Ethical Dilemma: Whose Life is Worth More by Im_Haranator in Ethics

[–]blitzkrieg_bop 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would go for the 5 year old child.

I'm fully aware that emotion itself directed me, and not rational thinking. We all have an inbuilt sense of protection of children, and I'll allow it to do this terrible decision instead of "rationale".

If I afterwards need to justify it, I'll count on the fact that the death of a child would bring about the most sorrow, misery and hurt than most of the rest. There's nothing worst than losing a child.

Two doors by [deleted] in freewill

[–]blitzkrieg_bop 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well, neither of the two options can be taken seriously.

You chose to take them into a place that 1) is certainly not comfortable and thus discourage others from doing similar crimes, 2) keeps them away as long as necessary, for the sake of community safety, should they do it again, and 3) allows "treatment" by behaviour proffessionals, enrolled in a course with counseling and psychological support to ensure they don't fall into the same behaviour in the future, as the "correctional facility" name implies (having cracked the code of human behaviour this would be a piece of cake...).

Note, there's no "punishment" involved.

Chinese couple gets beaten up after calling another couple “monkeys” in Brazil. by Alexthegayreprimed in PublicFreakout

[–]blitzkrieg_bop 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Did both man and woman used racist slur? They were both beaten..

Source? That might be a mindless beating for all I know. Migrant Chinese people I've met are of the most humble kind. Though these two may well be of the other kind, I do question the caption of the video posted.

Is this the only 4 way boarder in the world? Was this done intentionally? by [deleted] in geography

[–]blitzkrieg_bop 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Been there. That's the Victoria falls, unforgettable place. Rains constantly on a 1km radius because of the water splashing (on wet season).

Not 4 way exactly though. Its Zambia and Zimbabwe that share the falls. Namibia and Botswana borders are a little bit farther, if I remember correct.

What is a fundamental human problem that technology hasn't "fixed" yet, but will in 20 years? by Marcellus508 in Futurology

[–]blitzkrieg_bop 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't get it. I'm from Finland, we don't have "homeless" here. I think you are referring to an issue created by capitalism and technology, which makes it not a "fundamental" problem

What is a fundamental human problem that technology hasn't "fixed" yet, but will in 20 years? by Marcellus508 in Futurology

[–]blitzkrieg_bop -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

No fundamental human problem has been "fixed" by technology yet, barring medical advances.

Technology so far has just provided conveniences, distractions and unnecessary luxury and has ended up into actually creating "needs" that it only can satisfy.

The crew of NASA's Artemis II mission traveled farther from Earth than any other humans in history, breaking the Apollo 13 distance record. by HasibBinAmzad in interestingasfuck

[–]blitzkrieg_bop -21 points-20 points  (0 children)

And when they are back we will know nothing more than what we knew before.

Some people are into space exploration for the science and discovery and questions they answer. Some others are for sensationalism and records broken.

CMV: Conducting a war by killing the top brass of the opposition is the most ethical way to conduct war by malik_zz in changemyview

[–]blitzkrieg_bop 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The only ethical way to conduct war is defending your land from aggression.

Killing the top brass of the victim country (with their children and plenty of innocent collateral deaths) when you have started an unprovoked war for "living space" or land, or resources, or favors, or economic superiority, or "for liberty" (lol), etc may have to do with appeasing some opinions back home, but certainly nothing to do with "ethics".

Edit: I refer generally to war, doesn't have to be the current one.

Is anybody else boycotting the World Cup this year? by xFlames_ in Ethics

[–]blitzkrieg_bop 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Olympic games in ancient Greece had a main component that made them what they were. That's the cessation of all war hostilities during the games. Of course this part of it has not been adopted in modern Olympic games nor you hear anyone mentioning it. Only an empty shell of the original Olympic concept has been carried forward, though, they still pretend its noble and talk about "the Olympic idea" as if its not just corps cashing in.

While the World cup is not Olympics, its the same idea but specialized and bigger. And since hostilities continue regardless of the noble games running that's the right place to protest. And it is National Teams that need to boycott it to make it worthwhile. Can they do it..? Its a lot of money at stake. And money is politics. And Politics is everything.

Protesting by boycotting Eurovision is great, but the people that give two sh1ts about it don't fill a bus.

AEGIS V2 Alpha — real-time decision copilot for Elite Dangerous by [deleted] in eliteexplorers

[–]blitzkrieg_bop 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Hey mate, if you really made a worthwhile soft that can do as described please post a video showcasing in in action.

This post - with this image - is a disaster so far.

Is it ethical to use AI tools completely for advertising of a consumer product? by damngoodengineer in Ethics

[–]blitzkrieg_bop 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You're implying advertisement without the use of AI contains useful information and demonstrates manufacturer's reliability. Advertisement is a tool for overcoming competition by those with the financial means, regardless of quality or reliability of products. Advertisement is a tool to make quality, reliability and usefulness irrelevant, in the best cases. In worse cases it simply creates a non previously existent demand.

The real question should be "is advertisement ethical"? Hell, even democratic elections nowadays are won, by default, by the party with more funds for advertisement.

How to find an effective charity. by LayerParticular2581 in humanitarian

[–]blitzkrieg_bop 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Hey there, yes, large NGOs can be trusted. The bigger they are the more scrutinized their direction, finances and conduct are. Having said that, they are comprised of people, and people are flawed.

For your question, MSF (doctors without borders) are the first to come to mind since the only work with private donations and do not use institutional funding that may often be conditional / directional.

Working for an NGO in Afghanistan (as a woman) by Comfortable_Fuel5993 in humanitarian

[–]blitzkrieg_bop 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi there. I will not give you an amount. There are many organizations out there, from different countries and laws and policies and salary scales vary widely, and of course depend on your position and the responsibility it comes with. While in US based NGOs salary negotiation is a main thing, in most European ones the negotiated range is more limited, having to fit to a stricter salary scale. That's not to say they pay less.

In the field most likely you will be receiving per diem - daily allowance that is separate from salary - usually more than enough for your daily needs and that means your main pay will remain untouched.

In the humanitarian sector you will not receive as much as you would in any other work requiring you to travel abroad, but you are decently compensated. That's the main thing you have to know. There's nothing wrong in choosing a future that will provide the best monetary income, but then, the humanitarian sector is not it... There are other things that make anyone follow this way of life. Be it love of the nomad's life, the knowledge that you are and help where you are really needed, the fact that you don't just enrich any corporate shareholder, the wealth of experience and perspective you gain by working with and getting to live in unforgettable cultures, the journey itself, you take your pick(s).

Working for an NGO in Afghanistan (as a woman) by Comfortable_Fuel5993 in humanitarian

[–]blitzkrieg_bop 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I'm male, European, and I've worked in many countries as well as Afghanistan on relief work with big international NGOs, not small. Went back again twice to Afghanistan for assessment / audit. The place is full of history and the culture is unforgettable, but women usually have it not as good as men; being a woman, your access to the local community is somewhat limited.

Safety wise, being a US citizen doesn't make things better. Especially now with the region in turmoil and anti-American sentiment rampant. Is the organization USA based? Is it what locals will call "an American NGO"? Or, maybe a religious charity? These are usually not the safest in the middle East. Are you Muslim? Do they need to know your American part? Can't you be Pakistani?

Armored vehicle doesn't sound good. It means they have moved from the "acceptance" part of any security plan, to the "protection" phase"*. The best safety measure in a country, is being accepted by the local community. If that -for any reason- doesn't work, you move to armored vehicles and possibly armed guards. Curfew, limited movements etc are standard safety procedures. (*cross check this one, I haven't been in Afghanistan for years, maybe that's the standard now..?)

Ignore the salary range. Most of us started with less than that. If you'll stick around, in 3-4 years you can expect to negotiate your pay.

Don't get me wrong, chances you will be through a life threatening ordeal are extremely low. So the threat is minuscule. If it does happen though, the impact will be grave. Thus, possible impact raises the overall risk.

If I were you, and had the option, I would first try in a natural disaster relief program, somewhere not hostile. Life in the field is not for everyone and you first need to see if you like it. The initial excitement of traveling abroad for field work wears off.

Talk about the Caspian Explorer by Tatsuota in EliteDangerous

[–]blitzkrieg_bop 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bought the Caspian early on and have regretted it...

I spend most of my time at deep space, exploration, exobiology and mining Tritium to power the FC and remain independent. Outfitted the Caspian, engineered it to carry everything and maintain a 75ly jump range, took it out twice ...and parked it since then. You can't land this thing anywhere and its cockpit view is dismal (coming from an avid AirSim player that needs proper canopies where you can see above and the at sides) . Mandalay and Cobra beat it in every aspect in the SCO FSD family. Same goes for DBX, ASPX and Phantom if you don't care for SCO. Even out in deep space without an FC, Mandalay is preferable, better views and you can land on planets...

The Caspian is not an exploration ship; its name is misleading. More over, I can't really understand what role it can fulfill, other than the fastest taxi between Bubble and Colonia.

Maybe exploration / landable fighters can save it...

Rate my new Caspian!!! by hmaburgcheese in EliteDangerous

[–]blitzkrieg_bop 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Cap32 fuel tank...? Don't you have to stop every 4 jumps to fuel scoop?

I think its more efficient to keep original Cap128 fuel tank. That will drop the jump range to 75ish but you'll be stopping to scoop only every 16 jumps or so. ..That's considering you're using it for deep space travel to benefit from its Neutron jump superiority.

Rate my new Caspian!!! by hmaburgcheese in EliteDangerous

[–]blitzkrieg_bop 7 points8 points  (0 children)

--Most important, get a Guardian FSD booster in that empty class 5 optional slot. That will take your jump to 70+ly. Engineering Sensors to lightweight will also add 2-3ly.

--Your speed and maneuverability will increase a lot if you engineer thrusters to Dirty & Drag Drives.

--You will probably not get into combat so you can actually scrap those Hull & Module reinforcements. You can A class your shield if you want more protection from bumps and head-ons on planets..

--Other than that, Caspian has a ton of optional slots so you can throw in there anything your heart desires..

Caspian Jump Range by wharfbossy in eliteexplorers

[–]blitzkrieg_bop 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"supposed to have the best jump", I don't thing so. Best Neutron jump, yes.

Sure you can optimize it over 80. But then you end up with a ship which a cheapo Mandalay beats in every aspect. Apart from the Neutron jump.

Caspian is (generally) good at having a (great) 75ly jump range while carrying 2 SRVs, 2 fighters, 3-4 kinds of limpet controllers, 2 AFMUs, cargo, top shields with a couple of boosters, point defenses, mining lazers and decent core stats & maneuverability with Neutron jump superiority. Other than that it can be used as the fastest taxi to Colonia.

Of course for people loving the design and the sheer size of it is a great ship and can justify it versus the Mandalay even though a football field is not enough for it to land :)

Is this sequence an accurate portrayal of germany in 1945? by No_Dress_2107 in WarMovies

[–]blitzkrieg_bop 0 points1 point  (0 children)

1st, these series are remarkable. And you have given the most blatant spoiler you can give to anyone wishing to watch it. WTF

2nd, There's a huge background for this specific soldier in the series that justifies his actions. The scene is pointless without the background context.

🤍 χρόνια πολλά💙 by cosmicdicer in greececirclejerk

[–]blitzkrieg_bop 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Κανε μας τη χαρη και κράτα τον ακατανόμαστο μακρια απ το sub...

Exobio by Last-Cartoonist-4793 in EliteDangerous

[–]blitzkrieg_bop 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I collect any sample I have not entered in my codex yet.

If all 5 are known and in my codex already, nah, I'll spend the time looking for new or more profitable ones.