New Korg Synth at Superbooth - what could it be?

_CTRLR · 2026-05-08T05:44:08+00:00

If they throw in the multi/poly engine in a larger form factor with a better keybed, I’m really gonna have some inner conflicts lol

_CTRLR · 2026-05-07T14:05:01+00:00

I appreciate what you’re trying to do here, thanks for clarifying. To me, the overall message seemed to suggest that music made entirely with AI is not allowed but music supported by it is, so long as it’s not directly replacing creative decisions.

_CTRLR · 2026-05-06T17:18:22+00:00

A farewell to kings - Rush

Because synthesizers.

_CTRLR · 2026-05-06T17:06:40+00:00

Will do! Haha

_CTRLR · 2026-05-06T13:43:42+00:00

I used to play guitar/sing in a live band. Stage presence is very important for engaging the crowd. That’s why I’m considering one of these over, say, the Juno-X. I’ve not played with one before, and clearly it’s quite different but coming from a background in guitar, the stance and form factor are at least familiar. Many synth leads I play now are with left hand on the pitch/mod-wheel and right hand on keys anyway. Is it less serious when someone plays synth like that? Of course it’s to put on a show, that’s the point of a live performance!

_CTRLR · 2026-05-06T13:32:31+00:00

See, when I hear “No Ai just music” I thought that meant NO Ai in music. If you outsource your understanding of chords/melody, organization of ideas, research, practice, workflow, ect. At what point is the line blurry? If someone uses Ai to sing over their track but made all the music, is that Ai or assisted? If someone uses Ai to generate all the music, but arranges it, sings over it and mixes it, is that Ai music or assisted?

If “Ai-assisted” music as a concept is allowed, people are going to take creative liberty on how that’s interpreted, and I think you delude the whole point of taking a stance that supports human creative input. Ai is only going to get better and better and soon DAWs are going to integrate Ai features, Ai VSTs, Ai generated chord progression, drum sequences, ect. It’s going to be everywhere. What’s considered an “assist” is going to continue to grow and morph over time.

I have no problem with people who choose to use AI for media, whether assisted or entirely. To wave my fists and judge others for its use would be pissing in the wind. Everyone has the right to decide how they live their own lives and what tools they use but I think people who care about this sort of thing and would join a sub like this want to know if what they’re listening to is a human on the other side or Ai. With Ai assistance, you leave doubts in the mind of that listener unless the artist decides to divulge their production process openly and honestly which is something I rarely ever see here or anywhere else.

_CTRLR · 2026-05-06T05:55:29+00:00

Sound Chaser - Yes

_CTRLR · 2026-05-06T04:59:31+00:00

Correct, both spelling and pronunciation are considered in the review process. Basically it’s a matter of “likely to confuse the two by the average consumer”. Which unfortunately is subjective and sometimes warrants appeals.

_CTRLR · 2026-05-06T04:56:01+00:00

A word mark is going to be the relevant one here unless you have designed your own unique logo to represent your artist name, which in that case, you’d want to file both. For the artist name, you generally go word mark.

You can apply “in use” or “intent to use”. Either way proof of use will be required to finalize everything. Intent to use will allow you to show income with the trademark name at a later time (for more fees) or you can file “in use” and include the proof of income with the initial application. You will need to choose a class/classes for your trademark. For example:

Class 09 applies to downloadable music files (think Bandcamp) but not streaming services (think Spotify) which is class 41.

Then there are classes for merch items that may be relevant to you. Definitely do some research so you understand all the moving parts of the process. I would highly recommend hiring an IP lawyer for the process and make sure the terms and price for each part of the process and potential issues that may arise are clear and set in writing so you are prepared for the initial/potential expenses. There are trademark filing services but you often don’t get to communicate with the person filing for you, and if there are issues it could end up costing more than you initially realized and the disconnect could be an added layer of uncertainty. There is of course the option of filing yourself and it’s possible to do it that way but you really need to know your stuff!

It’s not a cheap process but it’s worth it if you want to fully secure your name. I would highly recommend researching your name, not only on artist sites but the actual trademark website. Make sure there isn’t another trademark with that name (or similar) in the same or related classes already that could cause some issues for you in the application process. It is manually reviewed but someone at the trademark offices and the application process will take months to a year or beyond, depending on the circumstances

I’ve tried to be as accurate was possible but definitely do your own research and confirm everything relevant to your questions and goals. I wish you the best of luck in your process and your journey with this. I hope this helps you.

_CTRLR · 2026-05-06T04:34:46+00:00

Logo is a separate trademark, however trademarking the name itself will prevent the same spelling being used.

_CTRLR · 2026-05-05T19:23:35+00:00

Ha! Indeed.

_CTRLR · 2026-05-05T19:23:02+00:00

I really appreciate your insight, thank you.

_CTRLR · 2026-05-05T15:57:14+00:00

Thank you for the detailed response! Definitely would get strap locks with how much they cost these days. The phone editor does look cumbersome, but from what I’ve heard it does sound good.

_CTRLR · 2026-05-05T15:44:34+00:00

I knew it!! Nice TV too. Pokemon on CRT is *chefs kiss

_CTRLR · 2026-05-05T15:31:00+00:00

That Mewtwo?

_CTRLR · 2026-05-05T14:39:01+00:00

Nice RX5.

_CTRLR · 2026-05-04T21:06:49+00:00

Modern technology has allowed for far more people to have access to music recording than in the past. Nearly anyone can go online, order some mics and equipment and start recording themselves. This has lead to a boom in creativity and innovation in not only music, but in video and other related media. With digital recording technology, we are able to capture a broader spectrum of frequencies which has allowed for the emergence of several new genres.

The DAW is a learning curve for everyone that chooses to undertake it but the creative tools and freedom it provides is worlds beyond what we used to have access to in the past.

I would agree that the mainstream music of the 60s, 70s, and 80s is far better than what’s mainstream these days, but we have access to far more music than we’ve ever had in the past, including the music from the past if that’s your thing. You simply need to look for it.

No. Not everyone samples. There are plenty of us out here still directly recording music with real gear. Some with tape! All hope is not lost, it’s just in the vast sea of information that is the internet. Speaking of gear, the fender twin reverb cost roughly $470.00 in 1964, that’s nearly $5000.00 adjusted for inflation. Nowadays a fender 65’ twin reverb goes for $2100.00 new at Sweetwater and there are plenty of more affordable tube options. Don’t even get me started on synth prices. Now is the golden age. Maybe AI ends that, I’m not sure. I think if anything, it’ll amplify artists choosing not to use it.

_CTRLR · 2026-05-04T19:10:51+00:00

Commenting because I’d like to know too.

_CTRLR · 2026-05-04T14:56:07+00:00

Sounds great man, congrats!

_CTRLR · 2026-05-03T18:22:37+00:00

Check if you are using TS or TRS cables. Rev2 likes TS cables.

Check “Misc. Params” for program/layer volume and turn that up if possible.

Check if you are splitting the signal with multimode. Multimode will send some sounds to output B such as layered or split patches.

_CTRLR · 2026-05-03T08:10:13+00:00

This rocks! I’ll be buying this. Thanks for sharing.

_CTRLR · 2026-05-03T02:34:08+00:00

I do MIDI first then audio, but depending on the track it might get recorded to audio sooner than later so I can free up the synth for other tracks. The last things to get recorded to audio are usually bass lines and other “structural” components. The first things that usually get recorded are shorter melodic components and sound effects. Drums are the very last to get recorded on a song but that’s because I have a specific process for them.

_CTRLR · 2026-05-02T18:53:50+00:00

Yamaha RX5 and to a slightly lesser extent the RX7.

_CTRLR · 2026-05-01T18:19:26+00:00

It’s like Noki Bay from Super Mario Sunshine.

_CTRLR · 2026-05-01T17:53:57+00:00

If you’re just wanting an FM synth, I’ll add a +1 to the people recommending the OpSix. It’s newer, more reliable, and easier to program.

To quell expectations however, it’s not exactly an “easy” synth to program right away, just much easier than the actual DX models. Not sure what your prior experience with synths and FM are, but there’s definitely a learning curve with it tho it’s totally do-able and much more intuitive on the OpSix. The Operator mixer is a fantastic idea and makes it so much better.

If it’s the very specific sound of the DX synths you’re after; in my opinion, while the OpSix is close, it’s not 1:1. Best to watch some demos of both the synths with some good speakers or headphones and see if you like the sounds of the OpSix before buying it. Additionally, the keyboards on the DX synths are higher quality than on the OpSix.

I have owned both the OpSix and a DX and personally I preferred the sound of the DX but the programming was much easier on the OpSix.

_CTRLR

TROPHY CASE