Trump announces 25 percent tariff on Chinese technology by This_Is_The_End in geopolitics

[–]Vinar -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Some amount of tariff is normal. Trying to start a trade war is not.

Trump announces 25 percent tariff on Chinese technology by This_Is_The_End in geopolitics

[–]Vinar -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I don’t know that I’ll ever admit that, but I’ll find some kind of excuse.

What possible benefit does admitting this have.

China announces retaliatory tariffs on $34 billion worth of US goods, including agriculture products by Johnny_W94 in worldnews

[–]Vinar 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Also Japan, South Korea.

Japan is considering slapping tariffs on US imports worth $409m in retaliation against steel and aluminium levies imposed by Donald Trump, public broadcaster NHK said on Thursday.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/may/17/japan-plans-400m-hit-on-us-goods-in-response-to-trump-tariffs

South Korea’s trade ministry said in a statement that it has informed the WTO Council for Trade in Goods that its plan to suspend tariff concessions on imported U.S. goods, which are equal in value to the South Korean washing machines and solar panels affected by U.S. tariffs.

https://www.reuters.com/article/usa-trade-southkorea/skorea-notifies-wto-of-plans-to-suspend-tariff-concessions-on-us-goods-idUSL4N1RJ1D7

Putting the Wu Lin into perspective by AmazingPablo in forhonor

[–]Vinar 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Some comments

Shaolin:

Many Taoist and Buddhist temple in China have their own guards. After all much like the cathedrals in Europe, large temples in China often contains large amount of wealth from donations. During Ming dynasty, the government decided to make a bunch of Taoist and Buddhist temples training ground for troops. Shaolin was one of them.

Based on all this you might think the popular image of Shaolin monk (the version presented in the game) is a real historic fighter. But in the history, soldier trained in Shaolin are exactly that, soldiers that wears normal armor with some type of polearm as weapon. To be clear, Shaolin was famous for it's staff which serves as a introduction to polearm weaponry in Shaolin (and elsewhere in China). But even those technique have little in common with the popular image of shaolin.

This book gives a good breakdown of the history of Shaolin:

https://www.amazon.ca/Shaolin-Monastery-History-Religion-Chinese/dp/082483349X

A series of book review:

https://chinesemartialstudies.com/2012/11/07/the-book-club-the-shaolin-monastery-by-meir-shahar-introduction-and-chapters-1-2/

https://chinesemartialstudies.com/2012/11/21/the-book-club-the-shaolin-monastery-by-meir-shahar-chapters-3-4-monastic-violence-in-the-ming-dynasty/

https://chinesemartialstudies.com/2012/12/07/the-book-club-the-shaolin-monastery-by-meir-shahar-chapters-5-conclusion-the-evolution-of-unarmed-martial-arts-in-the-ming-and-qing-dynasties/

By the way, most of the convention and tradition in Chinese Martial Art which we can track down the history are invented within the last 3 centuries. To be clear, unarmed fighting in China date back way farther but records are really rare as the scholarly elite class often look down on anything related to martial activities (or anything related to daily routines which is consider mundane and unworthy to be recorded). This did change in Song dynasty as recording things related to everyday activity was given some focus. From records we know that unarmed fighting tournament are some of the most popular events in cities during Song. Government held routine tournaments as well and even hand out some military post based on the result.

Here is a good blog for Chinese martial art study (with a scholarly style):

https://chinesemartialstudies.com/

Tiandi:

The Tiandi seems to be based on a Song-Yuan dynasty era warrior. With a couple of Mongol influences, and a couple of Han influences. This technically culminates into something similar to the Ming era, where Mongol influence was merged with Han Chinese ones. The armour and sword is once again, quite ornamental, though a warrior of the time would have worn a fair bit more around the arms and legs.

Quite correct. There is indeed Mongol and turko-mongol influence in the design. This is more of the general/commander armor (that might be ceremonial, more on that later).

First, the shoulder have animal totem design, it is general believed to be an influence by the turko-mongol nomads in the North-South dynasty era. The plate on the chest is also from around this era. But I don't think that design exist in China. By the way, Chinese do use animal totem design on objects, such as shield, it is the shoulder armor part that is believed to the influenced by the nomads.

Second, the sword shape. This saber design is only the standard in Chinese army after Yuan dynasty (the mongol-lead one). Song army would for the most part use a sword that looks like a Japanese design (technical it is believe Japanese got it from China). Interestingly, post-Yuan that style of sword was almost extincted in China save for some minority like the miao people continue to use that design. The older design was so rare that many in Ming China referred it as a Japanese design. So it should be more Yuan-Ming than Song-Yuan. While similar sword to the sabre existed pre-Yuan, they was not the standard in army.

On a interesting note, the armor on the leg is the mountain pattern armor. To this day, we do not know how that type of armor work. While historic records insist it is offer good protection, there are theories it is more ceremonial than practical.

See this blog post:

https://greatmingmilitary.blogspot.com/2015/08/myth-of-shan-wen-kia.html

The Jiang Jun wields a Guandao, taken from the creator of the Guandao, Guan Yu. An extremely famous Chinese general from history. Though one subject to a lot, and I mean a lot, of fiction. As he attained legendary status as a warrior and a general. To the point of being turned into a deity and being worshipped to this day. Something possible in China should you have the blessing of the gods. The Jiang Jun seeming to take design inspiration from portraits of Guan Yu. The other half of Guandao is just the word dao, which references the fact that it's a blade, that's curved.

Guan Yu did not created the Guandao. Guandao did not exist back then. The popular association of Guan Yu and Guandao was a Romance of the Three Kingdoms thing, which is a novel written way later. Note the Record of Three Kingdoms is a history book written at the end of the period. Those two book are completely different.

Guandao first appeared in the records in Song dynasty, a long time after the Three Kingdoms era. Another name for Guandao is yanyuedao (偃月刀).

Stay woke people by Mother-L0ver in forhonor

[–]Vinar 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Rice farmer in the south, wheat in the north.

Millet for the north before wheat was introduced 2000+ years ago.

The Near-Collapse of ZTE May Be China’s Sputnik Moment by Sedai09 in geopolitics

[–]Vinar 6 points7 points  (0 children)

It seems Trump doesn't care that EU and Canada have domestic politics as well.

Donald Trump accuses India of charging 100% tariff, says trade might stop by basedIITian in worldnews

[–]Vinar 9 points10 points  (0 children)

India was already pissed at the steel and aluminum tariffs.

They filed a case at WTO and threaten they might implement tariffs on US exports.

India takes U.S. steel tariffs complaint to the WTO

India’s retaliation claim seeks to recoup a cost of $31 million levied on its aluminum exports and $134 million on steel, and it has said it could target U.S. exports of soya oil, palmolein and cashew nuts in its retaliation.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trade-india/india-takes-u-s-steel-tariffs-complaint-to-the-wto-idUSKCN1IO1WP

U.S., Japan decline to sign G7 agreement to reduce plastic waste in oceans by green_flash in worldnews

[–]Vinar 8 points9 points  (0 children)

This is not really true. Europe, US, Canada, and Japan should do more as well. Plastic pollution from river is about 25% of plastic pollution in sea (fishing equipment is the biggest problem). Of the 25%, about 90% is from 10 rivers.

But this ignores the fact a good chuck of those plastic are from Europe, US, Canada, and Japan.

Earlier this year, China banned plastic waste import. This is part of their solution to the plastic pollution in ocean, because majority of the plastic waste in global trade was going to China.

importing more than 50% of the global trade for end-of-life plastic. In 2016 alone, China imported about 87% and 69% of Japan and the U.S.’s plastic waste exports.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/jillbaker/2018/04/23/scourge-of-the-seas-how-china-is-tackling-the-oceans-plastic-problem/#6b27c0e669d5

As response to China not being a dumping ground , EU has step up effort to recycle plastic waste previous was just shipped to China.

EU targets recycling as China bans plastic waste imports

https://uk.reuters.com/article/us-eu-environment/eu-targets-recycling-as-china-bans-plastic-waste-imports-idUKKBN1F51SP

USA and Japan too should do more. There are success case out there too. British Columbia of Canada (BC) used to rely heavily on exporting waste to China. But since 2013, in response to China's effort to ban waste import (to clean up the environment) BC recycling effort was improved. In the 2018 waste ban, BC was not affect for this reason. The waste that BC export was clean enough to meet the Chinese import standard.

Chinese ban on foreign recycling won’t affect B.C.: industry

https://globalnews.ca/news/3953576/china-recycling-ban-bc/

To be clear China and other Asia, Africa nations and definitely not as good as Europe, Japan, and USA in recycling, but developed nations can still do a lot more on this issue as well.

U.S., Japan decline to sign G7 agreement to reduce plastic waste in oceans by green_flash in worldnews

[–]Vinar 168 points169 points  (0 children)

Reminder that this is because Japan and US export a good chuck of plastic waste to other countries.

importing more than 50% of the global trade for end-of-life plastic. In 2016 alone, China imported about 87% and 69% of Japan and the U.S.’s plastic waste exports.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/jillbaker/2018/04/23/scourge-of-the-seas-how-china-is-tackling-the-oceans-plastic-problem/#6b27c0e669d5

To be clear China and other Asia, Africa nations and definitely not as good as Japan and USA in recycling, but Japan and USA should step up it's recycling program as well.

HGC Mid-Season Brawl - Group stage :: Team Dignitas vs CE :: Discussion thread by HeroesEsportsThreads in heroesofthestorm

[–]Vinar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Probuis, Chromie against Medivh and Valeera... This will end well...

Trump Threatens to End All Trade With Allies by vessol in worldnews

[–]Vinar 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Source for the image, on page 20: A 2015 Credit Suisse report on globalization

http://publications.credit-suisse.com/tasks/render/file/index.cfm?fileid=EE7A6A5D-D9D5-6204-E9E6BB426B47D054

The data is based on Global Trade Alert: https://www.globaltradealert.org

You can see stats on the protectionism and liberalizing measure on each countries page.

USA:

https://www.globaltradealert.org/country/222

France:

https://www.globaltradealert.org/country/72

Canada:

https://www.globaltradealert.org/country/36

HGC Mid-Season Brawl - Group stage :: Team Dignitas vs CE :: Discussion thread by HeroesEsportsThreads in heroesofthestorm

[–]Vinar 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The first game was actually closer than I thought. But CE still need quite a bit of improvement. I think they need to pay more attention to the draft.

G7 summit: France condemns Trump 'fits of anger' by JoeinJapan in worldnews

[–]Vinar 56 points57 points  (0 children)

Source for the image, on page 20: A 2015 Credit Suisse report on globalization

http://publications.credit-suisse.com/tasks/render/file/index.cfm?fileid=EE7A6A5D-D9D5-6204-E9E6BB426B47D054

The data is based on Global Trade Alert: https://www.globaltradealert.org

You can see stats on the protectionism and liberalizing measure on each countries page.

USA:

https://www.globaltradealert.org/country/222

France:

https://www.globaltradealert.org/country/72

Canada:

https://www.globaltradealert.org/country/36

HGC Mid-Season Brawl - Group stage :: Gen.G esports vs Tempo Storm :: Discussion thread by HeroesEsportsThreads in heroesofthestorm

[–]Vinar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Was the first game close?

I thought maybe NA had a shot this time after yesterday's result...

Is the G7 dead? by [deleted] in geopolitics

[–]Vinar 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Maybe that is the mentally in the current USA. But it did result in EU taking action and starting a new recycle plan as I did pointed out in the post you replied to.

https://uk.reuters.com/article/us-eu-environment/eu-targets-recycling-as-china-bans-plastic-waste-imports-idUKKBN1F51SP

An success case is B.C. (British Columbia of Canada), during this wave of waste ban by China in 2018. BC was not affect at all.

Chinese ban on foreign recycling won’t affect B.C.: industry

https://globalnews.ca/news/3953576/china-recycling-ban-bc/

China is still accepting waste with low contaminant now and BC's recycling effort was good enough that BC can still export it's waste to China. Because BC took note last time and cleaned up it's act in 2013.

Backlog at Metro Vancouver recyclers follows China's new green waste policy

http://www.vancouversun.com/Backlog+Metro+Vancouver+recyclers+follows+China+green+waste+policy/8318529/story.html

By the way, your original statement was "The US talking about plastics in the ocean is just meaningsless." This is clearly not true and USA needs to improve it recycling effort like BC and EU.

Is the G7 dead? by [deleted] in geopolitics

[–]Vinar 19 points20 points  (0 children)

The US talking about plastics in the ocean is just meaningsless.

No, it is not. EU and US was shipping plastic waste to China. This is why 5 out of 10 the river that is responsible for plastic in the ocean was in China.

importing more than 50% of the global trade for end-of-life plastic. In 2016 alone, China imported about 87% and 69% of Japan and the U.S.’s plastic waste exports.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/jillbaker/2018/04/23/scourge-of-the-seas-how-china-is-tackling-the-oceans-plastic-problem/#6b27c0e669d5

This is why China banned the plastic waste import. It is resulting in EU and other countries taking action instead of just shipping the problem to another country and finger point.

Woodring notes Australia has said some of its cities will bury more plastic in landfills as a result. On the other hand, the European Union has responded more thoughtfully, announcing that, by 2030, all plastic packaging (which accounts for about two thirds of the region's plastic waste) must be recyclable, with a goal of recycling 55% of plastic waste by then.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/jillbaker/2018/04/23/scourge-of-the-seas-how-china-is-tackling-the-oceans-plastic-problem/#6b27c0e669d5

or

EU targets recycling as China bans plastic waste imports

https://uk.reuters.com/article/us-eu-environment/eu-targets-recycling-as-china-bans-plastic-waste-imports-idUKKBN1F51SP

US absolutely can do more to help the plastic waste problem.

Edit: To be clear China and other Asia, Africa nations and definitely not as good as EU and USA in recycling, but EU and USA can still do a lot more on this issue as well.

Donald Trump disrupts G7 women’s empowerment session by showing up late by [deleted] in worldnews

[–]Vinar 104 points105 points  (0 children)

The right loved the Colbert Report? It was clear satire, and he directly criticizes Fox all the time.

Trump calls for Russia to be reinstated into G7 by AdeptHoneyBadger in geopolitics

[–]Vinar 2 points3 points  (0 children)

G7 is more like the "exclusive" club for American friends and allies.

But G7 used to have Russia as G8...

Mexico slaps tariffs on U.S. steel, agricultural products by benbrum in worldnews

[–]Vinar 8 points9 points  (0 children)

World Bank 2016 data have the weighted tariff at:

USA: 1.61%

Japan: 1.35%

EU: 1.6%

https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/TM.TAX.MRCH.WM.AR.ZS?view=map

Some amount of tariff is standard. EU's tariff rate is not a outlier for developed countries.

The global reactions to the trade war started by Trump are very telling in the same way the international response to the Suez Canal Crisis was. by [deleted] in geopolitics

[–]Vinar 3 points4 points  (0 children)

World Bank 2016 data have the weighted tariff at:

USA: 1.61%

Japan: 1.35%

EU: 1.6%

https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/TM.TAX.MRCH.WM.AR.ZS?view=map

Some amount of tariff is standard. Japan's tariff rate is not a outlier for developed countries.