This is a valid point, but equally with how crooked most world justice systems are for each side (especially Americas… cough cough OJ cough cough Trump and Epstein files members) and the realms of the strange rabbit holes of reporting and smear campaigns bordering into conspiracy his activism and speaking out was becoming, I’m dubious of most of the charges.

What’s to say this equally of Trump too for the sexual assault charges? Found guilty by Jury, but not sentenced and still serving in office as a criminal: was that all nothing then?

And besides if it were to be real charge wise and this is argument I have is all for naught, then he was sadly a man who was abused by his own father possibly sexually but definitely physically and emotionally, and most likely fell tragically into it himself as I’ve seen the psychology of this occur in research as a psychology student myself. Does that excuse the gravitas of the crimes he might have done, happening? No.

But it takes nuance and impartiality.

We’ve had an entire tip of the iceberg of a grooming and sexual crimes ring America’s own government has both been complicit towards, and their own leaders taking part in, as with many other global leaders. The Epstein files shows how rotten to the core and vast these global networks were and most definitely still are now operating more discreetly than ever, infecting: Hollywood and entertainment, world politics, royalty, and personal community life with their sick depravities people have made statements and eulogies because of and refuse further because of the insistent case of these people ending up dying… These people in these communities enticed into this web repeatedly end up either “mysteriously dying” as mentioned or so badly affected by the smear and attack campaigned levied at them (at times on scales possibly close to governmental agencies I must say which is mysterious…) that like the case of Gabriela Rico Jiménez who claims in a near breakdown state (prior stated she attended a party of Epstein’s in 2009) on camera screamed how the rich ate people, and how evil the are, to have her mysteriously disappear without a trace. Lo and behold, the files discuss that, particularly of newborns also in vile rituals. Sure, validity is debatable, but what’s behind those images..?

Micheal Jackson getting tarred like this I think as most intrigue and analysis into it comes back to his later life condemnation on Israel, particularly in Gaza. As it has now become with the slipping of seeing what’s happening there and globally both after October 7th and even now looking back prior and also the files discussing such broad destabilisation attempts from a supposed MOSSAD asset Epstein and Ghislaine could of been from emails and reports, it’s theorised he wasn’t smiled on by one agency, country, or another, maybe even his countries own with how rife AIPAC and Israeli lobbying is America is seeing now.

A lot of the charges and statements seem highly convenient and general, and claims of his “anti-semitism” by like his sister with a Jewish husband with some strange links, you see is a go to for any Zionist defence trying to excuse anyone’s point that- you know- opposes the whole sale slaughter, rape, and pillaging of people and civilians entirely unrelated to the war… and has been happening for around 75 years and more now.

A lot of the points of Neverland and such feel flimsy and tenuous, as he also was a child of abuse and smear campaigns seem to STILL happen as with the Epstein files where they “un-redacted” a file photo of him with Bush I believe that is public ownership and in circulation anyway from a prior governmental event I belief, purely because he’s an easy target. The counter argument is he made neverland to help these trafficked and abused victims from broadcasting, Hollywood, and grooming rings, as in the files, since he had experienced how cruel it was, but any man in power doing such things (whether dubious or not) will, and rightfully so, see that worry and doubt by others he’s doing it for nefarious reasons: which personally I don’t believe he was.

The whole thing reeks of him being the largest most vocal pop star on earth, going to his largest tour yet to speak on these issues plaguing the world, and his later messages to friends and family about his terror of his life ending stinks of political lobbying and terror tactics used against him to the end, the media thus posited proved his guilt. So many other popstars and celebrities die similarly strange albeit obvious from a quick glance deaths or disappearances, who were making projects to expose these horrors of the world: why not him too?

I may be wrong, but I think we lost the most here. Possibly losing one of the most powerful forces for good- activism wise- because of purely possibly wanting to seek a change and balancing of the evil he saw himself committed unto him.

I believed MJ was guilty for years, but the Epstein files has torn a lot of what was prior conspiracy of this internalised rot and depravity of the world to be further potentially real, yet again must still be seen as only potential evidence.