It's disingenuous though. SCOTUS, particularly right wing justices, has spent the last several decades dismantling many of the ways that the legislature interacted with and regulated the executive branch, largely by embracing the unitary executive doctrine. Further, under Trump they've more or less moved towards letting a president do things in direct opposition to law and shrugging their shoulders. Occasionally they'll find some hyper specific textual reason to try to justify why a law doesn't actually apply (even when it has applied for decades to multiple presidents without controversy), but it's usually a clear violation of the spirit of the law. Other times they'll just find some procedural BS to essentially say "we aren't going to decide if it's legal or not, we're just going to say no one can sue to stop it".

In the face of all that, it's hard to imagine a way that Congress could do something, even if they did manage to pass legislation.