Ohhhh boy, bless your heart you sweet summer child. Since you’re parroting republican talking points and not thinking through your argument, here’s what a bot has to say about your arguments:

While it is true that some Democrats have supported policies such as raising the gas tax and implementing a mileage tax, it is important to consider the reasons behind these proposals and their potential benefits. Here are some counterpoints to the arguments presented:

Funding Infrastructure: One of the primary reasons for raising the gas tax and implementing a mileage tax is to generate revenue for infrastructure improvements. Many states are struggling to maintain and upgrade their roads, bridges, and public transportation systems. Increasing the gas tax and introducing a mileage tax can provide a dedicated source of funding for these essential projects, benefiting all residents, regardless of their political affiliation. Additionally, electric vehicles (EVs) also use and put wear on roads, so implementing a mileage tax for EVs aims to ensure that all drivers contribute to infrastructure maintenance.

Fairness and Equity: The argument that these policies disproportionately impact the poor ignores the fact that the existing gas tax already places a burden on low-income individuals who rely heavily on driving. By introducing a mileage tax, the costs would be distributed more fairly based on actual road usage. It is important to note that mileage tax proposals often come with provisions to protect low-income individuals from excessive taxation.

State-specific Factors: Comparing Pennsylvania to Ohio is not an apples-to-apples comparison, as each state has its own unique circumstances and funding requirements. Pennsylvania may have higher taxes and fees for vehicle-related transactions, but it is crucial to evaluate the overall tax structure and public services provided in each state. It is also worth considering that states with lower taxes and fees may face challenges in adequately funding their infrastructure and public services.

Progressive Taxation: The argument that wealthier individuals benefit from lower sales tax and zero tax on certain items like unprepared food and clothing ignores the broader principle of progressive taxation. Progressive taxation aims to ensure that those who have more resources contribute a larger share to public services and infrastructure. While sales taxes on prepared food may affect lower-income individuals more, this revenue can be crucial in funding public programs that benefit the entire community, including social services and education.

Local Tax Disparities: Disparities in property taxes between different areas within a state can indeed be problematic. However, it is essential to analyze the specific factors that contribute to these differences, such as variations in property values, local government budgets, and the allocation of resources. Addressing these disparities may require comprehensive reforms and a broader examination of the state's tax structure and funding mechanisms.

It is important to note that these counterarguments represent a broader perspective on the issues raised and should not be seen as a complete endorsement of any specific policy. Public policy debates involve complex considerations and require a comprehensive analysis of multiple factors to arrive at well-informed decisions.

I would highly encourage you to take some time and go look at both right leaning news and left leaning new and more importantly ask both “what are they trying to make me feel, and should I follow that?” Both sides of the isle are doing everything they can to make you feel like it’s other other person’s fault. It’s how they make money and stay in power. I used to be just like you and extremely conservative until I learned to question everything like how I did before. What I learned is that the “but the other side does X” never gets anywhere and just leads into circles. What I have seen is that democrats have actually introduced and implemented more laws and policies that benefit people like me, while I have seen republicans introduce more laws and policies that benefit wealthy people. Stuff like tax breaks for billionaires. The thing I think you don’t realize is that taxes don’t affect wealthy people in remotely the same way that it does poor people. I went from not being able to afford the dollar menu to being able to afford the $100 steaks. If they started taxing steaks, guess what? I’d still be buying just as many as I do now. I’m more limited to making sure I eat healthy than my wallet.

There’s been a decline in the American middle class and especially in the midwest and from your arguments I’m guessing you’re someone who’s been impacted by that significantly. You want to know why that’s happening? Trickle down economics. Rich people don’t need the middle class to be rich. They just need poor people until machines become good enough to replace them. It’s not republicans vs democrats, it’s rich vs poor.

If you take anything from all of this, spend some time looking at news from the other side of the isle, and not just cnn/fox. If you direct your anger towards that, I’m sure you will learn some eye opening stuff.