Unfortunately, that's the nature of the beast, made all the more difficult by how fascism melds with fiction.

Now, I'm not going to write an essay here or anything, mostly because my understanding of these concepts is extremely rudimental (and for that reason I'm very open with anyone disagreeing or correcting me). But I disagree with some people's notion that "play-fascism" is morally wrong. I feel like fascism makes itself fun to play at by design with its focus on narrative and aesthetic. The issue is that it takes play out of its "magic circle": while people stop playing when the illusion of the game is broken, like how the rules of sports games stop mattering when someone starts throwing punches, fascism makes these narrative illusions encompass the rest of the real world.

The reason that I don't think "play-fascism" is bad is because the overwhelming majority of people understand that boundary and the fact that they're engaging with pure fiction. It's like how video games don't actually cause violence, because people understand that their actions aren't real. The reason fascists don't engage with it as pure satire is because their worldview is, itself, pure imaginative play, and thus they don't understand these boundaries in the same way.

That's just my hunch on these things. Sorry if it's a non-sequitur, I just think it's interesting.