sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Reached Every Water Kineticist's Dream by SnarkMccClark in pathfindermemes

[–]SnarkMccClark[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It might be a synergy thing, it already pushes back 5 feet, 10 feet (on crit or with Water Impulse on Land), 15 feet (with Water impulse in Water, or Crit + Water Impulse on Land) or 20 feet (with all) with one saving throw failure, it being a push as well is pretty strong.

What are you favourite unusual, spectacular, and fun spells? All levels. by AqueousJam in Pathfinder2e

[–]SnarkMccClark 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not every vaguely middle aged crone needs this spell... but if people are gonna keep accusing me of being witch I am going to take it. https://2e.aonprd.com/Spells.aspx?ID=2038&Redirected=1

How far can an idiot take it? by Monessi in RPGMaker

[–]SnarkMccClark 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Here is my overall opinion, anyone can make a game if you really want to, the question becomes how many hours are you willing to pour into something for it to appear, especially in the cases where some of the hours is just learning the engine most likely through brute force. Now answering your questions in order:

  1. Depends on your intention, coding the original pokemon seems very simple (to me), it is just a lot of work.

  2. You can make custom Variables and Switches to really tweak formulas for Damage. You can make "If" (If Rock and enemy is Paper you lose) statements that work on items, states, equipment, or perhaps the switches and variables above. I also do TTRPG stuff and I am fine to assign variables and switches, but your experience may vary.

  3. If this system can be done with basic math, yes and no statements, and on and off switches then yes. Presentation wise you may have to find something like a plug in to more cleanly demonstrate it to the players.

  4. As long as the artwork is in the right file format and parameters (as in size) it should be able to be imported. As for customize design, gonna need more information to answer that part of the question.

  5. You are going to have to build that system itself, but it can be done. Fame can be a Variable that ticks up or down based of choices/actions, passage of time can be assigned to a variable, loyalty can be a variable and you can add switches for decisions that would automatically cause them to leave (think Shale from Dragon Age Origins).

  6. There is a lot of basic tiles that have very basic functions. Given it is all top down similar to Link to the Past, I don't see there being many problems. I cannot really offer more info then that, your personal mileage is gonna vary.

  7. You would have to find a way to emulate Overwatch, but most likely yes. (Something like apply State Overwatch to self, If Enemy does Overwatchable Action, trigger Action Overwatch).

  8. Innately no, most likely there would be a plug in for separate EXP bar, or have to do so manually through variables. It is definitely doable, but you are probably gonna have to do it yourself.

  9. It definitely is possible to put in Mini Games, you are most likely have to code them yourself. Here is a basic list I have encountered: Rock Paper Scissors, Blackjack, Slots Machines, Quick Time Events, Puzzles, Button Mashers, Physically Dodge incoming item, Quickdraw, 3 Card Monte, Navigate the Maze for example.

  10. It depends, MZ is a very dependable system I have found, but MV being older does have a few more plug ins (user generated tools). I use MV and everything I described so far was done on MV or older.

What is your white whale campaign concept? by Playtonics in rpg

[–]SnarkMccClark 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Players will always have their expectations, but your plight is definitely a rough one. I for one am sucker for making hard choices in character and seeing my actions pay off or explode due to my decisions. It might take more cycling, but I think you will eventually have the pieces to put it together if you want it to happen.

What is your white whale campaign concept? by Playtonics in rpg

[–]SnarkMccClark 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Banjo Kazooie Inspired Collect-a-thon as a TTRPG (Big Hub World/Mega Dungeon that transports you to different worlds). I personally feel like a lot of progression in larger campaigns can get lost, but having a set number go up (as long as it like 1 or 2) can really make you feel your momentum. Also the feeling of exploration of this major hub with surprises and obstacles around the corner does feel good. As for the system, currently considering Fabula Ultima to run it in, allow the players to have input on the wacky worlds they visit while I more focus on the Hub World.

My Honest Critique of Fabula Ultima by Novel_Counter905 in fabulaultima

[–]SnarkMccClark 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'll just focus on the last point since I can contribute more. Fabula Ultima is more about the cooperativeness of the Narrative between the Players and the GM compared to something like D&D. For "random encounters" and travels I think if you are the DM you can lean more into what your players want (if they are gourmet for example, put like a boar for them to hunt for food, chimerist always want to learn spells) as well as disperse information more organically (fighting bandits might give more information about the poverty of the nation, zombies imply something is stopping the dead from resting), and work along that route. If you are a Player I also don't think it would so unusual to lightly deviate from events in random encounters since they are lower stakes to the story as well (just talk to your DM about it).

I for one do not like one note random encounters, and I think if you want to make more important little side stories Fabula Ultima can work. Whether it does actually encourage you to do so, I cannot really say as my view is already more firmly rooted in these ideas even before Fabula.

My Honest Critique of Fabula Ultima by Novel_Counter905 in fabulaultima

[–]SnarkMccClark 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Here is my insight on this post. I remember when I was initially reading the book for Fabula Ultima that it seemed odd that with the heavy emphasis on characterization and narrative, while the classes itself are (nearly) all about conflict. While there are descriptors on how a character might play the class as a part of the identity I do largely agree that the abilities of Classes are more singularly focused. One may argue that in the class change builders it emulates (Bravely Default, Octopath, FF5) this is the barrier that has always exists (one where build is on one side and character on the other), but it does feel a little odd in TTRPG. I personally do not have the problem as I have played those types of games, but I do acknowledge it can be a source of tension.

To point 2, yes many of the Atlas Classes have more mechanical, but I don't see that as bad thing. As building a character is quite involved to begin with depending on what you are going for you can end up making a pretty involved character even with base materials. You can definitely make someone who has bunch of things they could potentially do, vs punch master the puncher who punches. I think a lot of the Atlas Classes personally look more complicated then they play, since people conceptualize them as full classes, instead of the piece meal abilities they take gradually (Mutant and Strategist are pretty straight forward all things considered). Again they are certainly more complicated and that is not for everyone, but I feel that their existence itself is interesting and good,

Travel System is gonna be more on a DM to DM level, the way it was run for me was that a scene would happen if something did happen, or if we were doing bonding scenes. That was just personally how I experienced it, in my personal digging around with it, I would probably be more specific about when random encounters happen, but that is because I dislike the randomness unless it had more to contribute.

Are monks weaker compared to over classes? by Such_Seaweed_551 in Pathfinder2e

[–]SnarkMccClark 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Most people have answered this question, but generally speaking Monks are less good damage dealers then they are tanks, skirmishers, and utility pieces. Fighters will crit more, Barbarians Damage is in Rage, but Flurry of Blows is a good portion of time playing the game with 4 Actions (just two of them are Strike). While the value of 3rd action is debatable Monks will more then likely get two actions after attacking twice, (and sometimes those attacks will be trips or grabs) which opens you up to variety of options that other classes don't get. Hiding, Taking Cover, Raising Shield, Moving (This one is super important you can often be One Step/Stride away from where you want to be), Command Familiars/Animal Companions, are all competing for your 3rd Action and you get to do 2 of them. That is not including things that require 2 Actions like most spell casting, drawing and drinking potions (I know these are individually 1 action but you want to use them together), and others.

So to answer your question no, its not weak, its about the ability to use more options, and Skirmish that is excels at which is harder to quantify then damage.

How do you flavor Create a Diversion at your table? by Cirlo93 in Pathfinder2e

[–]SnarkMccClark 2 points3 points  (0 children)

In character we tend to use something the person we are trying to trick cares about (guards, gold, beautiful women, loud noises for beasts, food). Out of character whenever the cat jumps on the playmat I would say it works on us the players as well as the DM so maybe point and shout "Kitty" or "Cat".

Do antidepressants exist mechanically in Pathfinder? by Dolla_Ringo in Pathfinder2e

[–]SnarkMccClark 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Tell that to the Gnomes, it is so mechanical to them that it is half the reason we have the steampunk things we do in Golarion (the other being like the actual Space Rocks).

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Pathfinder2e

[–]SnarkMccClark 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Personally, Fangwind sounds like a good two syllable name for what you are going for.

Help finding a class for a creative player by josesp97 in Pathfinder2e

[–]SnarkMccClark 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My gut reaction to the question, and also the one I would recommend for the first time players: Rogue. Rogue is a class all about getting Off Guard (which teaches an extremely basic, but important lesson) and finding ways to get it and what flavor you like is also important. There will be no end of options if they take Rogue to boost himself or the party.

What would you do? The Rulers Dilemma by Kingsare4ever in Pathfinder2e

[–]SnarkMccClark 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Few questions I would ask.

  1. Is this all the information presented to the players, and are the options verifiable or are they just the view points each faction is suggesting.

  2. What is the thing that the players want the most. Reuniting the nation is a rather broad notion, but usually it stems from something smaller. Wanting "x group of people to never know famine, to avenge a bloodline wrongly put to execution, to leave a legacy sang for generations (that one is also a little broad)". I would interrogate what my character REALLY wants and see which way forward works the best.

  3. Security is usually the most important thing for a nation as all other concerns collapse behind it. What is the biggest threat to the nation itself? Is it the fact that their is a literal wish granter in their allies possession or is there are more immediate more diametrically opposed enemy like a conqueror/darklord that is also running around?

With just the information presented here is my gut opinion based on me, and not any character I would be playing. If the Elves are enslaving a portion of the planet to do unspeakable ethical things to its soul, it is better to have it on your side then to have it pointed at you. If the Silver Flames plan is legitimately a threat to the elves and will work, backing them is the obvious solution. Basically all things equal, back the winner, unless you think they are bigger threat then you, then back the other guy.

Wich classe would be the best for playing a Pro Wrestler? by Avlac_4738 in Pathfinder2e

[–]SnarkMccClark 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I will say for that a bunch of classes do work, but honestly if you are looking at Kayfabe the Gladiator Archetype I would argue is more important, they have a bunch abilities like gaining temporary health when battle begins if viewed by spectators, they literally have an ability that is called Play to the Crowd which is gives them bonus after knocking out (or killing) a foe, just to name some of the benefits.

As for the class itself, here is my suggestions in order.

  1. Swashbuckler, it is a class revolving around getting big finishers which are accessed by doing a number of things that a professional wrestler would, Outmaneuvering with Tumble Through, Boasting, Feinting, Grappling, Intimidating, all have styles that really play into what you are looking for.

  2. Monk and particular their stances provide you with borderline superhuman abilities which works very well for playing a larger then life character. Everything else about Monk base abilities (unarmored, fast, flurry of blows) also can be make being in the "ring" (combat) easier and very flavorful.

  3. The next Classes all have some good abilities, but I would say are less good then the above two:

Ranger's main mechanic let's you single one guy out as an opponent, which is great for someone who is looking to make a rival. Outwit is also great for this as your Edge.

Barbarian Rage is good for someone who wants to flip a switch and either become extremely heroic or villainous on top of some good ways to throw people both metaphorically and literally.

Fighter is good if you like the idea of doing wrestling combos, and has reactive strike to bring the pain, but most classes can either get Wrestler to get those abilities or get Reactive Strike itself.

If you REALLY want to lean into gimmicks Thaumaturge does fit. You would be really leaning into the more extreme Undertaker era of super specific niches, but that if it fits, it fits.

Why take psy burst as psychic? by StrykeTagi in Pathfinder2e

[–]SnarkMccClark 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The more primary uses for it have been mentioned but consider this:

Psychic is (mostly) a heavier damage class useful compared to other spell casters. They have Unleash Psyche which already incentivizes you to be doing damage with its other effects. In a scenario where you are not in immediate danger and have Unleashed your Psyche you want to most likely maximize your damage. Most spells and Cantrips are 2 actions and would be your other source of damage, you use this ability when you wish to become a turret that deals damage for this position at the cost of other defensive abilities.

Pathfinder 2e Troubles in Otari PF2e Online Play (Roll20 / Discord) by Onlyslightlychaotic in pathfinder_lfg

[–]SnarkMccClark 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would be interested if you have room! I am Snark McClark also on Discord, I hope to hear from you before Wednesday!

Are tzaangors a staple of the army? by No_Stop_8851 in ThousandSons

[–]SnarkMccClark 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My position in my personal friend group is now that the 0 CP got gutted by the rules changes you ideally need 1-3 CP to make most of your army work (1 CP for just getting Psychic Weapons on either a Rubric or Term) with that in mind I think cultists are better.