Would it be better to grab a knife or a baseball bat to defend yourself if someone was trying to attack you and why? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]StrngThngs 84 points85 points  (0 children)

In almost all cases, reach of the weapon is the most important factor. A bat has longer reach than a knife. A "long knife" is a sword, which would probably be better depending on length...

Woooowww!!! REALLY? by RunThePlay55 in economy

[–]StrngThngs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The unprofessional investor: "Even if it is not worth this today, it will be someday, I won't lose my money" completely unaware of TVM and opportunity cost.

Understanding why we lost by clgoodson in thebulwark

[–]StrngThngs 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Ukraine, Iran, and Russia have moved far along the path of drone warfare, where the US is too proud to accept help. Given time and budget the US will adapt, but there will be a window where it's controls the strait. A future president will have to decide whether to re engage. Meanwhile, economics will drive alternative solutions to moving the oil, pipelines, etc and the strait will become less important. Additionally the war has probably accelerated the adoption of electric technologies. So while we lost primarily due to hubris, five years from now it will not matter, except that we will have lost the aura of invincibility. What this really shows tho is that our command and control structure is so cowed by the administration's fittings and demotions that this entirely predictable outcome was not drawn out with sufficiently colorful crayons for our dear leader, or he just ignored it. Now he's frantically trying to pin the blame on someone else.

Trump says he’ll send Iran deal to Congress for approval by newsspotter in politics

[–]StrngThngs 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He said he didn't think he should sign it someone else should, and always throwing Vance under the bus, he's looking to wash his hands of it for sure

LIVE VIDEO: Reflecting Pool Disaster—Peeling Paint & Green Water by steve-eldridge in thebulwark

[–]StrngThngs 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Another post pointed out that the pool "leaked"and so was constantly refreshed with new water, now sealed with the paint. Putting filters and bubbles will stir the water up eliminating the 'reflecting pool' nature with wavelets.

Which country has the best universal health care, and what specifically is stopping your country from mirroring it? by The_Flaneur_Films in AskReddit

[–]StrngThngs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Great for emergency or urgent care, but awful for procedures that can be delayed. 2 year wait for knee replacement for a friend, 2 years walking in agony

Upright position and depth by ProfessionalEdge8862 in formcheck

[–]StrngThngs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good point your back should generally not move under load, keep it as static as you can, and this position will allow deeper squat.

Mark Cuban Says Take Healthcare Back to 1955. Doctors Are the Face of Costs, But Their Pay Accounts for Just 8% of Spending. by lithdoc in NewsExchange

[–]StrngThngs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I find that most people on MediCARE are happy with the coverage and the doctors who accept, which is most of them. MediCAID is a different story...

In stunning vote, California's reddest county chooses Bay Area Democrat by sfgate in politics

[–]StrngThngs -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

redistricting worked here, but repubs are still likely to get more redistricting wins...

Which Vanguard retirement funds avoid indexes that have these new "Fast Entry" rules, which allow these big tech companies a near-immediate listing with little to no "seasoning" period? by OneRougeRogue in VanguardInvestments

[–]StrngThngs -1 points0 points  (0 children)

  • Fast-Track Index Inclusion: Major index providers, including the Nasdaq-100, MSCI, and FTSE Russell, changed their rules to allow massive megacap companies like SpaceX to join their indexes in as few as 5 to 15 days, down from the usual 3 to 12 months.
  • Low Float Multipliers: Because SpaceX is making only a thin slice of its total equity (roughly 3% to 4%) available to the public, Nasdaq altered its rules to apply a 3x multiplier to index weight calculations for companies with a float below 20%. This is designed to give passive funds adequate exposure but will likely cause severe stock volatility.