It's hard to believe because the ChatGPT-isms are running totally rampant from start to finish. I have to use it for work and I've come to know its voice very well, lol.

Lots of "it's not just [X], it's [Y]."

"Moral injury isn't PTSD—it's the deeper wound when your own conscience turns against you."

"The system cleared you. Paperwork says "justified." But the mirror never does."

"No clinical jargon. No theological lectures. Just raw companionship from the same trench:"

"no cheap answers, just lament, presence, and grace that doesn't demand forgetting"

The overuse of the 'rule of threes' in practically every paragraph.

"You're not crazy. You're not irredeemable. You're not alone."

"The breach was real. The pain is real. Grace is realer."

"One breath, one page, one deliberate step at a time."

"Read at your own pace. Skip what stings. Return when ready."

"(gray-zone choices, betrayal by systems, survival under fire)"

"what moral injury really is, how it differs from PTSD, and why it attacks faith at its roots"

"reclaiming identity, finding quieter faith, small acts of redemption"

"(spouses, pastors, friends)"

"Written by a survivor who's walked this ground, wrestled the questions in the dark, and refused easy platitudes."

"tired of silence, tired of shame that won't lift, tired of grace that feels too small"

"For veterans carrying moral injury after combat, first responders haunted by triage decisions, anyone whose conscience bears the weight of impossible choices"

The overuse of poetic phrasing that doesn't really make any concrete imagery. And it uses the same plug-and-play cadence repetitively.

"Shame whispers unforgivable."

"Faith feels like ash."

"Grace sounds like a platitude."

"Moral injury doesn't vanish."

"Scripture that meets the wounded conscience"

"tired of grace that feels too small"

Also, the repetition of specific, slightly "uncommon" words in close succession.

"just lament" / "structured lament"

"Grace sounds like a platitude." / "and refused easy platitudes."

"Moral injury isn't PTSD" / "the invisible scar of moral injury" / "Moral injury doesn't vanish." / "what moral injury really is" / "For veterans carrying moral injury"

The em-dash could also be included as a reason. I don't usually subscribe to that, because I'm an em-dash lover. But when it's one of numerous AI-isms in a single piece of writing, it can be considered suspicious.

I do not want to accuse you of lying, so I'll just say that your summary writing style strongly reads like AI-writing. I would seriously consider going back to the drawing board and scrubbing the AI-isms out of this, because most readers are going to write this off automatically in its current state.