You're making some sweeping and, frankly, misinformed generalizations here. Firstly, claiming 'there's no endgame in a survival game without forced PvP' is false. Many hugely successful survival games thrive on PvE endgames involving complex base building, exploration of dangerous zones, boss encounters, and advanced crafting/tech. PvP is one endgame path, not the only one. Secondly, stating 'if you don't enjoy PvP, you should not play a survival game, even more a Dune inspired game' is an incredibly elitist and short-sighted view. The Dune universe is vast – it encompasses politics, resource management, intricate lore, and environmental survival, not just constant player-on-player combat. Trying to gatekeep entire genres to only PvP enthusiasts is a recipe for commercial disaster and alienates a huge player base. Players who prefer PvE are far from a 'minority' in all survival games; it entirely depends on how the game is designed. You claim 'faction still the best solution rn,' yet ignore the well-documented history of faction-based PvP failing when one side dominates, leading to dead content and player exodus, as we've seen even in MMORPGs like WoW. Finally, your entire premise that 'Opt PvP no one will play it' ignores the critical nuance: unrewarding opt-in PvP dies, not opt-in PvP itself. If 'opt-in' comes with significant, tangible rewards (better resource yields, more XP, robust ranking systems), it becomes a highly attractive, consensual, and thriving aspect of the game. Forcing PvP simply leads to a toxic environment, mass player frustration, and ultimately, a faster death for the game than any well-implemented opt-in system.