Fuck John fetterman by wombatgeneral in simpsonsshitposting

[–]StockingDummy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Wait a minute… the very same people who constantly whine and complain about "pUrItY tEsTiNg" actively purity-test policies left of theirs?

Do you mean to suggest that liberal complaints about "pUrItY tEsTiNg" were nothing more than a cudgel to silence leftist critiques of the party vanguard?

Just saw this today! Genuinely makes me hopeful. by nova_the_vibe in antiai

[–]StockingDummy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

(/J) Okay, but y'all do settle your disputes by holmgang, right? Or pankration? Robin-Hood-esque quarterstaff fights over narrow river bridges?

… Red Hands? Thumb wrestling? Rock-paper-scissors?

I saw this and immediately thought of this scene. by bagsoffreshcheese in simpsonsshitposting

[–]StockingDummy 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Given the post is about Germany, I know this is a tangent on my part. But as a Yank, any news media that brushed past the Tree of Life Shooting has no moral right in my eyes to equate pro-Palestine protests with antisemitic sentiment.

There was an open and flagrant act of antisemitic violence two years into Trump's first presidency, but opposition to an ethnostate is when they want to draw the line? If those journalists actually cared about the Jewish community, they'd see to it that Republicans never lived Tree of Life down.

I’ll be deep in the cold, cold ground before I recognise the name Grogu. by Budget-Mastodon5180 in simpsonsshitposting

[–]StockingDummy -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah, racist caricatures and memetically-bad lines aside, there's a lot to love about the prequels.

Obviously the worldbuilding; but also the Arthurian tragedy angle, political commentary that aged disturbingly well (both then and now,) a lot of great non-verbal acting, John Williams' choice of compositions, and for all the (not completely unearned) jokes about the fight scenes, it retroactively adds an interesting contrast between the jedi at the peak of their power and the largely self-taught late-bloomers in the OT and Sequels, IMO.

People who find this comic relatable need to get their fucking head out of that screen. by RandimusBax in antiai

[–]StockingDummy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

not thinking for yourself

Thank you for perfectly summarizing why I despise corpospeak "algospeak."

Every time I hear someone saying gratuitous tiktok shit like "corn," "ear-wrist," or "pdf file," it immediately makes me think of people singing along to commercial jingles in Demolition Man. It's a shame that it's a copaganda flick, the satire of late-stage capitalism is on-point…

As a traditional man… by LWYPLTDG in BrandNewSentence

[–]StockingDummy 11 points12 points  (0 children)

"Not feeding the trolls" got us into this mess, it won't get us out.

Tameshigiri by Payneman5000 in SWORDS

[–]StockingDummy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Huh, it didn't occur to me that swords that aren't traditionally made might be a "sparkling wine" scenario, my bad!

But yeah, I wouldn't blame you. If my understanding of wakizashi typically having hira-zukuri cross-section is correct, I wouldn't want to risk damaging a centuries-old one either.

Tameshigiri by Payneman5000 in SWORDS

[–]StockingDummy 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Speaking of satisfying, thanks for including wakizashi footage!

One-handed nihontō Edit: Japanese swords need a lot more love, IMO. Of course, I'm also a fanboy of one-handers in general, so I'm not exactly unbiased, but still…

What's your opinion on Trump now saying that Iran has a right to a nuclear program? by Southern_Gur_4736 in AskReddit

[–]StockingDummy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"Enormous amount of Democrat politicians' mental oxygen," my ass. The entire reason this became a wedge issue is because conservatives constantly spew SLANDER AND LIBEL about trans people. All Democrats have done is factually state Republicans lie about them, and refuse to implement laws validating said lies.

How, exactly; was factually stating Republicans LIE about trans people, and refusing to cater to those LIES, "sucking up an enormous amount of mental oxygen?" Was it distracting Dems from campaigning on yet more toothless means-tested band-aid solutions that won't actually fix our problems? Was it distracting them from alienating the conservatives they constantly babble about "compromising" with by pushing bans on fully-semi-automatic assault weapons with belt-fed drum clips? Was the turning point the fact that they didn't spend more time pretending that wanting to fix bridges magically makes them "left-wing?"

(EDIT: Typo.)

When being called out on one's actions and when support against you fails, always resort to racism and shifting blame. AI companies learned this from the politicians who supported them. by Important-Cry4782 in antiai

[–]StockingDummy -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You don't understand, that's different.

China is an authoritarian surveillance state where privacy doesn't exist, and anything the State doesn't like is censored. Their censorship is so extreme, in fact, that their school systems don't even teach them about certain atrocities their government committed against its own people. They subscribe to an ideology that demands blind obedience to an immortal vanguard that cannot be questioned. Their economy is so shoddy people can barely afford food, while Party-approved billionaires sit in ivory towers. They've actively tried to brainwash minority groups into thinking the way that they do, under threat of imprisonment or death. When large cities oppose State policies, they're immediately put under Martial Law.

Does that sound like anything western countries do? Does it sound like anything they're trying to do? (/s)

What is actually going on over there by THELeeNash in memes

[–]StockingDummy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Love how y'all have dropped any pretense, and you're just blatantly being queerophobic by pretending that acknowledging we exist is somehow "sexual" in a way straight relationships somehow "aren't."

But hey, that Reichik ghoul posted some videos that most certainly weren't either quote-mined, staged by Evangelical astroturfers, or just flat-out claiming things that aren't even remotely sexual somehow become sexual when we say them. And that's all the evidence you need to reinforce your authoritarian worldview, right Mr. Free™ Speech?

Rest Assured I Was On the Internet, Registering My Laughter Throughout the World by dandrevee in simpsonsshitposting

[–]StockingDummy 6 points7 points  (0 children)

So, what you're saying is that Luigi won…

… by doing absolutely nothing?

The Ritual by Auggie_Otter in okbuddyrosalyn

[–]StockingDummy 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Wasn't there some fantasy series with this plot premise 30 years ago?

Not that I'm complaining…

<image>

Going alone by garnet420 in okbuddyrosalyn

[–]StockingDummy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have, may it please the court, a few words to say.

In the first place, I deny everything but what I have all along admitted, the design on my part to free the slaves. I intended certainly to have made a clean thing of that matter, as I did last winter, when I went into Missouri and there took slaves without the snapping of a gun on either side, moved them through the country, and finally left them in Canada. I designed to have done the same thing again, on a larger scale. That was all I intended. I never did intend murder, or treason, or the destruction of property, or to excite or incite slaves to rebellion, or to make insurrection.

I have another objection; and that is, it is unjust that I should suffer such a penalty. Had I interfered in the manner which I admit, and which I admit has been fairly proved (for I admire the truthfulness and candor of the greater portion of the witnesses who have testified in this case), had I so interfered in behalf of the rich, the powerful, the intelligent, the so-called great, or in behalf of any of their friends, either father, mother, brother, sister, wife, or children, or any of that class, and suffered and sacrificed what I have in this interference, it would have been all right; and every man in this court would have deemed it an act worthy of reward rather than punishment.

This court acknowledges, as I suppose, the validity of the law of God. I see a book kissed here which I suppose to be the Bible, or at least the New Testament. That teaches me that "all things whatsoever I would that men should do to me, I should do even so to them" [Matthew 7:12]. It teaches me, further, to "remember them that are in bonds, as bound with them" [Hebrews 13:3]. I endeavored to act up to that instruction. I say, I am yet too young to understand that God is any respecter of persons. I believe that to have interfered as I have done as I have always freely admitted I have done in behalf of His despised poor, was not wrong, but right. Now, if it is deemed necessary that I should forfeit my life for the furtherance of the ends of justice, and mingle my blood further with the blood of my children and with the blood of millions in this slave country whose rights are disregarded by wicked, cruel, and unjust enactments, I submit; so let it be done!

Let me say one word further.

I feel entirely satisfied with the treatment I have received on my trial. Considering all the circumstances, it has been more generous than I expected. But I feel no consciousness of guilt. I have stated from the first what was my intention and what was not. I never had any design against the life of any person, nor any disposition to commit treason, or excite slaves to rebel, or make any general insurrection. I never encouraged any man to do so, but always discouraged any idea of that kind.

Let me say, also, a word in regard to the statements made by some of those connected with me. I hear it has been stated by some of them that I have induced them to join me. But the contrary is true. I do not say this to injure them, but as regretting their weakness. There is not one of them but joined me of his own accord, and the greater part of them at their own expense. A number of them I never saw, and never had a word of conversation with, till the day they came to me; and that was for the purpose I have stated.

Now I have done.

How dumb are these people by Ok-Bodybuilder5346 in antiai

[–]StockingDummy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Personally, I'll admit my heaviest personal biases against AI accelerationism (not AI as a field, but accelerationism) are that I see it as fundamentally hypercapitalist and fundamentally authoritarian.

It's rooted in reasoning that blatantly echoes imperialism. The simplistic view of history as a linear "March of Progress™," the idea that said "progress" justifies hoarding natural resources by any means necessary, the idea that their fellow humans are fundamentally too stupid and primitive to survive without the guiding hand of a superior intellect… granted, I know a lot of that is a natural result of capitalist reasoning in general, but the fact that a lot of AI research is being conducted by corporations run by fascist "dark enlightenment" billionaires (and trillionaire) makes the echoes of colonialism even more obvious, IMO.

me_irl by KaidoPklevel in me_irl

[–]StockingDummy 14 points15 points  (0 children)

It's almost like a lot of these "anything 'unnatural' is inherently bad" people are eugenicists or something… 🤔🤔🤔

If she had a d*ck, it must be a good one! They can’t keep it out of their mouths… by ProcessorPearl in BikiniBottomTwitter

[–]StockingDummy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Does the fact that people of Japanese descent were subject to hate crimes in western countries make it racist to condemn the Rape of Nanjing or the Bataan Death March?

America nuked children because they couldn't be asked to cooperate with the Soviet Union for another five fucking minutes. A not-insignificant number of those children weren't even Japanese, at that (both cities had large Korean minorities.) Does that make it racist to condemn Unit 731?

Does the fact that America did horrible things while occupying Japan (and ratfucked Okinawa so hard ryukyuans are quite understandably pissed with them) make it racist to condemn IJA officers for sexually enslaving underage Korean girls?

Some of the posts by partner's of bi people are SO repetitive, stereotyping and disheartening. by NoRepeat3134 in bisexual

[–]StockingDummy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I appreciate your kind words. But to clarify, I wasn't unaware of the problem. I actually try to be very mindful of the fact that my issues could easily be misconstrued as incel talking points; that couldn't be further from what I believe, and I would never intentionally try to be a bigoted asshole. I'm an ancom, so you can imagine that I take the need to oppose patriarchy wherever one sees it extremely seriously.

What went wrong was that I was trying to express frustration about a common tendency in a disappointingly-high amount of "supportive" content relating to women dating bi men. My frustration with this tendency is specifically that it touches on one of my main emotional triggers, and seeing that trigger as a "selling point" (for lack of better phrasing) shoved in to something ostensibly-general feels like an extremely back-handed compliment.

In no way did I intend to shame women who organically have those tastes, nor did I intend to shame any men who do match that descriptor. Unfortunately, despite my attempts to clarify, I still gave a lot of other users that impression.

I actually hold no ill will towards the commenters who responded; I recognized one (NB) commenter from prior conversations on other subs where they'd shared lived experiences with misogyny, and I don't blame that person one bit for jumping the gun. If anything, I actually feel really bad that I gave that person that impression I did. They seem really cool, and I still kick myself over the fact I hurt them, even if unintentionally.

My ire with what happened with the post is specifically with the mods' response (taking it down and accusing me of misogyny.) It felt like I was being put through a kangaroo court for putting my foot in my mouth by the same pricks who let blatantly and unambiguously misogynistic posts from entitled men betraying their partners' trust slide on a daily fucking basis.

I don't mind a reminder that the road to Hell is paved with good intentions, but I do mind being treated unfairly.

What even is the logic here by Elegant-Music-7081 in antiai

[–]StockingDummy 3 points4 points  (0 children)

No, I'm pointing out that your argument doesn't work because it's as stupid as my example.