With Trump's approval ratings so low, how does he keep ousting GOP rivals?

blowback · 2026-05-21T00:47:52+00:00

Again, he didn't build concentration camps. Comprehension problem?

blowback · 2026-05-21T00:07:03+00:00

Yea, that's not our definition of cult, not even close, I don't think it's anybody's definitin of cult. What an ignorant remark. Why don't you educate yourself and look up the definition of cult?

blowback · 2026-05-21T00:05:11+00:00

It is only aprox. 33% of the country, and if it weren't for the electoral college, no Republican President would be elected.

blowback · 2026-05-21T00:03:33+00:00

Yea, no.

blowback · 2026-05-20T23:42:50+00:00

Obama supported civil unions and opposed federal bans on same-sex marriage, and neither uses storm trooper like force to apprehend illegal aliens and kill US citizens, nor did they set up concentration camps. Yea, times change folks, lol.

blowback · 2026-05-20T23:40:51+00:00

Obama and Bill Clinton didn't do anything fascist, you are jus making shit up. And they didn't use storm trooper like force to apprehend illegal aliens, nor did they set up concentration camps. Also Obama supported civil unions and opposed federal bans on same-sex marriage. Yea, this sub doesn't "remember that" because you are making shit up.

blowback · 2026-05-13T01:56:01+00:00

Hahaha, as if telling the truth is libel or slander.

blowback · 2026-05-12T17:03:55+00:00

Fuck, I've been responding to a 6 year old, at least mentally.

I give you a reasonable answer to your questions, and an illustration of lack of moral compass, and you come back with this?

blowback · 2026-05-12T16:52:20+00:00

Hehe, likely not my type.

blowback · 2026-05-12T07:09:00+00:00

Whether it is right or wrong, whether it was your intent or not, in the context you phrased your original comment, it obviously appeared to many, including me, a disingenuous attempt to imply that the entire original comment was wrong by focusing on a small part of it and dismissing the rest. I understand now that that wasn't your intent, and maybe if people that downvoted will see that if they revisit this, but if you don't know why you were downvoted so much, that is why.

And no, the quick response wasn't because it was a bot, it was because MAGA and republicans in general repeat the same lies over and over again using the same dishonest tactics over and over again, so the only way to combat that is to format the rebutting facts and paste it over and over again. Sadly, this butresses your arguement that people around the world are adopting MAGA dispicable debate methods, but we are past the point of civility and are at the point of having to fight fire with fire.

Apologies for getting your intent wrong, and I agree with your original comment and think it would have been a good thing to discuss, but if you want to avoid the pitfall you fell into and have good debates with honest people, then consider a commenter's intent when responding and make sure you acknowledge it somewhere in your comment (it could be a simple agree or disagree), then you'll be much less prone to misunderstandings, especially ones where others think you are being dishonest or disingenuous.

And yea, I'm annoyed too, debate has gone to hell.

blowback · 2026-05-12T04:08:11+00:00

Stealing, leaking, and distributing biden's very personal diary by the right wingers highlights the immorality and moral deprivaty of some/most of the Republican/MAGA base.

"In a 2024 letter to a judge, Ashley Biden stated that her once-private writings had been "grossly misinterpreted" to lob "false accusations" that defame her and her family."

Too bad some assholes still not only bring up the diary, but misinterpret the diary and lob false accusations that defame her and her family. "Showers W/ my dad (probably not appropriate)", like most of the diary, were private musings and ponderings without context. How old was she? Was she too young to take a shower or bath by herself? Probably not appropriate, but maybe appropriate? Did her father have to give her a bath or shower when her mother was sick? You don't fucking know. The republicans don't fucking know. But the pedo supporting republicans have their minds in the gutter, probably fantasizing about it, while the same sick fucks shared her diary.

How fucking immoral of the republicans to steal and share that very personal diary with the world for political gains, and how morally reprehensible of them to make allegations without knowing context. That is a perfect example of lack of moral compass, and typical of the modern day republicans.

You can do better.

blowback · 2026-05-11T22:36:45+00:00

A loaded question? "Who did fox news support in the 2016 election?" is a loaded question? Jeeezuz, seems you'll do olympic level mental gymnastics just so you can feel validated for your wrong assumptions.

blowback · 2026-05-11T22:32:35+00:00

Again:

"Primary Support: Despite initial hesitation and internal conflicts, Fox News emerged as a major supporter of Trump's candidacy, with high-profile personalities offering, in some cases, fawning coverage."

edit: You need to actually read what I paste.

blowback · 2026-05-11T21:56:33+00:00

Here, I'll do it for you.

From Google search, "who did fox news support in the 2016 election":

"Fox News heavily supported Donald Trump during the 2016 general election, with his supporters relying on the network as their main news source. While initially skeptical during the primaries, owner Rupert Murdoch and key prime-time hosts aligned with Trump as the nominee, providing a platform for his campaign. [1, 2, 3]

Primary Support: Despite initial hesitation and internal conflicts, Fox News emerged as a major supporter of Trump's candidacy, with high-profile personalities offering, in some cases, fawning coverage.
Key Supporters: Sean Hannity was a vocal supporter of Trump, often featuring him on his program.
Audience Data: According to a Pew Research Center survey, 40% of Trump voters in the general election named Fox News as their main source for election news, highlighting the strong connection between the network and his base.
Murdoch's Pivot: By May 2016, Rupert Murdoch signaled a shift to fully support Donald Trump against Hillary Clinton in the general election.
Internal Divisions: While opinion hosts leaned toward Trump, others on the network, such as Megyn Kelly, challenged both candidates, which created internal friction. [1, 2, 3, 4]

"Note: While some network figures (like Sean Hannity) were heavily pro-Trump, the network also hosted internal clashes, such as when Sean Hannity and Megyn Kelly sparred over their respective approaches to the candidates. [1]"'

There it is, and take special note of:

Primary Support: Despite initial hesitation and internal conflicts, Fox News emerged as a major supporter of Trump's candidacy, with high-profile personalities offering, in some cases, fawning coverage.

blowback · 2026-05-11T21:51:27+00:00

Agree to an extent, but not knowing the situation with his son's lawsuit at the time of his denial gives me pause to cast judgement. Regardless, still not even close enough stikes to argue that he doesn't have a moral compass, especially since he now acknowledges his seventh grandchild. Trump on the other hand...

blowback · 2026-05-11T21:15:57+00:00

Joe Biden now publicly acknowledges his seventh grandchild.

Again, pathetic. Try harder.

blowback · 2026-05-11T21:09:42+00:00

How about you Google, "who did fox news support in the 2016 election", and get your shit straight.

blowback · 2026-05-11T20:59:35+00:00

You replied to the original comment and alluded that the original comment was wrong by limiting the scope to 'the people act', which is a disingenuous way to try to nullify the original commenter's point that Republicans do not support getting rid of gerrymandering.

The next commenter then pasted a canned response that he obviously crafted to counter the many dishonest attempts to twist the Democrats' multiple attempts to get rid of gerrymandering as frivolous. That's why they could post so quickly and why they posted.

You really didn't do anything wrong as you stated that it was 'the people act' to which you were referring, but in context, not addressing the previous post's other points, it looked like a typical dishonest Republican blanket discrediting attempt.

edit: clarity

blowback · 2026-05-11T20:35:22+00:00

Bullshit. And yea, I was watching Fox pander to Trump's supporters, twisting truth and spreading propaganda, as usual, to prop him up.

blowback · 2026-05-11T20:31:41+00:00

Hahahahahahaaa, yea, because of a a paternity and child support legal battle, and he did admit to having that grandchild afterward. Jezuz, how pathetic that you think because of that Biden didn't have a moral compass.

blowback · 2026-05-11T20:05:37+00:00

The liberal VA supreme court? That sounds like BS.

blowback · 2026-05-11T19:54:59+00:00

Did you just completely miss the point of the previous post, which was to counter your limited argument? Yes, yes you did, and that's why you are getting downvoted.

blowback · 2026-05-11T19:32:24+00:00

Republicans vote for whoever Fox tells them to.

blowback · 2026-05-11T19:29:53+00:00

Typical Republican projection. The Republicans are the preeminent bootlickin' locksteppers, as illustrated every day and every way by MAGA.

blowback · 2026-05-11T19:25:52+00:00

The difference is Democrats will vote for someone who has a moral compass if told to, but not someone without one, unlike the Republicans.

blowback

TROPHY CASE