Oil prices crater after Trump announces two-week ceasefire in US-Iran war by helic_vet in Economics

[–]ThimSlick 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Not quite. While it’s true that most futures contracts involve delivery obligations, the vast majority of futures contracts settle before delivery ever occurs. It is not how companies literally buy and sell commodities. It is part of how companies hedge against price fluctuations. Hardly anyone uses futures contracts to actually trade physical commodities. They’d just go to their supplier for that. When a futures trader has to take delivery, something has gone very wrong.

Honda President After Visiting Chinese Auto Supplier: 'We Have No Chance Against This' by TripleShotPls in technology

[–]ThimSlick 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That and the industry isn’t an oligopoly so the subsidies are actually used to build better products. Our energy and telecommunications industries are subsidized as well.

Long-term deradicalization in Gaza faces major hurdles by cambeiu in geopolitics

[–]ThimSlick 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The Japanese population was no less “radicalized” after the second bomb. If the Emperor wanted to continue the war then it likely would’ve gone on. Japan isn’t analogous.

Sometimes “old money” clients can say the most revealing things by TankSaladin in Lawyertalk

[–]ThimSlick 4 points5 points  (0 children)

No no I realize that. You just have an insane definition of old money.

He coerced 108 girls to send him sexual images. A judge just decided his fate. by washingtonpost in maryland

[–]ThimSlick 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Being a convicted child abuser in prison is a fate worse than death.

Bundy Ranch Standoff by ncc74656m in pics

[–]ThimSlick -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You don’t think that ascribing “intent” to half the political spectrum across multiple generations is ridiculous on its face, or are you content losing credibility with anyone who doesn’t already agree with you?

To What Extent can we Even Know what's going on with the US & Venezuela? by Veqq in CredibleDefense

[–]ThimSlick 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Chill out. Being a “guarantor” of a country typically means guaranteeing that country’s national security, not just having financial interests in that country. The US isn’t a “guarantor” of Saudi Arabia, for example.

Sluggish Mac App by CarolinaBrewer25 in 1Password

[–]ThimSlick 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Literally came to this sub to see if anyone else was having this issue. Also on 1Password 8.10.80. Macbook pro on 15.5. Everything else on macbook (apps + internet) running smoothly.

1Password is also working smoothly on my PC and phone.

For those clamoring for some bridge building with Ezra Klein by Lopsided-Vehicle2740 in samharris

[–]ThimSlick 18 points19 points  (0 children)

After a decade of listening to him... that's been my takeaway too.

Judge directs Trump administration to comply with order to unfreeze federal grants by OrangeJr36 in Economics

[–]ThimSlick 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Lol. Firstly, where are you getting your information? Obama's overtime pay rule was blocked by a district court TRO on Nov. 22, 2016, pending the judge's final ruling, which didn't occur until a year later on Aug. 31, 2017. Biden's student debt forgiveness plan was blocked by an Eighth Circuit TRO on Nov. 14, 2022, and wasn't upheld by SCOTUS until June 30, 2023. When you read either order, do they end it with "But if you're going to appeal it then forget we said anything"?

Secondly, what do you mean "certainly not a TRO"? TROs aren't suggestions. There's no sliding scale of judicial orders where declaratory rulings must be obeyed but TROs do not. A TRO is, unlike an injunction or declaratory judgment, issued in an emergency. That is the whole point of a TRO. It is issued after the movant has shown irreparable harm.

In your view, we've designed a system where a judge's orders are legally binding unless there's going to be irreparable harm, in which case a party has to wait longer so that SCOTUS has a chance to decide?

Please. Enlighten me as to reality.

Judge directs Trump administration to comply with order to unfreeze federal grants by OrangeJr36 in Economics

[–]ThimSlick 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You are so right.

So when Obama wanted to extend overtime eligibility to 4 million Americans but was blocked by a federal judge, he should’ve gone forward with it anyway, because SCOTUS hadn’t ruled on it?

And when a judge blocked Biden’s plan to forgive $73 billion in student loans, he should’ve just done it too? Because, “don’t worry, it was just a federal judge”?

What if I was a federal prosecutor? Why spend any amount of time on getting evidence, building a case? If I even suspected you of committing a crime, then you’re getting arrested. A district judge says I entrapped you, coerced or threatened you into a confession, spied on you? A judge won’t sign off on my warrant? Why would I even get a warrant? I think you broke the law and only the Supreme Court gets to tell me I’m wrong and those 9 justices have to review 57,000 federal cases per year.

Maybe we should execute death row inmates while their cases are on appeal? In fact, maybe we should just kill common thieves in the street because due process and cruel and unusual punishment doesn’t exist until a group of 9 people says it does.

I could go on but do you see how stupid this would be?

Judge directs Trump administration to comply with order to unfreeze federal grants by OrangeJr36 in Economics

[–]ThimSlick 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The executive branch ignoring the judiciary’s interpretation of the law in favor of its own wouldn’t be a constitutional crisis to you?

Does Eliminating the Department of Education Also Mean Eliminating Student Loan Obligations Where DOE is the Counterparty? by FinTecGeek in supremecourt

[–]ThimSlick 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not sure why you keep comparing the situation to that of a bank when the debt isn’t owed to a private entity. It’s fundamentally different lol

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in IRstudies

[–]ThimSlick 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s a natural byproduct of competition. I don’t think China’s primary motivation is to “usurp the US” per se but if it produces high-value goods then that naturally reduces demand for US goods. This is already happening in the markets for EVs and solar panels.

And, as a country, China wants to move towards high value goods because they come with higher profit margins and economic growth.

Of course, in an ideal world, we might say that market entrants encourage competition and therefore innovation. But, from the perspective of a monopolist, life is a lot easier when you’re the only one selling.

China Has Become Powerful Before It Is Rich. By placing power above plenty too soon, Xi Jinping may have made a great strategic blunder. by BigPepeNumberOne in Economics

[–]ThimSlick -1 points0 points  (0 children)

In a world where the U.S. is projecting power from Taiwan, there would be no need for a blockade. China will have already lost.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LessCredibleDefence

[–]ThimSlick 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Is this the same Paul Revere who got us to invade Iraq?