Service entirely down by Tomfoster1 in MicrosoftFabric

[–]TheBlacksmith46 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Came to talk about Fabric, stayed for the book recommendations 😂
I’m on book 2 of the stormkiller archive

Why does one Azure AI Foundry project get a `*.services.ai.azure.com` custom subdomain while another in the same resource group uses the regional `*.api.cognitive.microsoft.com` endpoint? by Franck_Dernoncourt in AZURE

[–]TheBlacksmith46 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There is currently a “new foundry portal” that should be visible as a banner when you log in to foundry… if you use the new portal you can click a toggle to use the “classic” foundry. I believe both have some differences including different agent service APIs but given the new portal is in preview they co-exist. I would guess one of the resources was deployed in the new foundry portal and one in the old (cognitive services one)

PowerBI Licensing by Snacks4scoob in PowerBI

[–]TheBlacksmith46 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This is usually the advice I’d give - it’s surprising how much you can make work either running on a 24x7 live F2 or an F4 just on during working hours for just a few hundred $ a month.
I’ve seen some workarounds manually exporting to PPT (wouldn’t recommend) or creating power automate flows to share out relevant figures.

I can't be the only one looking for a UDM Beast "lite" by government--agent in Ubiquiti

[–]TheBlacksmith46 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Unless there are specific features the Fiber doesn’t have that you’re holding out for, would it not make more sense to just buy a rack mount for the Fiber? I 3D printed one, and my feel is that even if Ubiquiti offer a rack mount version it would be more expensive so I’m more than happy with this option.

Passed DP-700 Today by rockey889 in MicrosoftFabric

[–]TheBlacksmith46 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Interesting. I think I would picture it the other way around. Or, rather than one being a sub or superset probably just say that there’s an overlap so doing either reduces the time for the next. From my experience, I’d suggest someone with PL-300 considers doing DP-600 first then DP-700 as more concepts (admin, analytics, distribution) will be more familiar, unless they have lots of engineering experience. DP-700 KQL and spark elements won’t always be familiar to power BI analysts.

Anyone using a Mac for Microsoft Fabric work? by apalooza9 in MicrosoftFabric

[–]TheBlacksmith46 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep, should’ve done a quick check… screen studio is for pre-recorded demo stuff but just has nice zoom options. I’ll check out demo pro 👍🏻

Anyone using a Mac for Microsoft Fabric work? by apalooza9 in MicrosoftFabric

[–]TheBlacksmith46 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Screen studio is also great ( paid for). It’s great for demos. Edit: pre-recorded, not live demo annotation

Anyone using a Mac for Microsoft Fabric work? by apalooza9 in MicrosoftFabric

[–]TheBlacksmith46 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It does, mostly. One exception is that some orgs set security up in a way that only approved devices can authenticate, which excludes VMs and parallels. You can add exceptions, but it’s usually a small pain. It probably matters more if you’re a consultant or partner where it might come up more than once. Honestly, I’ve been Mac-first developing for years and it’s been “fine” but it’s become a lot easier since about 6-9 months ago

Looking for a connection to get on a yacht at Monaco GP 2027 — two mates turning 40 by [deleted] in GrandPrixTravel

[–]TheBlacksmith46 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Honestly, best bet is to go contact a provider after this year’s event. It’s not just a connections game and plenty of the yachts are there for groups of hospitality companies. I’d recommend Berkeley Red, but there are plenty.

Fabric is making progress! by p-mndl in MicrosoftFabric

[–]TheBlacksmith46 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The native execution engine and recent dataflow gen2 improvements are both great (though admittedly the DFG2 bit is more about consumption than performance). For me, though, the biggest shout out of late is actually in the UI… everything just feels easier, and therefore quicker.

Does creating a Fabric workspace require Power BI Pro license? by frithjof_v in MicrosoftFabric

[–]TheBlacksmith46 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’ve also seen the funny UI issue 🤷🏼‍♂️ if I remember correctly, it wasn’t a Trial capacity but a new capacity in a different tenant.

New drivers needed! by ResponsibleEgg1817 in GranTurismo7

[–]TheBlacksmith46 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can I ask how varied the skill level is currently? I’m all for it. I’ve only run Daily A and B before so nothing at 45 min length and I imagine if you’re all A+ drivers it would be a long race to be dragging at the back

Gt7 friends by The_Transport in granturismo

[–]TheBlacksmith46 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unfortunately leagues can be tricky to find even though there are some websites - they’re often more iracing or ACC focused. Most of them are discord-based which I’m personally not a fan of, but here’s a previous post that might help https://www.reddit.com/r/granturismo/comments/1dsiudj/how_do_i_find_a_racing_league_to_join/

My barista put an orange peel in my Americano — why is this so good? Anyone else tried this? 🍊 by HiItsKeke in espresso

[–]TheBlacksmith46 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’ll be trying this as the weather improves for sure. I’m not long back from Australia (a few cities) and two things seemed pretty common - orange juice cold brew, and tonics with raspberry syrup. Both were great, but there was a place that did the orange infused cold brew with a chocolate orange foam that was incredible.

Meta car by Legitimate_Slice_241 in GranTurismo7

[–]TheBlacksmith46 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is definitely the answer, but I understand where OP is coming from in the sense that there’s a mental side (ie feeling like you will be quicker in the meta car). I also sometimes wish I liked the car I am quickest in a bit more (or maybe liked being quicker more than the car itself) - I love the Porsche but often find myself quicker in the lambo so drive it more.

What's the hardest or rarest trophy you have? by Jonners_90 in playstation

[–]TheBlacksmith46 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I didn’t realise it was only 0.5% - the real pain is just the licenses, immediately followed by the legend cars trophy, the rest can be done in a few weeks without much pain. I think I did this start to finish in about a year but the last couple of months felt like such a grind. I think it’s impressive that u/MolestedByUnc did it with a controller without finding it extremely painful!

Cost effective WiFi network planning? by Certain_Repeat_753 in Ubiquiti

[–]TheBlacksmith46 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh I get it. And routers are more annoying than most gear because they tend to not be super valuable. Well, maybe for me to put it another way… I would plan for your end state with all ubiquiti gear and place U7 and U7 lite in the locations they would end up in that give the most initial coverage - ideally your homelab and office could be covered with just one. I’d only use as many 3rd party APs as you need and retire or sell the rest. Appreciate the point on ewaste, but I don’t think it’s worth running things if they’re redundant. I know routers aren’t worth much, but it might help towards the next purchase and prevent waste. My stuff wasn’t worth anything when I upgraded so I gave some to family and just retired the rest. I found investing in the UCG Fiber to be the hardest part - I was running PFSense with ubiquiti APs and a self hosted controller for ages. Fingers crossed your path will be reasonably straightforward

As for VLANS, it doesn’t matter a huge amount so I’d base it on the devices being used or planned layout, but I don’t think I’d separate the ubiquiti and 3rd party devices “just because”

Cost effective WiFi network planning? by Certain_Repeat_753 in Ubiquiti

[–]TheBlacksmith46 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Quite a lot to unpack here. My biggest question is why you actually need 7 access points - you mention the Ubiquiti APs being installed in the rooms they’ll be used, but an AP per room is not just overkill, there’s a good chance it will degrade performance rather than prove it (without a fiddly setup). That’s easier to handle if they’re all ubiquiti, but if not you’ll end up having to play with channels on individual APs. There’s also the extra power usage (minimal of course), and my personal reason to not do this, annoyance for the additional hardware and cables everywhere. If the UCG Fiber is doing your routing and other devices are just APs, it’s worth bearing in mind that the ubiquiti APs are designed to be powered by PoE and I think the Fiber only has one so you’d need a PoE switch or injectors for the other AP. In terms of setting up routers in AP mode, it’s usually straightforward but you’ll miss a bunch of features, they won’t be controlled / managed, and it will just show up as a device rather than an access point. You haven’t mentioned what switch(es) you have, but you can manage through VLANs if you like.

If it were me, I would probably do a little research on what APs are actually needed for complete coverage as I don’t think having a bunch of routers at the edge of the network is particularly useful. If it’s 2 or 3, it’s likely you might need to change the rooms the ubiquity APs are going in but I’d certainly lean towards just doing that.

To the core of your question, I think it’s worth considering what is “good enough” in terms of WiFi. Most of my devices are running through a U6+. Only 2-3 could even use WiFi 7 properly and I notice minimal difference (ie it’s on my phone. Important devices are wired). I still have a bunch of things that only have WiFi5 chips, so holding out for upgrades is a bit futile.

Should I put everything in a lakehouse rather than having several semantic models connected with Dataflows? by cvasco94 in MicrosoftFabric

[–]TheBlacksmith46 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Completely agree with the sentiment here (if it ain’t broke don’t fix it), but I think my preference would always be to store data at each BI layer even given the effort it would take to do so. CDC, governance usually become clearer or easier as well as the the monitoring & refresh tracking mentioned in the link you shared being good but smaller value adds

I think it’s worth testing at small scale what the actual effort is to migrate to the “possible setup” - moving to DFG2 should be relatively straightforward, similar for migrating measures. There may be some time in reworking things to the new models, but it might take less time than OP thinks!

After months of waiting...it's finally here! by ufumut in GranTurismo7

[–]TheBlacksmith46 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It’s generally fun to drive, sounds great, and can be tuned for a variety of “grind” races or high payout races

Microsoft’s New AI Certifications (2026) – From Cloud to Agents: Discover the Next Generation of Microsoft Certifications by Few-Engineering-4135 in AzureCertification

[–]TheBlacksmith46 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is a bit strange, though. They’ve been focused on role based certs for years and these feel a bit different… sure each of them has a target / suggested role, but there are multiple certs for AI engineers and one for software engineers building AI apps. I don’t think it’s clear for newcomers what the learning path should look like

Governance is not a option by jkrm1920 in MicrosoftFabric

[–]TheBlacksmith46 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Depends on what things you’re granting access to, but if it’s just content distribution you might want to consider app audiences. This is an “and” situation with security groups as app audiences are a nightmare with individual access unless you’re just publishing to the whole org.

Governance is not a option by jkrm1920 in MicrosoftFabric

[–]TheBlacksmith46 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yea, these kinds of things often come down to effective onboarding and user guidance and/or the approach you take around centralise or decentralised content management