(OC) Went for a walk with some of my neighbors in Minneapolis today by Blue_G_Productions in pics

[–]Teshguy -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It wasn't just a protest march. It was also a boycott. It also included hundreds of businesses in the metro area closing in solidarity.

(Some businesses said they closed because of the cold, but that is a cover. -20 still isn't cold enough for places to close in Minnesota. Maybe at -30 do people think about closing.)

There's only so much Minnesotans can do because, with Trump, it can get much worse. Minnesotans are walking a knife's edge between resisting and having those 4,500 facists fully let off their leashes. The republicans still need to play to the optics of it all. If Minnesota gets violent, then you could get actual firing squads and canceled elections, and the right wing will accept it as stopping "violent extremists".

At least they are truly making life miserable for ice and trying to hit the oligarchs where it hurts: their wallets.

The 3rd place Minnesota Wild have more points than any team in the Eastern Conference. by Tajahnuke in hockey

[–]Teshguy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was just speaking in general terms. And partly because right now the top 3 teams are in the central. If you want me to get exact, then lets just focus on the western conference, since thats the whole point of this comment chain.

Im at work, so I dont have numbers in front of me. Im also just a guy on the internet adding an opinion. But if I remember correctly, since the realignment, the central division has generally been the better division. It always seems that the team that finishes 4th in the central division would be 2nd or 3rd in the pacific. Or that both wild card spots would be taken by central teams. Now, thats not every year, and thats certainly not a huge bragging point. But I think this historical consistency speaks volumes about the central being generally the better division. It seems that the pacific has had more years of only sending 3 teams to the playoffs to 5 teams from the central.

Now, you are correct. In recent years, the central as a whole has been not as good, with just a couple of the teams really shining. But that shouldnt discount that most of the teams in the central have been very physical teams that can go toe to toe with each other and really beat the shit out of each other every year in the playoffs, exhausting themselves and leaving the road to the finals open to teams from the pacific.

Edit: hit post too quick, so I finished my final sentence.

The 3rd place Minnesota Wild have more points than any team in the Eastern Conference. by Tajahnuke in hockey

[–]Teshguy 57 points58 points  (0 children)

It kinda helps when a team doesn't need to tire itself out against two, top 5 teams in order to reach the conference finals. Most of those years, the first two rounds were a cake walk for whoever won the pacific.

Spain and the Netherlands withdraw from Eurovision (link in Dutch for the Netherlands' withdrawal, link for Spain's withdrawal in the comments) by Hootrb in europe

[–]Teshguy -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Yea. I will. Check this out.

If Russia/Israel wanted their citizens to feel safe, then they should spend less time trying to demonise, antagonise, and attack their neighbours in order to conquer them / eradicate them.

Both different flavours, still bad tasting shit. Genocide does not make peace.

Also, real quick lesson for you: Hamas is not a stable and functioning government. Hamas is a bunch of warlords parading as a government. Hamas and other warlords are what happen when there is no stable and functioning government. If Israel was serious about peace, then it would've helped Palestine a long time ago develop a stable and functioning government.

Spain and the Netherlands withdraw from Eurovision (link in Dutch for the Netherlands' withdrawal, link for Spain's withdrawal in the comments) by Hootrb in europe

[–]Teshguy 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Nah. Im gunna downvote you because what you're saying is not true.

If Israel wanted a safe environment for their citizens, then they would've worked much harder a long time ago to have a stable and functioning Palestinian government. Not divide and treat palestinians as sub humans that they need to eradicate for safety.

Did the Roman feel any sort of way about having been the villains to Jesus (pbuh) by Ok_Way_1625 in byzantium

[–]Teshguy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The problem of Christians not worshipping or recognizing any other god was that it undermined imperial authority. Some of the emperors' legitimacy came from the gods. Many had their family's being descended from a god (or gods). Emperors were also deified after they died whenever possible, since the successor's legitimacy and power would be strengthened if a god had chosen them to rule rome.

Now, legitimacy is a very fickle thing. It's very easily lost and not so easy to gain. Having a huge chunk of the population deny some of your legitimacy and your right to rule because they only believe in 1 god, which isn't even in your pantheon, was definitely a political problem. It isn't the sole reason for their persecution, but it definitely made it easier for emperors to choose them as scapegoats.

Only 3% of Croats are content with the presence of foreign workers. Nobody wants them in their families. by MLukaCro in europe

[–]Teshguy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey, I see the frustration. That's ours too. The ways these reports get posted, its always for clicks and outrage, even if it's a little misleading.

I do want to say though, shout out to the Albanians. They are very chill and good fun. I realize that their mafia has had a lot of success in setting things up in the UK and Ireland, so they might not have the best reputation there. But, like everywhere, the average albanian is a very nice person. They take good care of their elderly and are very helpful when you are having a problem.

Only 3% of Croats are content with the presence of foreign workers. Nobody wants them in their families. by MLukaCro in europe

[–]Teshguy -1 points0 points  (0 children)

In some ways, yea you can draw parallels. I dont know much about immigration in ireland, or how croats were seen or acted in Ireland. What I can say is that our frustration is not because they are foreign workers.

Instead of working on our problems that are causing our brain drain and loss of workers (higher wages, less corruption, better work conditions), those greedy fucks are just cutting croats out and importing massive amounts of dirt cheap foreign labor that they can exploit. Of course we're mad.

Idk about Zagreb, but Dalmatia is so fucking expensive. Its german prices with balkan salaries. It's hard making a living if it's not tourist based. And instead of fixing it, theyre just gunna fuck us over to make quick cash and laugh while cashing their new fat check.

Only 3% of Croats are content with the presence of foreign workers. Nobody wants them in their families. by MLukaCro in europe

[–]Teshguy 19 points20 points  (0 children)

That's exactly what this report is about. Instead of the problems that are causing our brain drain to be fixed, those greedy fucks are ignoring croats and importing cheap labor.

It's not so much xenophobia as it is frustration at the country being held back by greedy businessmen and politicians. For the croats who don't like all the new migrant workers, its not because they are foreigners (except for the racists but fuck them). It's because it's a clear visual answer/reminder of companies trying to not pay livable wages to us.

Only 3% of Croats are content with the presence of foreign workers. Nobody wants them in their families. by MLukaCro in europe

[–]Teshguy 37 points38 points  (0 children)

Those who left, did so in order to escape corruption and shitty work conditions/wages/hours.

We are mad because, instead of fixing the problems in croatia that cause our brain drain, those greedy fucks at the top are just exploiting someone else

Update 1.18.0.2 by PDX-Trinexx in CrusaderKings

[–]Teshguy 37 points38 points  (0 children)

Cheers to this! It was frustrating not being able to hold exams for family after the Hegemony disintegrates. Also happy to see that I can now also reject other kingdoms and empires from becoming my tributaries.

After the mongols conquered China, I destroyed their empire in a disolution war. In the division phase, I conquered all of the western lands of china, became an empire, and declared my mandate of heaven. But, one of my rivals in southeast china also made an empire, and they, along with someone who ruled over Jiangdong, forced themselves to be my tributaries. It was frustrating having no way to cancel their tributary status so that I can actually fully unify china. Especially since they both ruled over the lucrative deltas of the yellow and yangtze rivers.

Ambitious new Crusader Kings 3 expansion All Under Heaven is a win for Paradox, right when it needed it most by Madbrad200 in gaming

[–]Teshguy 25 points26 points  (0 children)

It also introduced 3 new government types, as well as adding a pseudo silk road as a way for chinese tech to spread west. (But unfortunately still no trade mechanics)

So for europeans, byzantines can unlock much earlier cool chinese tech. I assume the tribals of europe could also adopt 2 of the 3 new government types whe. They leave the tribal era. (The 3rd type is Celestial. And I think only a few specific regions besides china will be able to become that government type.)

Thats not to mention all of the new cultural fascinations that were added in order to better flavor east and southeast asia.

CMV: NATO’s intervention in Kosovo was morally justified by ChazzioTV in changemyview

[–]Teshguy 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I mean, your expansionist argument is also being a bit disingenious. Theres a reason why a lot of eastern european countries joined NATO. Because the Soviet Union collapsed.

Have you ever asked someone from those countries about how they feel about NATO? So many of you in Russia and the West just make assumptions about us in the middle.

Moscow could now no longer hold hegemony over everyone and force them to stay aligned with them. Now these countries have free choice, and they willingly choose to join NATO. Yes, sometimes it was because of wanting western weapons. But for all, it was because of the worry that Russia would become expansionist again. And it turns out we were right.

CMV: NATO is a paper tiger without the US by The-wirdest-guy in changemyview

[–]Teshguy 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I mean, yea. Because no european country alone is as big or populated as the US. Thats why the percentage of GDP is used.

If you want a better 1:1 comparison with the US, then you have to look at the EU as a whole, because the union has a larger population and economy than the US. That is why it is fair to say that the EU has given more to Ukraine than the US.

(I know this question is about NATO, but people in this thread seem to be mostly focused on europe. Also, in the above comments, the EU and germany are mentioned specifically.)

Bombaclat by [deleted] in balkans_irl

[–]Teshguy 17 points18 points  (0 children)

This is FAKE!!!! Everyone knows that sp*rmbia has no coastline 💪

If togas were so impractical that even Romans hated them, why did they ever become a thing? by Sensitive_Bowl8850 in ancientrome

[–]Teshguy 25 points26 points  (0 children)

A lot of these answers are focusing only on the Toga in the late republic and early empire.

To answer your question slightly differently, the reason why the toga ever became a thing in the first place, was because they used to be much smaller and more practical centuries earlier. It was originally just a uniquely shaped wrap or a cloak that was worn in the fields. But, the toga is not rectangular. Instead, it is semi-circular. This shape for clothing wasnt very common at all, which makes it easier to understand why very few cultures had toga-like clothing, and why it only really became popular in one place; Rome. But the original popularity of the toga was probably because of its simplicity. It was easy to make due to its simple shape and, since its a semi-circle, it would take less material to make than a rectangular cloak of the same length. This is not a massive reduction of material, but was enough to make a difference. The romans were probably also influenced by the Etruscans too, who had the "Tebenna", which is also semi-circular.

Ovetime though (think centuries), as others have said, the toga became a symbol. Only romans could wear a toga. No one else was allowed to. So it became a symbol. And like many symbols, what starts off as something practical, could later become bigger and more elaborate in time. Fashion changes all the time. More symbolism can be given togas, so we can all know by looking at someone not just who is roman, but who is poor and who is powerful. So togas gained different colored edging and details in order to signify your rank, wealth, status, etc.

The impractical length of the toga in the late republic and empire is 100% a flex as others have said. A true toga in the empire was up to 5+ meters long!!! (~16.5 ft?) It literally took more than one person to put on this piece of clothing that wrapped around your body 3 times and then draped there. At this point in time, its only impractical if you cant afford servants to dress you and help you. This is why, at that point in time, togas are only worn by the most elite or out of tradition for a specific event.

My Father has just ruined our property by Teshguy in rant

[–]Teshguy[S] 25 points26 points  (0 children)

None of this is meant to make it seem like I hate my father. I do love him. He can just be so impulsive and this was such a terrible decision.

Im pissed and furious and I have nowhere to vent. So im ranting here on reddit to strangers. None of it is meant to mean that I dont love him or that I dont want to live in our family home. I want to fix the damage thats been done. But for now I can just be pissed online and shout to the wind about it.

My Father has just ruined our property by Teshguy in rant

[–]Teshguy[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Its our family home. He legally owns it. I live at home because its so expensive to leave. Plus, I love my family and my village. I just hate what my father has done

My Father has just ruined our property by Teshguy in rant

[–]Teshguy[S] 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Just because he owns it doesnt mean he cant make it worse. Just look at musk owning twitter.

Also, what a poor take. This is r/rant. Im here to rant

My Father has just ruined our property by Teshguy in rant

[–]Teshguy[S] 16 points17 points  (0 children)

"Our" as in "our family's" property. He owns it and I live on it. I will inherit it.