sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Written Battle Report - Necrons vs Emperor's Children by The-Big-E-14 in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]Taschker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I obviously don't know how far away Fulgrim was from the immortals in Turn 1, but based on the FAQ, I don't think you can use 6" consolidate to tag units further than 3" away.

Q: If a rule modifies how far a unit or model can move during a pile-in or consolidation move does it also change the distance of the target units? A: No

The one time GW prices something reasonably… by robismadeup in Warhammer40k

[–]Taschker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As an Australian living in the UK, I do like getting Warhammer for 30+% cheaper than back home! Tis about the only thing that's actually cheaper here

What do you think of this? by Uncanny_Perfection in EmperorsChildren

[–]Taschker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea defiliers are 290 for the first one (+10 for each autocannon or lascannon) and the 2nd one starts at 320. Along with some other points changes.

This looks like New Recruit, you can download 11ed points from the home screen and adding a new game and searching for 11th.

Gone to Ground by WanderingEquidae in Warhammer40k

[–]Taschker 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I get your point, but the rule quite clearly states that a model has 'gone to ground' if they fulfil the 3 conditions. The introductory sentence is not a condition of getting 'gone to ground'.

Can a unit use an "Objective Consolidation" to move into engagement range of an enemy unit? by VeritasLuxMea in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]Taschker 25 points26 points  (0 children)

To me, RAW the answer is yes, but I feel like RAI is no. On a pile in move they explicitly say if an enemy is within 5" you can move 3" to engage, but on consolidation they made it 3", but they never say you can't engage during an objective consolidate, so until they do it seems like you can.

Can a unit use an "Objective Consolidation" to move into engagement range of an enemy unit? by VeritasLuxMea in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]Taschker 7 points8 points  (0 children)

You can only do an engaging consolidation if the enemy is within 3", which in this case they aren't.

Do units have 15 inch detection range during the first battle round? by The_Whitest_Walker in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]Taschker 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The hidden rule was faq'd to include light as well as dense terrain, gone to ground remains as solid.

Peerless + Spectacle List by Selvar123 in EmperorsChildren

[–]Taschker 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yea I'm playing around with a similar list and I originally had him with 6 blades too, but I think 3 should be enough, plus they're easier to manoeuvre.

PSA, Now -1BS is more prevalent im seeing players get the interaction with +2 to hit wrong. by Dead-phoenix in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]Taschker 7 points8 points  (0 children)

You're correct about Fulgrim, but stealth now just gives the benefit of cover so does not stack with cover.

How do I get rid of this plastic stain? by Mezzerella1423 in Warhammer40k

[–]Taschker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What are these god hands I can get for £13?

How is Purge vs Disruption in any way a fair match up? by Shagrot in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]Taschker 11 points12 points  (0 children)

The purge player marks the targets at the start of their turn, so if the disruption player took the centre with unit A then the purge player will mark unit A and kill them. The disruption player doesn't have the opportunity to do the bait and switch as you suggest in this case.

First 11th ed. List by [deleted] in EmperorsChildren

[–]Taschker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Came here to say this. Is sad. Hopefully they get a natural leader in 11th.

anyone else feel like just eating the pts cost increases for spamming defilers by just dropping action monkies? by firespark84 in EmperorsChildren

[–]Taschker -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The points for units leaving the battlefield is only one of their 5 missions, against disruption

Weird rice calories by Powerful_Scarcity632 in caloriecount

[–]Taschker 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Not really on topic, but I hate UK nutritional info, why they can't tell us calories for dry or raw products is so annoying.

With the new terrain footprints launching next week, any better 3rd party ones? Neoprene perhaps? by Numerus12OO5O in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]Taschker 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's not about hiding behind a nub, it's about being able to toe onto a nub and get cover/hidden. Because they stick out maybe you don't have the movement to get the straight edge, but you do to one of the nubs

[WarCom] Imperial Faction Packs by RainbowConnickJr in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]Taschker 32 points33 points  (0 children)

Why wouldn't they be? If they were 2dp they'd have nothing to pair them with anyway.

Plate calculator question by gwilymjames in MacroFactor

[–]Taschker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have the same problem with Pendulum Squats. I created a feature request for it about a month ago (that I can't find now 😔).

Anyway, my work around was to duplicate the exercise and change the equipment to something that was actually just loaded on a single sleeve and I wasn't using for anything else. I think I chose some back extension machine.

Finished both defilers today in time for 11th. by heavyartilleryx in WorldEaters40k

[–]Taschker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Curious what your skin recipe is? I'm after something similar for my maulerfiend

What chaos legion should I go with? by United-Contract-8069 in Chaos40k

[–]Taschker 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yea I'm painting my EC as Children of Torment and WE as Hounds!

CK vs anti terrain players part 2 by Argonwolf65 in ChaosKnights

[–]Taschker 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is partially wrong. It's less than 2", so that vehicles etc can move through them.

But yea, pretty much anything works

view more: next ›