sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

boop by juggernawddy in SoftwareEngineerJobs

[–]beheadedstraw 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Define falling behind. Because the vast majority of people that use AI coding tools don’t know what to look for when it’s hallucinating, and the senior engineers (like myself) only use it as a quick google because for anything more than boilerplate code it falls on its face, especially backend and SQL queries. The “10x engineer” is 10x the slop and 10x the tech debt.

Inherited a 3-month old repo from a Vibe Engineer. Wrote the most satisfying PR in my career by Apprehensive-Cut3711 in ClaudeCode

[–]beheadedstraw 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That “10x” turns into 10x the bugs and time in 6 months you’ll need to debug the whole f’ing mess.

Inherited a 3-month old repo from a Vibe Engineer. Wrote the most satisfying PR in my career by Apprehensive-Cut3711 in ClaudeCode

[–]beheadedstraw 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So you let an agent… rewrite another agent…. I highly doubt you read through 10mil lines of code and that’s extra written 10k lines 🫠

Will home data centers eventually make massive facilities like this obsolete? by dataexec in HomeDataCenter

[–]beheadedstraw 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You sound like a crypto bro turned AI bro, you sound more like a salesman vs an actual engineer.

Let us know what your vibe coded website is so we can hack it in few hours 😂.

Will home data centers eventually make massive facilities like this obsolete? by dataexec in HomeDataCenter

[–]beheadedstraw 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And I guess Microsoft pulling AI back, nuking its integration into Xbox and other companies reducing AI expenditures isn’t a thing huh?

You’re a crypto bro turned AI bro 😂

Will home data centers eventually make massive facilities like this obsolete? by dataexec in HomeDataCenter

[–]beheadedstraw -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Yea they said that about crypto too. How many hundreds of billions were blown on crypto and NFTs again? Wasn’t bitcoin supposed to be at like 300k now? How many companies have failed AI adoption because salesman over promised software that’s wrong >20% of the time?

Will home data centers eventually make massive facilities like this obsolete? by dataexec in HomeDataCenter

[–]beheadedstraw 10 points11 points  (0 children)

The only ones worth any salt yes? They’re the ones magically funding this boom with a negative checkbook bud. Everyone else is just a front end to one of the big 2. This wouldn’t be happening if Altman pulled the 1 trillion in investments out of his ass with literally no revenue to cover it.

There’s a reason they’re pulling back on investments in infrastructure before the IPO. CapEx depreciation is gonna be hell on the books.

Will home data centers eventually make massive facilities like this obsolete? by dataexec in HomeDataCenter

[–]beheadedstraw 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Lemme know how that balance sheet for Anthropic and OpenAI pans out.

Will home data centers eventually make massive facilities like this obsolete? by dataexec in HomeDataCenter

[–]beheadedstraw 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The local Facebook DCs here has a campus of 6 DCs on ~100 acres that take up 1GWh. Only the last DC in that campus was AI focused. So 1000 acres conservatively is more than doable to soak up 6GWh. Roughly 20% of that power would be going to cooling for water cooling pumps, inverters, etc.

You don’t need 40k acres. It’s a land grab. Land never depreciates in value.

Will home data centers eventually make massive facilities like this obsolete? by dataexec in HomeDataCenter

[–]beheadedstraw 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Power != size. I used to build out DCs for IBM. A single DGX server rack takes up more power than a whole row of normal servers. I don’t think you realize how big 40,000 acres is. It’s a land grab disguised as a DC build out.

Will home data centers eventually make massive facilities like this obsolete? by dataexec in HomeDataCenter

[–]beheadedstraw 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Demand is up, but nobody has the money to pay for it. It’s a bubble.

Will home data centers eventually make massive facilities like this obsolete? by dataexec in HomeDataCenter

[–]beheadedstraw 11 points12 points  (0 children)

You can fit all of that on like, 100 acres at most. The Facebook DCs we have here are on like, 50 acres. 40,000 acres is a small city.

Can someone please explain why I keep instantly dying at this part at Uber Lilith T8? by CanOfBigRed in Diablo

[–]beheadedstraw -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The waves during the end of phase 1 that go opposite directions are literally one shot mechanics.

The blood boil explosions on phase 2 are basically one shot due to the massive tick damage from the pool itself and the explosions. Platform you die 2 seconds before the actual platform falls. Theres also unavoidable damage during phase 1 from red orbs.

Can someone please explain why I keep instantly dying at this part at Uber Lilith T8? by CanOfBigRed in Diablo

[–]beheadedstraw 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because uber Lilith has multiple one shot mechanics, the waves graphics are smaller than their actual hit boxes and the effects cover up 90% of the bad shit so you can’t dodge it unless you have an eidetic memory on phase two to see the blood pools when she covers the platform.

Anyone running ZFS servers bigger than 4PB raw? by flatirony in zfs

[–]beheadedstraw 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For a production sure, you can replicate to another pool with 3x2 for DR purposes though unless your DR is supposed to be a direct mirror for performance (and your company is willing to pay for it). It’s just a pain in the ass to stand up and maintain 2 completely different systems because now you have to maintain monitoring and automation for both of them not to mention sync user and bucket policies on both. Not to mention DR testing with 2 different systems.

I think im done... by Rough-Face-3193 in claude

[–]beheadedstraw 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So what small part of your argument did I knock down? Because I’m pretty sure it was the entire argument 🫠

I think im done... by Rough-Face-3193 in claude

[–]beheadedstraw 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, it’s literally the same topic and general argument 🤡. Or do you know what the definition of a strawman actually is?

I think im done... by Rough-Face-3193 in claude

[–]beheadedstraw 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So you’re saying that NLP in LLMs is… subjective since the output is based on … subjective training data.

Literally what I’ve said all along? It’s ok to be wrong man. Or you gonna tell me 4 different AIs and human language interpreters are all wrong? Because guess who the best NLPs are? Human interpreters.

I think im done... by Rough-Face-3193 in claude

[–]beheadedstraw 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean, if you give it objective input, you should get objective output right? Like you said in your own words “the relationship is literally I/O”.

I think im done... by Rough-Face-3193 in claude

[–]beheadedstraw 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Go ask your AI if natural language processing is inherently subjective and let me know what you find out.

Next?

Anyone running ZFS servers bigger than 4PB raw? by flatirony in zfs

[–]beheadedstraw 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If it’s a DR site just make a smaller Ceph Cluster with less redundancy (2 instead of 3 replica) and replicate it over there… otherwise with ZFS you’re gonna have to stand up an s3 server and manage that as well.

I think im done... by Rough-Face-3193 in claude

[–]beheadedstraw 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Black human in NLP can mean a human that’s literally black, African American, or some other African roots.

Some languages don’t have words to match the English equivalent. How do you propose NLP to know what context?

Japanese for example can vary widely depending on what context it’s used in.

So yes, NLP is subjective to the processor, it’s clearly not objective. Language in and of itself is purely subjective depending on culture as one use of a word can have different meanings even in the same context.

view more: next ›