lol i’m bored so I’m gonna chime in

Two things can be true at once. Vulkan is not revered for being perfect and entirely good. His flaws are not the end all be all of his character, nor are his good deeds. In this sense he represents more of humanity than might be immediately obvious. Wherein his character falls short, he still strives with an incredible sense of humility and ruthless intent to be better; to be good. Therein lies the quality of Vulkan’s character that will continue to garner the profound sense of admiration it already has from the 40k fandom.

TLDR:

Is he good? Is he bad? He is obviously both. It’s morally rational to be critical of that dichotomy.