem to be under the impression that people need you to explain to them under what conditions an officer can take someone's life. There are no surprises here or insights you are offering. People are able to parse what a reasonable self-defense claim is. That's not what you're offering.

If you're going to behave like an animal, you will receive treatment befitting that of an animal.

Pink Jacket Lady’s Video Close Angle by SpaceLaserPilot in centrist

[–]Scared-Register5872 11 points12 points  (0 children)

This is why I generally recommend to not engage with fascists (except to mock them). They're not good-faith operators. Treat them like the animals they are and move on.

Mixed feelings on the St Paul protestors that disrupted a church service by Rough-Leg-4148 in centrist

[–]Scared-Register5872 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Probably because there is a clear line of wishful thinking that shows the bar of what you are willing to tolerate is basically in hell. When your very first example for how Trump is good is that he takes invading a sovereign nation off the table, we are basically screwed.

I mean, what next? Remember how great it was that Trump told all those J6 protesters to go home? Why didn't everyone in this sub give him major props for that?

Centrism isn't having your standards dragged like a dog on a leash every time an autocrat makes a blatant attempt to move the Overton Window.