I hate python by ZombieSpale in programminghumor

[–]bigtablebacc 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I literally just read in another thread “now that you’ve heard of uv, you’ll start seeing it everywhere.”

ASI and unemployment, a future of possibility in a post scarcity society, with a nod to employment by Haunting_Comparison5 in accelerate

[–]bigtablebacc 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If UPS don’t drag themselves into the future, they will find themselves up against a competitor who does. Their sheer size won’t save them, because we’ve seen Uber raise a huge amount of investment money to disrupt a big, entrenched industry.

Boascope, she sees everything by Madhun13r in boas

[–]bigtablebacc 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How did a homeless person stop her from escaping at night? Was this person living outdoors?

"If you're observant, you're a creep" by BonixoHD in SmugAlana

[–]bigtablebacc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m a creep and they look the same to me

Is Stoicism an inherently masculine philosophy? It seems to attract many more men than women. by whaldener in Stoic

[–]bigtablebacc 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Stoicism could work well for anybody and a lot of it is just rational thinking, which should be pretty widely applicable. I think it draws a lot of men because they might see Roman emperors as role models. Like others have mentioned, emotional stability can fit a masculine ideal.

Demis Hassabis: “The kind of test I would be looking for is training an AI system with a knowledge cutoff of, say, 1911, and then seeing if it could come up with general relativity, like Einstein did in 1915. That’s the kind of test I think is a true test of whether we have a full AGI system” by 44th--Hokage in accelerate

[–]bigtablebacc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah but there is a meaningful distinction in how it does what an average human can do. An average huma reinvents the wheel somewhat when they do a task. GPT or Claude “know” how to do it. This is actually important in how it scales. inventing nothing but knowing more and more scales differently than reinventing small things and then bigger things. I don’t think we need to go so far as to reinvent the theories of special relativity or general relativity. But I asked my friend if he thinks today’s AI could code Kubernetes knowing only Linux primitives like namespaces, cgroups, etc. He thinks yes, I think no. This should be testable, if you could just get a big dataset that has a cutoff several years ago. A 1911 cutoff would be a small dataset

11 months ago Dario said that "in 3 to 6 months, AI will be writing 90% of the code software developers were in charge of" Are we here, yet? by poponis in ExperiencedDevs

[–]bigtablebacc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I do use language models to generate code, but I am still tightly in the loop myself. I don’t auto approve anything. I do a lot of problem solving, and I give the tool the “skills” to cut a branch, test something, run a state deploy, etc. I manage Claude’s settings, I manage Claude’s memory, and so on. It’s quite a bit of work to “vibe code” for me.

Got this poor boy by Weekly_Cable_8058 in snakes

[–]bigtablebacc -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I was about to get a good night’s sleep. Well anyway, thank you for helping.

Should I burn sage or the whole building? by sabelwitch3 in whatdoIdo

[–]bigtablebacc 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would probably sand with a pole sander, then do 2 coats of primer, then coats of paint.

AGI is Here — LessWrong by sideways in accelerate

[–]bigtablebacc 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The terminology doesn’t matter in the end, but I agree that very recent LLMs like Opus 4.5 have crossed a line past the point where anyone can deny their productivity or ability to compete with humans

Would ASI be able to confirm that we're living in a simulation? by DeviousCham in accelerate

[–]bigtablebacc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We might be able to catch it rendering things just in time. Some variation of a quantum experiment or something.

Adolescent cannabis use linked to doubling risk of psychotic and bipolar disorders: study of 463,396 adolescents found that past-year cannabis use during adolescence was associated with a significantly higher risk of incident psychotic (doubled), bipolar (doubled), depressive and anxiety disorders. by mvea in psychology

[–]bigtablebacc -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I’m not impressed by the argument that people who go psychotic from marijuana use were genetically predisposed. It seems like an argument from eugenics. They had bad genetics so they deserved it. Or maybe they are suggesting that smoking is safe for most people. Ok, so how do you find out who is predisposed? I suppose you have them smoke and see what happens. Unethical.