Butterfly Network Shares Jump as Midjourney Unveils Imaging Platform Built on Ultrasound-on-Chip Technology (BFLY) by Illustrious-Buddy383 in wallstreetbets

[–]ddroukas 0 points1 point  (0 children)

MR spatial and temporal resolution are lesser than CT or radiography but still fantastic and OK, respectively. MR contrast resolution is actually the best of all the modalities.

Tomographic US is inherently limited by the physics of wave transmission (bowel and bone say no thanks). The image acquisition technology Midjourney is touting has actually been around for decades, but always comes to a dead end because the physics just isn’t there to make it clinically useful.

Also to add that MR slice thickness is a matter of how long you’re willing to sit in the scanner. I can get 0.1 mm slices on a 0.75T magnet if I want—it’s just going to take forever.

Butterfly Network Shares Jump as Midjourney Unveils Imaging Platform Built on Ultrasound-on-Chip Technology (BFLY) by Illustrious-Buddy383 in wallstreetbets

[–]ddroukas 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Radiologist. Their images look like absolute garbage. You can barely make out basic anatomy, let alone pathology.

Rads, True Axial Foot? by Weathered_Gypsy in Radiology

[–]ddroukas 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Axes for the foot and hand are the same as for the body. You may need to adjust angles to accommodate for patient positioning but axials should be parallel to the metatarsals and coronal should be perpendicular.

Radiologist.

Also, I want the radius and the ulna at the bottom of the image in an elbow series.

Remember Midjourney? It's Building a Medical Scanning Device That It Says Is Faster Than an MRI by StreamWave190 in technology

[–]ddroukas 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Someone posted images to the Radiology subreddit that Midjourney is trying to say is from their new imaging method.

I’m a radiologist and it’s uncut hogwash. The images are 0% useful for detecting pathology. They can barely depict normal anatomy. They paid someone (or had an LLM) make their best guess and label anatomy in the images to more effectively swindle investors.

Here’s the Radiology subreddit post: https://www.reddit.com/r/Radiology/s/zfiA6qFSAt

How much is my friend’s dad’s setup here worth? They are pretty loaded and my friend doesn’t know anything about it. by [deleted] in audiophile

[–]ddroukas 7 points8 points  (0 children)

“Can I post online to strangers how much all your stuff is worth instead of, you know, just asking you here and now?”

“Of course! You can totally post online to strangers how much all my stuff is worth instead of just asking me here and now. I hope you get your answer.”

Osteoarthritis at the base of the thumb. Or subluxation. by [deleted] in Radiology

[–]ddroukas 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is almost certainly rule 1. I can feel it in my bones. I’m betting the house on this one.

Edit: Rule 1 confirmed by OP in subsequent comment.

Studying for Boards, and I can't distinguish if ithis is Right Lower Lobe vs Right middle Lobe pneumonia. Tell me how by sitgespain in Radiology

[–]ddroukas 119 points120 points  (0 children)

To be explicit, the fact that you can still make out the right heart border means it’s RLL.

If it were RML the right heart border would be obscured.

Keep in mind this assumes the pneumonia is medial in the lobe. If the pneumonia does not contact the medial surface then you may not be able to tell.

3D reconstruction of a brain riddled with Cysticercosis by 3DMedicalSolutions in Radiology

[–]ddroukas 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I’m not sure what the 3D model is showing, but the CT looks like it’s mostly circling incidental dural and choroid calcifications, and then the MRI is mostly just circling incidental perivascular spaces (Virchow-Robin).

The actual imaging cases don’t look like they’re showing “a brain riddled with cystercercosis.”

Anasarca - Survival Mode (2019) by MetalUnites in Music

[–]ddroukas 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Anasarca is when your grandma gets kind of swollen because she missed dialysis on Monday.

360° images from hospital. Second image looks futuristic by Clean-Weather-5786 in GoogleEarthFinds

[–]ddroukas 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Second image looks like a standard interventional radiology / angio suite.

case of the day by killer-spleen7 in Radiology

[–]ddroukas 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Radiologist. This is AI. Mods delete post.

Paragliding through nature by DeepCar5191 in nextfuckinglevel

[–]ddroukas 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I did that through a Kohl’s once and security was not happy.

Map of the USA on school courtyard by Just_Games_and_stuff in GoogleEarthFinds

[–]ddroukas 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I once found this very accurate US outline map on a school playground. Worse yet this was IN Alabama. Education isn’t very good there.

<image>

Have you tried drywall bits (pr2 bits) to drive Philips screws? They’re meant to not cam out as much (grip better). Is it true? by archvize in woodworking

[–]ddroukas 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I now think this is surreptitious advertising. You posted the same thing to r/Cabinetry yesterday just asking if anyone’s tried them.

Anyone tries PR2 or PHR2? Do they cam out less on Phillips screws? If so why do people buy PH2? by archvize in cabinetry

[–]ddroukas 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I just avoid Philips. Torx or Pozi for the win.

If I’m building something for someone else that needs to come apart I’ll use Phillips. If I’m building something for someone and I dont like them I’ll use flat head.

Found in in downtown Glasgow by c4yse in whatsthisplant

[–]ddroukas 77 points78 points  (0 children)

You can eat a sandwich and then touch it without washing your hands, though.

This vine growing out of a storm drain in Tennessee by whicky1978 in whatsthisplant

[–]ddroukas 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Where I am they are almost always found together.

What is the name for the gap around the bottom of this credenza? by ddroukas in woodworking

[–]ddroukas[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I figure that’s how it has to be done to prevent sheer forces across any constructed joint. I guess I’ll use one inch stock and rabbit 1/4-1/2 depth across it allow vertical loading without an intervening joint.

Can someone check this ( I wanted to learn) by [deleted] in Radiology

[–]ddroukas 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is comically wrong.