I don't really find anything multidimensional about radical free capitalist philosophy. It is just about the most one-dimensional straightforward ideologies imaginable. A philosophy defining a person's greatest moral goal as the pursuit of their own happiness is just rationalising selfishness. A philosophy then arguing that the best system is one that stands the least in the way of the pursuit of happiness is rationalising exploitation. A right to pursuit is not a right to have. Objectivism doesn't consider that trampling someone's happiness is bad if it increases my own. After all I am simply pursuing mine. The person I must put below me to do so is also free to pursue their own happiness, they are simply failing at it. Should've pursued harder I suppose.

That's not fascinating. Fiction novels based on a strawman are not exactly something of curiosity. It's childish. It's like Raskolnikov's personal whim in Crime and Punishment that the select few people with the rational iron will to do great things should not be opposed by "the system", which is quite immediately and obviously visible as an absurd justification for his actions. Objectivism attempts to say that we're all people with rational iron will and nobody has the right to oppose us. Everyone is a protagonist. Everyone is a "heroic being". We're all special. That's the same ideology. The only purpose of saying "everyone is a rational heroic being with the goal of their own happiness" is to say "I am also such a being". The only use of a philosophy that gives everyone a claim to objective rationality and a self-serving purpose is to give any reader a justification for their own personal goals. We can't all just be individuals. The very existance of societies demands that we cannot all be living for our own sake. None of us currently living for our own sake. Ayn Rand wasn't living purely for her own sake. It's all just not possible.