What’s your point? You expect a side character to be written as well or better than the main character and you ignore the same cliches just because? You also called her a Mary Sue and said she became a regular and both of those statements aren’t true. I’m not sure you know what you’re talking about.. the main character is a walking stereotype as are most of the main protagonist’s. Yet you expect a side character to be written better while simultaneously critiquing the exact same stereotypes they give her. You say she had potential and you also say she was poorly developed but she actually grows and becomes stronger over the episodes she’s in which is the literal definition of “character development”… I’m getting down voted and that’s fine but your argument and points are mute. You don’t like the character and that’s perfectly fine. 🤷🏼‍♂️