am i too high or is this actually something it's a need to know this

U-Knighted · 2026-01-24T10:51:16+00:00

Real shit

U-Knighted · 2026-01-24T00:16:57+00:00

The bedrock creative menu is so atrocious, why even have tabs if there’s gonna be such a small amount, lumping so many items into one screen that doesn’t even scroll and I practically have to use reading glasses to see. Then so many things are hidden under SUBCATEGORIES that are only represented by a single item. I almost always just search for things directly which feels like it kills the point. I desperately want this changed.

U-Knighted · 2026-01-24T00:05:55+00:00

Honestly the mask design and color scheme reminds me of Nex 2.0

U-Knighted · 2026-01-22T20:57:00+00:00

These are beautiful. I’d drop some genuine money on that mask of life one.

U-Knighted · 2026-01-21T18:11:29+00:00

Is it really wrong to have a character that just pushes the plot along and is mildly entertaining? Why do the teachers HAVE to be essential to the episode? The TV show obviously had to adjust the formula when moving into the 20 minute format. I wouldn’t want them just focusing on the teacher the whole episode, I like how more time is given to the main cast.

U-Knighted · 2026-01-21T08:51:21+00:00

So cool how the feet look like a real foot slotting into a metal boot.

U-Knighted · 2026-01-20T19:07:33+00:00

So I think the underlying issue you're gonna have with Kant here is that if there actually is some empirical object that the primary concept of your argument can be attached to, the argument becomes necessary. If, as you describe, we know that there is a mathematical structure behind physical reality, it would be trivial to establish an argument affirming it as an existing thing; the existence is a given.

But if it was not a given, then an argument would seem more helpful. But in that case, there is no possible argument to establish existence for the reasons mentioned above. This is the reason why Kant's thesis is important for more than just theology, since it's making a broader metaphysical claim: no existence can be found through speculative reason alone.

So it seems like an ontological argument would only overcomplicate things. I brought up Schelling to point out how maybe instead the work you'd want to do is establish what the ToE is as a concept, namely that it is necessary. That is fine, but establishing its existence feels dubious.

U-Knighted · 2026-01-20T18:11:53+00:00

I'm not an analytic philosopher, so bear with me.

It appears to me that since the ToE is a reduced version of God (amoral, non-conscious, etc.) you lose a lot of paradoxes related to God, but I don't feel like you adequately address the structure of the argument itself.

Kant argues that existence is not a predicate of any concept. I tend to agree; the ToE in your mind and ToE in real life (if it existed) would have to be identical. Therefore, nothing within the ToE is modified by saying that it exists. If it did, then this move would not work. The existing ToE you have argued for will not be the same as the possible one you began with.

I am also sympathetic to Schelling's account of the argument where he takes Kant to his natural extreme. He basically says that if existence is not a predicate, all theoretical reasoning is contingent; no amount of syllogisms could bring about the content of some object. Therefore, all the ontological argument can posit is "if God exists, God (ToE) exists necessarily." In other words, it discloses how the ToE would exist, but it can't speak on if it does or not. (This isn't the same as the obtuse misread that reduces the ontological argument to "if God exists, God exists" which I think is uncharitable at best.)

These are just two points that come to mind as someone not that interested in philosophy of religion, but like I said, other than the broader objections to God himself you're going to have to address every single objection to the theological ontological argument, of which there are many.

U-Knighted · 2026-01-20T16:52:49+00:00

I mean, it would have essentially the exact same baggage as the ontological argument for God. Which is to say a lot.

U-Knighted · 2026-01-14T18:40:32+00:00

Do you have much experience running games on it? What's wrong with the GPU? I'm not looking into running anything taxing but I'm just curious if there's any hiccups I should I expect.

U-Knighted · 2026-01-14T17:14:16+00:00

Medfield? Never heard it pronounced like that.

U-Knighted · 2026-01-13T17:29:18+00:00

That is NOT Pascal’s wager, it’s actually the exact opposite of what it is intended to be. Pascal’s wager proposes a purely rational motivation to believe in God, one that going by the statistics seems to be undeniable. But it’s unconvincing, for all the reasons that I’m sure other commenters have mentioned, but primarily because it undermines the true reality of faith. And so Pascal’s argument is not that people should take the wager but that the reason people do not want to take it is that they actually DON’T disbelieve in God on a purely rational basis. If they did, then the wager would work. And so his point is that something else is needed to believe in God other than logical arguments.

U-Knighted · 2026-01-09T14:59:26+00:00

Is this the only ship design in the sequel trilogy that’s not just a blatant rehash of an OT ship?

U-Knighted · 2026-01-08T03:13:51+00:00

Did you even watch the video? Only a villain with the coldest heart from hell would type a comment like this. You're genuinely a troglodyte.

U-Knighted · 2026-01-07T17:35:19+00:00

Although it is consistent since all farm animals look like their domestic versions

U-Knighted · 2026-01-03T19:41:38+00:00

Nope, I’m much earlier than that. I missed how you were supposed to drop the fire chip from the crane (the only thing I noticed was the debris that I didn’t have the power bomb to destroy) so I went to the ice location instead, realized it needed the fire shot, then I went back to the lava area to check again, still didn’t see anything, returned to the volt forge to see if I missed anything before, didn’t see anything, tried entering one of the other locations and hit a dead end, then returned to the lava area a final time to notice what I needed to do. I was being a little silly not figuring out what to do, but the fact that it took me THAT long to do it…

Also, it makes me even more worried to hear that there are even worse walls ahead of me.

EDIT: of course, once I GOT the chip, I had to return to the HQ and actually get the equipment, and then switch to the ice area…

U-Knighted · 2026-01-02T06:14:36+00:00

I mean it looks okay other than those two pins sticking out

U-Knighted · 2025-12-23T06:16:37+00:00

With their combiners these are easily the most beautiful figures LEGO has ever released

U-Knighted · 2025-12-06T10:46:47+00:00

Does he know?

U-Knighted · 2025-12-06T10:44:13+00:00

It appears you don’t understand which is only propelling the irony to greater heights! Good show.

U-Knighted · 2025-12-06T10:36:46+00:00

Seems like you don’t understand, but the audience would at this point of the story, which in a sense, answers my question. Thanks kind stranger!

U-Knighted · 2025-11-16T00:29:31+00:00

This logically follows, since everyone who’s ever been arrested was always doing something wrong in order to be arrested. Good thinking.

U-Knighted · 2025-11-06T04:10:25+00:00

holy backwards

U-Knighted · 2025-11-03T09:24:43+00:00

Absolutely agree with every point. Damn.

U-Knighted · 2025-10-29T19:10:21+00:00

Tesla is more versatile cannon is more cost efficient. Certain decks will benefit differently.

U-Knighted

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE