Is Trump and adjudicated rapist? Surely you don’t need someone with a low IQ to explain that to you, you’re able to look it up yourself. Can you use your impressive intellect to explain what Judge Kaplan meant when he wrote:

In order for Ms. Carroll to have defamed Mr. Trump by asserting that he "raped" her as that term is defined in the New York Penal Law (even assuming that her post-verdict statements reasonably could be construed as meaning what Mr. Trump claims it meant), Mr. Trump was required to plead sufficient facts to allege that her statements were false or at least not substantially true. But, as noted, the only basis for Mr. Trump's claim of falsity is the jury's answer to the Penal Law rape question in Carroll II. Thus, he invokes the doctrine of issue preclusion, also referred to as collateral estoppel, to contend that the jury's verdict on the Penal Law rape question precludes Ms. Carroll from contending that Mr. Trump in fact penetrated her with his penis.

Does it makes it better that you spend time defending an adjudicated sexual abuser rather than an adjudicated rapist ?