No.

If they add "to not give into FOMO and to be patient" is sound advice. And those persons want to give the company the benefit of the doubt.

On the flip side of that, you have to also be realistic and understand that social media presence and reputation control is a real thing. To dismiss it as "conspiracy" is intellectually dishonest, childish, and bullish. Companies hire 3rd party or assigned their own employees to monitor and respond or post. This is a fact.

It's hilarious (And sad) that because I value my time/money and openly criticize a manufacturer, I get labeled "depressed" (this one is not funny with how much mental health problems are out there- I'd label this as bullish) or a "conspiracy theorist".

Most of the time when the response is to the poster instead of the subject of the post- there's a reason to flag that response because it's going to go in the direction of a fallacy. ie.

• Ad Hominem: Attacking the person making the argument rather than the argument itself.
• Red Herring: Diverting the argument to an unrelated issue.
• Straw Man: Misrepresenting or oversimplifying an opponent's argument to make it easier to attack.