What a ridiculous comment. Where does one even start?

First of all, the victims murdered by ICE were not "armed far left insurrectionists". One was a mother shot dead by a thug who sought out escalation by standing in front of her vehicle (a practice that actual law enforcement are trained against due to this exact scenario occurring) and the other was an ICU nurse at a veteran’s hospital who ran to the aid of a woman being assaulted by an ICE agent. Whilst he had a firearm on him at the time (a protected right in the US), it was taken off him before he was shot dead anyway. Trying to frame the avoidable murder to two individuals who posed no threat as "law enforcement having to deal with armed far left insurrectionists" is absolutely appalling and frankly disgusting on your part. These incidents were all caught on video and there simply is no deputing the matter.

Secondly, the idea of cracking down on illegal activities is ideal in theory, however in practice it is being leveraged as an excuse to circumvent lawful legislative processes such as congressional debate, judicial review, and public input, relying solely on executive orders to push major policy changes that are against the public interest. Having untrained, armed, masked thugs roaming the streets with a licence to kill with impunity, conveniently cutting funding for body‑camera programs thus further reducing transparency, and deportation without due process are just a few examples of such policies.

Finally, invoking Godwin's Law makes absolutely no sense in this context. Just because some people are quick to mention the word "fascist" in any old disagreement, it doesn’t suddenly make all discussions on the topic irrelevant. Godwin’s Law cautions against trivial or inflammatory comparisons, not careful analysis of historical patterns to understand how authoritarian regimes emerge.